IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4615-d367710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Systems Integrated to the Building Envelope: Strategies and Technical Solution for the Italian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Santi

    (Department of Energy, Systems, Territory, and Constructions Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Angelo Bertolazzi

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy)

  • Emanuele Leporelli

    (Department of Energy, Systems, Territory, and Constructions Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Umberto Turrini

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy)

  • Giorgio Croatto

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy)

Abstract

Green roofs and green and living walls are increasingly seen in cities, because they are an important strategy that addresses some key urban environmental issues and allows the achievement of different benefits. Among these, the most relevant ones are reduction of the “Urban Heat Island” effect, of rainfall contributions to the sewer system, of environmental impact and energy saving, and retention of harmful substance. The study aims to analyze different systems of greenery systems integrated (GSI), green roofs (GR), and green and living walls (GW-LW), as a possible retrofit technique of the envelope of heritage buildings and especially their applications in the context of historic cities in Italy, pointing out positive and negative aspects. Particularly, it pays attention to the green retrofitting of buildings and to the technical problems related to the installation of systems, since at the moment there are already several studies that show the environmental and microclimatic benefits of the integration of vegetation in architecture. This study tries to highlight the series of design procedures necessary both in the preliminary phase and then in the executive phase to relate the GSI to the existing building envelopes. The GR, from the results of the simulations conducted, demonstrate a greater simplicity in their construction, with improvements also from the point of view of the working loads on the existing structures, since the interventions are performed more easily than those on the facade. The study highlights the architectural needs that are not always considered such as the increase in the thickness of the roof and the related need to raise its edges, changing the perspective of the building. On the other hand, the GW and the LW show some complexity in their construction because they must deal with facades often rich in decorative elements and where openings affect the assemblage and connection works such as the tinsmiths of the intrados of the openings. It must be taken into consideration the necessity of having to drill masonry, often inhomogeneous, to connect fixings and the problems of stability this entails must be carefully analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Santi & Angelo Bertolazzi & Emanuele Leporelli & Umberto Turrini & Giorgio Croatto, 2020. "Green Systems Integrated to the Building Envelope: Strategies and Technical Solution for the Italian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4615-:d:367710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc A. Rosen, 2013. "Engineering and Sustainability: Attitudes and Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Mario Maiolo & Behrouz Pirouz & Roberto Bruno & Stefania Anna Palermo & Natale Arcuri & Patrizia Piro, 2020. "The Role of the Extensive Green Roofs on Decreasing Building Energy Consumption in the Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Fabio Fantozzi & Caterina Gargari & Massimo Rovai & Giacomo Salvadori, 2019. "Energy Upgrading of Residential Building Stock: Use of Life Cycle Cost Analysis to Assess Interventions on Social Housing in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leo Capari & Harald Wilfing & Andreas Exner & Thomas Höflehner & Daniela Haluza, 2022. "Cooling the City? A Scientometric Study on Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure and Climate Change-Induced Public Health Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Alexander Pichlhöfer & Azra Korjenic & Abdulah Sulejmanovski & Erich Streit, 2023. "Influence of Facade Greening with Ivy on Thermal Performance of Masonry Walls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin Li & Weihong Guo & Xiao Liu & Yuqing Zhang & Peter John Russell & Marc Aurel Schnabel, 2021. "Sustainable Passive Design for Building Performance of Healthy Built Environment in the Lingnan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Behrouz Pirouz & Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas & Behzad Pirouz & Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas & Patrizia Piro, 2020. "Development of an Assessment Method for Investigating the Impact of Climate and Urban Parameters in Confirmed Cases of COVID-19: A New Challenge in Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Georges Atallah & Faris Tarlochan, 2021. "Comparison between Variable and Constant Refrigerant Flow Air Conditioning Systems in Arid Climate: Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Energy Savings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Natale Arcuri & Manuela De Ruggiero & Francesca Salvo & Raffaele Zinno, 2020. "Automated Valuation Methods through the Cost Approach in a BIM and GIS Integration Framework for Smart City Appraisals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Edson R. Marciotto & Marcos Vinicius Bueno de Morais, 2021. "Energetics of Urban Canopies: A Meteorological Perspective," J, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Emanuele Leporelli & Giovanni Santi, 2019. "From Psychology of Sustainability to Sustainability of Urban Spaces: Promoting a Primary Prevention Approach for Well-Being in the Healthy City Designing. A Waterfront Case Study in Livorno," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Rita Remeikienė & Ligita Gasparėnienė & Aleksandra Fedajev & Marek Szarucki & Marija Đekić & Jolita Razumienė, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development Progress in EU Member States in the Context of Building Renovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Behrouz Pirouz & Natale Arcuri & Behzad Pirouz & Stefania Anna Palermo & Michele Turco & Mario Maiolo, 2020. "Development of an Assessment Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Factories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Enrico Sicignano & Giacomo Di Ruocco & Anna Stabile, 2019. "Quali—A Quantitative Environmental Assessment Method According to Italian CAM, for the Sustainable Design of Urban Neighbourhoods in Mediterranean Climatic Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Teresa Nogueira & Rui Castro & José Magano, 2023. "Engineering Students Education in Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Emotional Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Marcelle Engler Bridi & Joao Soliman-Junior & Ariovaldo Denis Granja & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Vanessa Gomes & Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski, 2022. "Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Giovanni Santi & Emanuele Leporelli & Michele Di Sivo, 2019. "Improving Sustainability in Architectural Research: Biopsychosocial Requirements in the Design of Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas & Behrouz Pirouz & Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas & Behzad Pirouz & Patrizia Piro & Kyoung-Sae Na & Seo-Eun Cho & Zong Woo Geem, 2020. "Prioritizing and Analyzing the Role of Climate and Urban Parameters in the Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 Based on Artificial Intelligence Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Rosario Domingo & Marta María Marín & Juan Claver & Roque Calvo, 2015. "Selection of Cutting Inserts in Dry Machining for Reducing Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Fabiana Frota de Albuquerque Landi & Claudia Fabiani & Anna Laura Pisello, 2021. "Experimental Winter Monitoring of a Light-Weight Green Roof Assembly for Building Retrofit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Ángel Pitarch & María José Ruá & Lucía Reig & Inés Arín, 2020. "Contribution of Roof Refurbishment to Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Piero Bevilacqua & Stefania Perrella & Daniela Cirone & Roberto Bruno & Natale Arcuri, 2021. "Efficiency Improvement of Photovoltaic Modules via Back Surface Cooling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Bin Chang & Yuexi Dang & Xilian Luo & Chuck Wah Yu & Zhaolin Gu, 2020. "Sustainability of Evaporative Cooling System for Environment Control for Preservation of Unearthed Historical Sites within Archaeological Museums in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Xiaoyue Zhu & Bo Gao & Xudong Yang & Zhong Yu & Ji Ni, 2021. "Modifying Building Energy-Saving Design Based on Field Research into Climate Features and Local Residents’ Habits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Tomáš Mandičák & Peter Mésároš & Marcela Spišáková, 2021. "Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Sustainable Supply Chain and Cost Reducing of Waste Management in Slovak Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4615-:d:367710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.