IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i13p5372-d379627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Selection Methods of Tourism Characteristic Town: The Case of Liaoning Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Zhou

    (College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Fei Zhao

    (West China Region of China Resources Land Limited, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Qingwei Xu

    (College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Yongbo Yuan

    (Department of Construction Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Mingyuan Zhang

    (Department of Construction Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

The construction of a characteristic town is an important measure to promote the economic transformation and upgrading of China. It also promotes the coordinated and balanced development between urban and rural areas, and the construction of new urbanization and new rural areas. At present, China’s township governments are actively declaring construction projects of characteristic town. Considering the limitation of resources and funds, the government needs to choose projects with better foundation and better development prospects to invest and build, to avoid the waste of resources brought about by blind construction. Starting from the pre-selection of the construction projects of the characteristic town, taking Liaoning Province as an example, this research divided the characteristic town into four categories. Initially established the characteristic town evaluation index system blending comprehensive and multivariate index; then optimizes the index system through the statistical analysis, reliability analysis; and validity analysis of the questionnaire survey to finally obtain the selection index system of the construction projects of the characteristic town of Liaoning Province. Secondly, using the combination of Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Improved Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (Improved-TOPSIS) method, the selection evaluation model of tourism-type characteristic town construction projects are obtained. Finally, taking the three tourism-type characteristic town projects declared by Liaoning Province as an example, using the ANP and Improved-TOPSIS evaluation model to evaluate and compare the three towns. The priority of “Xietun Town, Tanghe Town, Zhaoquanhe Town” is obtained. The result is consistent with the recommended order and verifies the applicability of the selection model. At the same time, through the feedback of the evaluation process, the current development constraints of the three towns are clarified, and the future development direction of the town is pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Zhou & Fei Zhao & Qingwei Xu & Yongbo Yuan & Mingyuan Zhang, 2020. "Evaluation and Selection Methods of Tourism Characteristic Town: The Case of Liaoning Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5372-:d:379627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rod Bantjes, 2011. "Rural sustainability and the built environment," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 158-178, April.
    2. Kim, Kyungmi & Uysal, Muzaffer & Sirgy, M. Joseph, 2013. "How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 527-540.
    3. Rod Bantjes, 2011. "Rural sustainability and the built environment," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 158-178, May.
    4. Deborah Stiles & Greg Cameron, 2009. "Changing paradigms?," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(4), pages 341-354, October.
    5. Caroline Saunders & Paul Dalziel, 2010. "Local planning for sustainable development," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(3), pages 252-267, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenying Zhang & Lian Zhu & Zixuan Zhang & Zhan Zhang & Linjun Lu, 2020. "A Sustainable Evaluation Method for a Tourism Public Wayfinding System: A Case Study of Shanghai Disneyland Resort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Shitong Huang & Kai Yang & Ping Wang & Qing Yang & Luyun Li, 2023. "A Comprehensive Evaluation on the Performances of China’s Information Technology Characteristic Towns Utilizing the Advantage-Oriented Competitive Evaluation (ACE) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brennan Lowery & John Dagevos & Ratana Chuenpagdee & Kelly Vodden, 2020. "Storytelling for sustainable development in rural communities: An alternative approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1813-1826, November.
    2. Ramisa Shafqat & Dora Marinova & Shahed Khan, 2022. "Adapting Grounded Theory to Investigate Sustainability Heritage in Informal Settlements: Case Studies from Islamabad, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Teck Hong Tan & Ji Hei Lee, 2022. "Residential environment, third places and well-being in Malaysian older adults," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 721-738, July.
    4. Giovanni Perucca, 2019. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Cultural City Life: Evidence from EU Cities," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 461-478, April.
    5. Salvatore Bimonte & Antonella D’Agostino, 2021. "Tourism development and residents’ well-being: Comparing two seaside destinations in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1508-1525, November.
    6. Tie Wang & Wei Wang & Zhongjun Wu & Ching-Hui Su & Ming-Hsiang Chen, 2019. "Understanding Farm Households’ Participation in Nong Jia Le in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Cathrine Linnes & Jerome Agrusa & Giulio Ronzoni & Joseph Lema, 2022. "What Tourists Want, a Sustainable Paradise," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Lei Kang & Zhaoping Yang & Yunxiao Dang & Wenzhong Zhang & Caicai Liu, 2022. "Can Tourism Development Make Cities More Livable? Investigating 40 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Oksana Tokarchuk & Roberto Gabriele & Oswin Maurer, 2016. "Tourism intensity impact on satisfaction with life of German residents," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(6), pages 1315-1331, December.
    10. Aleksandra Łapko & Aleksander Panasiuk & Roma Strulak-Wójcikiewicz & Marek Landowski, 2020. "The State of Air Pollution as a Factor Determining the Assessment of a City’s Tourist Attractiveness—Based on the Opinions of Polish Respondents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Guido Sechi & Zaiga Krisjane & Maris Berzins & Daina Vinklere, 2014. "Quality of Life and Tourism-Related Perceptions among Residents: Evidence from Lake Engure Area, Latvia," ERSA conference papers ersa14p597, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Josef Zelenka & Jaroslav Kacetl, 2014. "The Concept of Carrying Capacity in Tourism," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(36), pages 641-641, May.
    13. Gabriela Popescu & Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Elena Peț & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2022. "Sustainability through Rural Tourism in Moieciu Area-Development Analysis and Future Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Huang, Zhuowei (Joy) & Cai, Liping A., 2015. "Modeling consumer-based brand equity for multinational hotel brands – When hosts become guests," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 431-443.
    15. Ana María Campón-Cerro & José Antonio Folgado-Fernández & José Manuel Hernández-Mogollón, 2017. "Rural Destination Development Based on Olive Oil Tourism: The Impact of Residents’ Community Attachment and Quality of Life on Their Support for Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa & Ringle, Christian M. & Jaafar, Mastura & Ramayah, T., 2017. "Urban vs. rural destinations: Residents’ perceptions, community participation and support for tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.
    17. Bimonte, Salvatore & Faralla, Valeria, 2016. "Does residents' perceived life satisfaction vary with tourist season? A two-step survey in a Mediterranean destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 199-208.
    18. Jingjing Liu & Jamie M. Chen & Peter Nijkamp & James F. Petrick, 2023. "Threshold effect of tourism density on urban livability: a modeling study on Chinese cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 315-331, February.
    19. Giovanni Ruggieri & Patrizia Calò, 2022. "Tourism Dynamics and Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis between Mediterranean Islands—Evidence for Post-COVID-19 Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, March.
    20. Sifeng Nian & Jie Zhang & Honglei Zhang & Jinhe Zhang & Donghe Li & Ke Wu & Xue Chen & Lingling Yang, 2019. "Two Sides of a Coin: A Crisis Response Perspective on Tourist Community Participation in a Post-Disaster Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5372-:d:379627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.