IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7150-d407536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Assessment on the Technical and Economic Feasibility of Mechanized Rice Straw Collection in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Carlito Balingbing

    (Mechanization and Postharvest Cluster, Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines)

  • Nguyen Van Hung

    (Mechanization and Postharvest Cluster, Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines)

  • Ampy Paulo Roxas

    (Mechanization and Postharvest Cluster, Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines)

  • Daniel Aquino

    (Philippine Carabao Center, Central Luzon State University, Muñoz Science City 3120, Philippines)

  • Mary Grace Barbacias

    (Mechanization and Postharvest Cluster, Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines)

  • Martin Gummert

    (Mechanization and Postharvest Cluster, Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines)

Abstract

The increasing utilization of rice combine harvesters in the Philippines has made collection of scattered rice straw difficult and laborious. While there are high demands for using rice straw, e.g., for feed or mushroom production, rice straw is predominantly burned in the field due to labor shortages and the high manual cost of collection, particularly for scattered rice straw harvested by combine harvesters. This study conducted an assessment and evaluated the feasibility of mechanized collection of rice straw by comparing the performance of two types of baler (i.e., roller and piston type) for two seasons—2019 wet and dry seasons at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and in Nueva Ecija, the Philippines. The study collected data on fuel consumption, manpower requirements, and field capacity by operating the balers to collect scattered rice straw in the field and piled rice straw that was left in the field after threshing. The round baler operated at 35% lower effective field capacity (EFC) on piled rice straw than on scattered rice straw, while the square baler operated at 2.33 times and 5.79 times higher EFC compared with the round baler on piled and scattered rice straw, respectively. The square baler used for collecting scattered rice straw is more appropriate under Philippine conditions, with a significantly lower baling cost by about 68% and an average EFC that is 4.43 times higher compared to the round baler. With the increasing demand for rice straw as feedstock for ruminants and for other alternative uses, using mechanical balers to gather scattered rice straw in the field is a sustainable option for farmers to utilize the straw for value-adding purposes. This is a foremost study conducted in the Philippines to guide policy makers, development workers, and end-users on the suitability of either square balers or round balers to gather scattered rice straw in the field after rice harvesting with combines.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlito Balingbing & Nguyen Van Hung & Ampy Paulo Roxas & Daniel Aquino & Mary Grace Barbacias & Martin Gummert, 2020. "An Assessment on the Technical and Economic Feasibility of Mechanized Rice Straw Collection in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7150-:d:407536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carvalho, Danilo José & Veiga, João Paulo Soto & Bizzo, Waldir Antonio, 2017. "Analysis of energy consumption in three systems for collecting sugarcane straw for use in power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 178-187.
    2. Arrigo Salvatore Guerrieri & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Francesco Santoro & Simone Pascuzzi, 2019. "Study of a Large Square Baler with Innovative Technological Systems that Optimize the Baling Effectiveness," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Antonio Pantaleo & Francesco Santoro & Marwa R. Elkatory & Giuseppe De Mastro & Amany El Sikaily & Safaa Ragab & Ahmed El Nemr, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of ZnO Nanoparticles Pretreatments for Biogas Production from Barley Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Copa Rey, José Ramón & Tamayo Pacheco, Jorge Jadid & António da Cruz Tarelho, Luís & Silva, Valter & Cardoso, João Sousa & Silveira, José Luz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo, 2021. "Evaluation of cogeneration alternative systems integrating biomass gasification applied to a Brazilian sugar industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 318-333.
    3. Artur Przywara & Francesco Santoro & Artur Kraszkiewicz & Anna Pecyna & Simone Pascuzzi, 2020. "Experimental Study of Disc Fertilizer Spreader Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Negrão, Djanira R. & Grandis, Adriana & Buckeridge, Marcos S. & Rocha, George J.M. & Leal, Manoel Regis L.V. & Driemeier, Carlos, 2021. "Inorganics in sugarcane bagasse and straw and their impacts for bioenergy and biorefining: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Salina, Fernando Henriques & Molina, Felipe Braggio & Gallego, Antonio Garrido & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo, 2021. "Fast pyrolysis of sugarcane straw and its integration into the conventional ethanol production process through Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    6. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Anna Stankiewicz, 2019. "Optimal and Robustly Optimal Consumption of Stretch Film Used for Wrapping Cylindrical Baled Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Semjons Ivanovs & Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Ievhen Ihnatiev, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Front-Mounted Beet Topper Machine for Biomass Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Semjons Ivanovs & Zinoviy Ruzhylo & Ivan Fedosiy & Francesco Santoro, 2020. "A New Spiral Potato Cleaner to Enhance the Removal of Impurities and Soil Clods in Potato Harvesting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Simone Pascuzzi & Volodymyr Bulgakov & Francesco Santoro & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Semjons Ivanovs & Ivan Holovach, 2020. "A Study on the Drift of Spray Droplets Dipped in Airflows with Different Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Volodymyr Nadykto & Olga Orynycz & Simone Pascuzzi, 2022. "Reduction in Energy Consumption by Mitigation of Cultivation Resistance Due to the New Fallow Harrow Concept," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-12, November.
    12. Go, Alchris Woo & Conag, Angelique T., 2019. "Utilizing sugarcane leaves/straws as source of bioenergy in the Philippines: A case in the Visayas Region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1230-1237.
    13. José Ignacio Rojas-Sola & Gloria del Río-Cidoncha & Ángel Coronil-García, 2020. "Industrial Archaeology Applied to the Study of an Ancient Harvesting Machine: Three-Dimensional Modelling and Virtual Reconstruction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Antonio Pantaleo & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Francesco Santoro & Sara Rajabi Hamedani, 2020. "Techno-Economic Modeling of Biomass Pellet Routes: Feasibility in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7150-:d:407536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.