IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p2103-d221079.html

Integrating Sustainability and Lean: SLIM Method and Enterprise Game Proposed

Author

Listed:
  • Ilie Mihai Tăucean

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, via Victoria Square No. 2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Matei Tămășilă

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, via Victoria Square No. 2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Larisa Ivascu

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, via Victoria Square No. 2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Șerban Miclea

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, via Victoria Square No. 2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Mircea Negruț

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, via Victoria Square No. 2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Sustainability and leanness are organizational approach concepts for more efficient activities and increased competitiveness. This paper presents a study and an application of the concepts of sustainability and lean, with the purpose to capitalize on the benefits of the two concepts’ tools when used together in an industry and education activity. A literature review was carried out to evaluate qualitatively and empirically the concepts of sustainability, lean, and enterprise games, and the possibility to integrate the first two concepts into a new tool applied into an enterprise game. An online survey was done to identify which tools are used within companies in the region, how and what training methods they used, and what the reported benefits are. The survey results were used to design a new tool integrated in a new enterprise game (SLIM) developed by the authors. The game was tested and validated in educational laboratory with students and actual employees from companies. The game follows the frame of an enterprise game, considering the simulation of enterprise classical functions. The game’s purpose is to improve the activity in successive rounds. A scorecard is used to fill in and compute the key performance indicators (KPIs), and a new indicator is proposed (SLIMx). Applications of the instrument/game include: students’ training in an educational laboratory; lifelong learning; professional training in companies; and professional perfection/reconversion of potential employees and the unemployed. The SLIM game was simulated in a team of 15 players over three rounds, with teachers playing the role of the supervisor. A number of possible improvements have been identified. The next step is testing it in enterprises with various fields of activity. SLIM has proven to be an effective solution to improve organizational efficiency and motivate players to gain new knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilie Mihai Tăucean & Matei Tămășilă & Larisa Ivascu & Șerban Miclea & Mircea Negruț, 2019. "Integrating Sustainability and Lean: SLIM Method and Enterprise Game Proposed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2103-:d:221079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florin IONITA & Ion COCHINA & Darko SHULESKI, 2015. "Never Stop Playing: Management Games As Valuable Training Tools," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 266-277, November.
    2. Anass Cherrafi & Said Elfezazi & Kannan Govindan & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes & Khalid Benhida & Ahmed Mokhlis, 2017. "A framework for the integration of Green and Lean Six Sigma for superior sustainability performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 4481-4515, August.
    3. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    4. Wenchi Shou & Jun Wang & Peng Wu & Xiangyu Wang & Heap-Yih Chong, 2017. "A cross-sector review on the use of value stream mapping," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(13), pages 3906-3928, July.
    5. Tartavulea Ramona Iulia & Belu Mihaela Gabriela & Paraschiv Dorel Mihai, 2012. "Using Business Simulation as a Complementary Educational Method in Universities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 138-142, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paula Morella & María Pilar Lambán & Jesús Royo & Juan Carlos Sánchez & Lisbeth del Carmen Ng Corrales, 2020. "Development of a New Green Indicator and Its Implementation in a Cyber–Physical System for a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Ming-Hui Liao & Chi-Tai Wang, 2021. "Using Enterprise Architecture to Integrate Lean Manufacturing, Digitalization, and Sustainability: A Lean Enterprise Case Study in the Chemical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Luis Fonseca & José Carlos Sá & Vanda Lima, 2025. "Evaluating the Synergy Between Lean Practices and Sustainability in Supply Chains: A Conceptual Framework for Supplier Assessment," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 352-380, November.
    4. Carina L. Gargalo & Eduardo Pereda Pons & Ana Paula Barbosa-Povoa & Ana Carvalho, 2021. "A Lean Approach to Developing Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-33, March.
    5. Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Larisa Ivascu & Attila Turi & Alin Artene & George Artur Găman, 2019. "Sustainable Development Model for the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Kleber F. Barcia & Lizzi Garcia-Castro & Jorge Abad-Moran, 2022. "Lean Six Sigma Impact Analysis on Sustainability Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Lusia Permata Sari Hartanti & Ivan Gunawan & Ig. Jaka Mulyana & Herwinarso Herwinarso, 2022. "Identification of Waste Based on Lean Principles as the Way towards Sustainability of a Higher Education Institution: A Case Study from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    2. Mohsin Malik & Salam Abdallah, 2019. "Sustainability Initiatives in Emerging Economies: A Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Walker, Nathan L. & Styles, David & Coughlan, Paul & Williams, A. Prysor, 2022. "Cross-sector sustainability benchmarking of major utilities in the United Kingdom," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Kramat Hussain & Sun Huaping & Muhammad Waqas & Muzaffar Iqbal, 2025. "Drivers, Barriers and Enablers Influencing Green, Lean Six Sigma Adoption in the Construction Industry: A Developing Economy’s Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    5. Murat Gunduz & Ayman Fahmi Naser, 2017. "Cost Based Value Stream Mapping as a Sustainable Construction Tool for Underground Pipeline Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Sasha Shahbazi & Martin Kurdve & Mats Zackrisson & Christina Jönsson & Anna Runa Kristinsdottir, 2019. "Comparison of Four Environmental Assessment Tools in Swedish Manufacturing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Diego Tlapa & Ignacio Franco-Alucano & Jorge Limon-Romero & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Guilherme Tortorella, 2022. "Lean, Six Sigma, and Simulation: Evidence from Healthcare Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Aitor Goti & Alberto De la Calle & María José Gil & Ander Errasti & Pedro R. D. Bom & Pablo García-Bringas, 2018. "Development and Application of an Assessment Complement for Production System Audits Based on Data Quality, IT Infrastructure, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Carlos Zepeda-Lugo & Diego Tlapa & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Jorge Limon-Romero & Sinue Ontiveros & Armando Perez-Sanchez & Guilherme Tortorella, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Lean Healthcare on Inpatient Care: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Hamed Gholami & Norhazrina Jamil & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Dalia Streimikiene & Safian Sharif & Norhayati Zakuan, 2021. "The application of Green Lean Six Sigma," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1913-1931, May.
    11. Cherrafi, Anass & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Kumar, Vikas & Mishra, Nishikant & Ghobadian, Abby & Elfezazi, Said, 2018. "Lean, green practices and process innovation: A model for green supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 79-92.
    12. Amna Farrukh & Sanjay Mathrani & Aymen Sajjad, 2022. "A natural resource and institutional theory‐based view of green‐lean‐six sigma drivers for environmental management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1074-1090, March.
    13. Noureddine Dahmani & Amine Belhadi & Khalid Benhida & Said Elfezazi & Fatima Ezahra Touriki & Yassine Azougagh, 2022. "Integrating lean design and eco-design to improve product design: From literature review to an operational framework," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(1), pages 189-219, February.
    14. Juan A. Marin-Garcia & Pilar I. Vidal-Carreras & Julio J. Garcia-Sabater, 2021. "The Role of Value Stream Mapping in Healthcare Services: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2019. "The Effect of Lean Manufacturing on a Supply Chain Relationship and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Ali Bastas & Kapila Liyanage, 2018. "ISO 9001 and Supply Chain Integration Principles Based Sustainable Development: A Delphi Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-35, December.
    17. Fuzhen Liu & Kee-hung Lai & Wei Cai, 2021. "Responsible Production for Sustainability: Concept Analysis and Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    18. Maryam Pervez Khan & Noraini Abu Talib & Tan Owee Kowang, 2018. "Development of Sustainability Framework Based On the Theory of Resource Based View," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 636-647, July.
    19. Wen, Xuanhao & Cao, Huajun & Hon, Bernard & Chen, Erheng & Li, Hongcheng, 2021. "Energy value mapping: A novel lean method to integrate energy efficiency into production management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Saima Khan & Ghulam Abbas Bhatti & Muhammad Jamshed Khan & Muhammad Nawaz, 2026. "Evaluating the critical factors of building information modeling implementation using ordinal priority approach and grey relational analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 4577-4594, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2103-:d:221079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.