IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p5171-d375885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Learning Tools in the Era of m-Learning: Utility and Attitudes in Accounting College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa C. Herrador-Alcaide

    (Department of Business Economics and Accounting, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Montserrat Hernández-Solís

    (Department of Business Economics and Accounting, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • J. Fortunato Hontoria

    (National Distance Education University (UNED) (Madrid Sur-Tutor in Computing Teaching Area), 28935 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Learning in the Era of Mobile means an expansion in the range of learning tools, which are much more accessible thanks to the use of mobile devices. The greater possibilities of applying online tools for learning do not eliminate problems related to distance learning, such as personal factors related to attitude and student’s perception in virtual learning environments. It is necessary to consider whether the mere application of online tools in m-learning is enough or whether the context and the way in which online learning tools are applied are what is really important, even more so when the program is directed towards students using a distance learning system. Seen from this point of view, the utility of online tools is a key factor for successful learning. Furthermore, it is known that the personal attitude can affect the student’s perception about different aspects of learning, such as the perceived utility of the tools online. Considering the above arguments, the objective of this research is to measure the perceived utility of online learning tools by university students in a teaching environment accessible by mobile devices. Likewise, as a complementary objective to the measurement of perceived utility, the explanatory variables that could cause some effect on the perceived utility were analyzed. The analysis of explanatory variables is focused on personal attitudes, such as attitude towards accounting or the perceived role of the teacher. The data were collected through a questionnaire. Scoring indicators were applied to quantify the scores of university students for each variable. The analysis showed that mature students in a distance education program in Accounting assign high value to online tools and give a high score to their own attitude towards Accounting and the teacher’s role in virtual learning. Regression analysis indicates that about 34% of the perceived utility of online tools could be explained by their positive attitude towards Accounting and by the role of the teacher in m-learning. The identification of explanatory variables of perceived utility of online tools could improve the design and adaptation of the virtual environment, according to personal needs of college students.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa C. Herrador-Alcaide & Montserrat Hernández-Solís & J. Fortunato Hontoria, 2020. "Online Learning Tools in the Era of m-Learning: Utility and Attitudes in Accounting College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5171-:d:375885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosina Mladenovic, 2000. "An investigation into ways of challenging introductory accounting students' negative perceptions of accounting," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 135-155.
    2. Lin Mei Tan & Fawzi Laswad, 2006. "Students' beliefs, attitudes and intentions to major in accounting," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 167-187.
    3. Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & Carmen Rodríguez-Jiménez & Gerardo Gómez-García & Magdalena Ramos Navas-Parejo, 2020. "Educational Innovation in Higher Education: Use of Role Playing and Educational Video in Future Teachers’ Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Pru Marriott & Nicholas McGuigan, 2018. "Visual metaphor and visual tools in accounting education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 549-551, November.
    5. Gülden İlin, 2019. "Sustainability in Lifelong Learning: Learners’ Perceptions from a Turkish Distance Language Education Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Julia Osgerby & Pru Marriott & Maria Gee, 2018. "Accounting students perceptions of using visual metaphor as part of personal development planning: an exploratory case study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 570-589, November.
    7. Rui Silva & Ricardo Rodrigues & Carmem Leal, 2019. "Play it again: how game-based learning improves flow in Accounting and Marketing education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 484-507, September.
    8. Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Venancio Tauringana & Ernest Amoaful Bansah & Dominic Essuman, 2019. "Determinants of academic performance of accounting students in Ghanaian secondary and tertiary education institutions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 553-581, November.
    9. Bailey, Charles D., 2017. "Psychopathy and accounting students’ attitudes towards unethical professional practices," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 15-32.
    10. Beverley Jackling & Paul de Lange & Jon Phillips & James Sewell, 2012. "Attitudes towards accounting: differences between Australian and international students," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 113-130, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rouye Pan & Zihan Qin & Lan Zhang & Ligao Lou & Huiju Yu & Junfeng Yang, 2023. "Exploring the impact of intelligent learning tools on students’ independent learning abilities: a PLS-SEM analysis of grade 6 students in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Mohamad Ridhuan Mat Dangi & Shazalina Mohamed Shuhidan, 2024. "Interaction Influence of Organisational Support on the Educators’ Acceptance, Personality Traits, and Technological Competence towards Intention to Adopt the Virtual Learning Environment," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 1297-1323, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karlsson, Per & Noela, Massa, 2022. "Beliefs influencing students’ career choices in Sweden and reasons for not choosing the accounting profession," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M., 2020. "Accounting education literature review (2019)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    3. Pruijssers, Jorien Louise & Singer, Gallia & Singer, Zvi & Tsang, Desmond, 2023. "Social influence pressures and the risk preferences of aspiring financial market professionals," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Huikku, Jari & Myllymäki, Emma-Riikka & Ojala, Hannu, 2022. "Gender differences in the first course in accounting: An achievement goal approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    5. Wells, Paul K., 2018. "How well do our introductory accounting text books reflect current accounting practice?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 40-48.
    6. Kevin M. Baird & Venkateshwaran Narayanan, 2010. "The effect of a change in teaching structure on student performance," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 148-161, July.
    7. Amondarain, Josune & Aldazabal, M. Edurne & Espinosa-Pike, Marcela, 2023. "Gender differences in the auditing stereotype and their influence on the intention to enter the profession," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    8. Carla Carvalho & Ana Carlos Almeida, 2022. "The Adequacy of Accounting Education in the Development of Transversal Skills Needed to Meet Market Demands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Florian Fuchs & Volker Lingnau, 2024. "The Homo Economicus as a Prototype of a Psychopath? A Conceptual Analysis and Implications for Business Research and Teaching," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(4), pages 763-777, December.
    10. Chao-Ming Wang & Bo-Ting Lee & Ting-Yun Lo, 2023. "The Design of a Novel Digital Puzzle Gaming System for Young Children’s Learning by Interactive Multi-Sensing and Tangible User Interfacing Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-43, February.
    11. Richard B. Dull & Lydia L. F. Schleifer & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2015. "Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students' Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 152-174, April.
    12. Tracey McDowall & Beverley Jackling, 2010. "Attitudes towards the accounting profession: an Australian perspective," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 30-49, May.
    13. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    14. Smith, Kenneth J. & Emerson, David J. & Mauldin, Shawn, 2021. "Online cheating at the intersection of the dark triad and fraud diamond," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    15. Marriott, Pru & Lau, Alice, 2008. "The use of on-line summative assessment in an undergraduate financial accounting course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 73-90.
    16. Francisco-Javier Hinojo-Lucena & Juan-Manuel Trujillo-Torres & José-Antonio Marín-Marín & Carmen Rodríguez-Jiménez, 2020. "B-Learning in Basic Vocational Training Students for the Development of the Module of Applied Sciences I," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Penne Ainsworth, 2001. "Changes in accounting curricula: discussion and design," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 279-297.
    18. Lucía Hilario & Marta Covadonga Mora & Nicolás Montés & Pantaleón David Romero & Sara Barquero, 2022. "Gamification for Maths and Physics in University Degrees through a Transportation Challenge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Hickey, Anna, 2019. "Accounting education literature review (2018)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-27.
    20. Siew Chin Wong & Jia Ying Lim & Chui Seong Lim & Kay Tze Hong, 2019. "An Empirical Study on Career Choices Among Undergraduates: A PLS-SEM Hierarchical Component Model (HCM) Approach," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 276-298, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5171-:d:375885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.