IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15220-d1266319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Evaluation on the Performances of China’s Information Technology Characteristic Towns Utilizing the Advantage-Oriented Competitive Evaluation (ACE) Method

Author

Listed:
  • Shitong Huang

    (International Business School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Kai Yang

    (School of Business, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 211544, China)

  • Ping Wang

    (International Business School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Qing Yang

    (International Business School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Luyun Li

    (International Business School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

Abstract

The characteristic town (CT, or Te Se Xiao Zhen in Chinese) program is among the most important drivers of China’s new urbanization. However, the program aroused countrywide concerns about its rapid elevation, excessive real estate construction, high investment risk, and severe construction homogenization. Despite the policy’s rapid dissemination, there needs to be a theoretical basis and practical guidance for the local government to evaluate CT candidates to ensure the feasibility and sustainability of this novel urbanization practice. Moreover, simply employing traditional evaluation techniques, such as TOPSIS or analytical hierarchical process, may overwhelmingly stress inherited advantages of existing towns and easily overlook the potential candidates in the policy’s early implementation. Thus, the current study employs a novel advantage-oriented competitive evaluation (ACE) approach, which values the comparative advantages of the evaluated objects, to rate the performance of fifteen information technology characteristic towns (ITCTs) comprehensively. The presented work constructs a three-level performance index system based on public statistics, comprehensively evaluates the ITCTs’ performance, and reveals each CT’s unique advantages. The analysis and discussion disclose the evaluated ITCTs’ development status, highlighting the blooming development against public concerns and the ITCTs’ clustering based on unique comparative advantages. The evaluation results also verify that the ACE is an excellent comprehensive evaluation approach that can reveal an object’s comparative advantages from varying facets and depths. Finally, this work briefly concludes the emerging issues of ITCTs’ construction, the limitations of ACE evaluation, and suggestions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Shitong Huang & Kai Yang & Ping Wang & Qing Yang & Luyun Li, 2023. "A Comprehensive Evaluation on the Performances of China’s Information Technology Characteristic Towns Utilizing the Advantage-Oriented Competitive Evaluation (ACE) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15220-:d:1266319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang Zhou & Fei Zhao & Qingwei Xu & Yongbo Yuan & Mingyuan Zhang, 2020. "Evaluation and Selection Methods of Tourism Characteristic Town: The Case of Liaoning Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenying Zhang & Lian Zhu & Zixuan Zhang & Zhan Zhang & Linjun Lu, 2020. "A Sustainable Evaluation Method for a Tourism Public Wayfinding System: A Case Study of Shanghai Disneyland Resort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15220-:d:1266319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.