IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2460-d226060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Sustainability in the Follow-Up and Evaluation Stage of Logistics Services Purchasing: Perspectives from UK Shippers and 3PLs

Author

Listed:
  • Witold Bahr

    (Aston Logistics & Systems Institute, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)

  • Edward Sweeney

    (Aston Logistics & Systems Institute, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)

Abstract

The purpose of the research described in this paper is to investigate the role played by the green agenda and sustainability in the follow-up and evaluation stage of the purchasing of logistics services. This stage is relatively under-explored in the extant academic literature. However, there is some evidence of a divergence between the perspectives of shippers and forwarders in this area. In this context, therefore, two carefully selected groups of UK-based supply chain management professionals—from shippers (i.e., manufacturers and retailers) and third-party logistics (3PLs)—were investigated using semi-structured interviews. The interviews were based on a data collection guide informed by the authors’ three overall research objectives. Data from the interviews were analysed using a combination of content analysis and grounded analysis. The findings suggest that, while shippers and 3PLs recognise a positive link between cost savings and the development of green initiatives, there is considerable room for improvement in this area in order to reorient the focus of the follow-up and evaluation stage from price and service levels towards sustainability. The authors’ exploratory research leads to the identification of a number of potentially fruitful areas for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Witold Bahr & Edward Sweeney, 2019. "Environmental Sustainability in the Follow-Up and Evaluation Stage of Logistics Services Purchasing: Perspectives from UK Shippers and 3PLs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2460-:d:226060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elodie Kacioui-Maurin & Jennifer Lazzeri & Valérie Michon, 2015. "The strategic intent of logistic service providers on three processes : French case," Post-Print hal-01428898, HAL.
    2. Panayides, Photis M. & So, Meko, 2005. "Logistics service provider-client relationships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 179-200, May.
    3. Pietro Evangelista & Lodovico Santoro & Antonio Thomas, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review from 2000–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-34, May.
    4. Joan Jané & Alfonso Ochoa, 2006. "The Handbook of Logistics Contracts," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-59758-7.
    5. Asoke Dey & Paul LaGuardia & Mahesh Srinivasan, 2011. "Building sustainability in logistics operations: a research agenda," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(11), pages 1237-1259, October.
    6. Riccardo Giusti & Chiara Iorfida & Yuanyuan Li & Daniele Manerba & Stefano Musso & Guido Perboli & Roberto Tadei & Shuai Yuan, 2019. "Sustainable and De-Stressed International Supply-Chains Through the SYNCHRO-NET Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes & Marianne Jahre, 2007. "Supply Chain Integration improves performance - The emperor’s new suit?," Post-Print hal-01419273, HAL.
    8. Jo Garcia & Julie Evans & Maggie Reshaw, 2004. "``Is There Anything Else You Would Like to Tell Us'' – Methodological Issues in the Use of Free-Text Comments from Postal Surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 113-125, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serban Raicu & Dorinela Costescu & Stefan Burciu, 2020. "Distribution System with Flow Consolidation at the Boundary of Urban Congested Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Alves Wellington & Silva Ângela & Rodrigues Helena Sofia, 2020. "Green Practices as a Path towards the Sustainability: Evidence from Portuguese Companies," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 7-20, October.
    3. Vitor Caldeirinha & J. Augusto Felício & Tiago Pinho, 2023. "Role of Cargo Owner in Logistic Chain Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Juan García-Álvarez de Perea & Carolina Ramírez-García & Aida Del Cubo-Molina, 2019. "Internationalization Business Models and Patterns of SMEs and MNEs: A Qualitative Multi-Case Study in the Agrifood Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Michal Košíček & Radek Tesař & František Dařena & Roman Malo & Arnošt Motyčka, 2012. "Route planning module as a part of Supply Chain Management system," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 135-142.
    4. Chu, Zhaofang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun, 2018. "Logistics service innovation by third party logistics providers in China: Aligning guanxi and organizational structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 291-307.
    5. Bo-Rui Yan & Qian-Li Dong & Qian Li & Fahim UI Amin & Jia-Ni Wu, 2021. "A Study on the Coupling and Coordination between Logistics Industry and Economy in the Background of High-Quality Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Di, Zhen & Yang, Lixing & Shi, Jungang & Zhou, Housheng & Yang, Kai & Gao, Ziyou, 2022. "Joint optimization of carriage arrangement and flow control in a metro-based underground logistics system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1-23.
    7. Enrico Massaroni & Alessandra Cozzolino & Mario Calabrese & Ewa Wankowicz & Maura Fiore, 2016. "Reporting di sostenibilit? degli operatori logistici in Europa: analisi degli indicatori," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 303-334.
    8. Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Roubaud, David & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim & Santibanez Gonzalez‬, Erne, 2021. "An original information entropy-based quantitative evaluation model for low-carbon operations in an emerging market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Wai Wong & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Aizzat Mohd. Nasurdin & Marini Mohamad, 2014. "The impact of external environmental on business process management and organizational performance," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(4), pages 559-586, December.
    10. Fadda, Edoardo & Manerba, Daniele & Cabodi, Gianpiero & Camurati, Paolo Enrico & Tadei, Roberto, 2021. "Comparative analysis of models and performance indicators for optimal service facility location," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Yun Hui Lin & Yuan Wang & Loo Hay Lee & Ek Peng Chew, 2021. "Robust facility location with structural complexity and demand uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 485-507, June.
    12. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2023. "Sustainable Evaluation of Major Third-Party Logistics Providers: A Framework of an MCDM-Based Entropy Objective Weighting Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    13. Graham, Stephanie & Graham, Byron & Holt, Diane, 2018. "The relationship between downstream environmental logistics practices and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 356-365.
    14. Chand, Pushpendu & Thakkar, Jitesh J. & Ghosh, Kunal Kanti, 2020. "Analysis of supply chain sustainability with supply chain complexity, inter-relationship study using delphi and interpretive structural modeling for Indian mining and earthmoving machinery industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Alexander Fianko Otchere & Jonathan Annan & Emanuel Kwabena Anin, 2013. "Achieving Competitive Advantage through Supply Chain Integration in the Cocoa Industry: A Case Study of Olam Ghana Limited and Produce Buying Company Limited," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 3(2), pages 131-145, February.
    16. Felix Kin Peng Hui & Lu Aye & Colin F. Duffield, 2019. "Engaging Employees with Good Sustainability: Key Performance Indicators for Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    17. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Breno Tostes de Gomes Garcia & Diana Mery Messias Lopes & Ilton Curty Leal Junior & José Carlos Cesar Amorim & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva & Vanessa de Almeida Guimarães, 2019. "Analysis of the Performance of Transporting Soybeans from Mato Grosso for Export: A Case Study of the Tapajós-Teles Pires Waterway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Szuster Mariusz & Szymczak Maciej, 2016. "Innovation, knowledge and information management in supply chains," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 26-36, March.
    20. Tiziana Modica & Sara Perotti & Marco Melacini, 2021. "Green Warehousing: Exploration of Organisational Variables Fostering the Adoption of Energy-Efficient Material Handling Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2460-:d:226060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.