IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1697-d215832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Introduction of Insect Meal into Fish Diet: The First Economic Analysis on European Sea Bass Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Brunella Arru

    (Department of Agriculture—University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari (SS), Italy)

  • Roberto Furesi

    (Department of Agriculture—University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari (SS), Italy)

  • Laura Gasco

    (Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco (To), Italy)

  • Fabio A. Madau

    (Department of Agriculture—University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari (SS), Italy)

  • Pietro Pulina

    (Department of Agriculture—University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari (SS), Italy)

Abstract

The economic and environmental sustainability of aquaculture depends significantly on the nature and quality of the fish feed used. One of the main criticisms of aquaculture is the need to use significant amounts of fish meal, and other marine protein sources, in such feed. Unfortunately, the availability of the oceanic resources, typically used to produce fish feed, cannot be utilized indefinitely to cover the worldwide feed demand caused by ever-increasing aquaculture production. In light of these considerations, this study estimates how aquaculture farm economic outcomes can change by introducing insect meal into the diet of cultivated fish. Several possible economic effects are simulated, based on various scenarios, with different percentages of insect flour in the feed and varying meal prices using a case study of a specialized off-shore sea bass farm in Italy. The findings indicate that the introduction of insect meal—composed of Tenebrio molitor —would increase feeding costs due to the high market prices of this flour and its less convenient feed conversion ratio than that of fish meal. Therefore, the expected environmental benefits of using this highly promising insect meal in fish feed do not align with the current economic interests of the aquaculture industry. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this theme, and it must be noted that our findings cannot be generalized widely because a specific case study was used. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that efforts should be made—at least at the farm level—to find profitable ways to encourage the introduction of this attractive alternative to guarantee both economic and environmental sustainability in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Laura Gasco & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina, 2019. "The Introduction of Insect Meal into Fish Diet: The First Economic Analysis on European Sea Bass Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1697-:d:215832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Bonaventura Forleo & Luca Romagnoli & Nadia Palmieri & Angela Di Nocera, 2018. "Assessing the efficiency of aquaculture cooperatives. A country case study," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(2), pages 205-220.
    2. Guzhen Zhou & Wuyang Hu & Wenchao Huang, 2016. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Sustainable Products? A Study of Eco-Labeled Tuna Steak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Kleih, Ulrich & Linton, John & Marr, Ana & Mactaggart, Murdoch & Naziri, Diego & Orchard, John E., 2013. "Financial services for small and medium-scale aquaculture and fisheries producers," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 106-114.
    4. John P. Volpe & Jennifer L.M. Gee & Valerie A. Ethier & Martina Beck & Amanda J. Wilson & Jenna M.S. Stoner, 2013. "Global Aquaculture Performance Index (GAPI): The First Global Environmental Assessment of Marine Fish Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio A. Madau & Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina, 2020. "Insect Farming for Feed and Food Production from a Circular Business Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Chloé Phan Van PhI & Maye Walraven & Marine Bézagu & Maxime Lefranc & Clément Ray, 2020. "Industrial Symbiosis in Insect Production—A Sustainable Eco-Efficient and Circular Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Brunella Arru & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina & Fabio A. Madau, 2022. "Price Sensitivity of Fish Fed with Insect Meal: An Analysis on Italian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Lorenzo A. Cadinu & Paolo Barra & Francesco Torre & Francesco Delogu & Fabio A. Madau, 2020. "Insect Rearing: Potential, Challenges, and Circularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Jessica Petereit & Christina Hoerterer & Adrian A. Bischoff-Lang & Luís E. C. Conceição & Gabriella Pereira & Johan Johansen & Roberto Pastres & Bela H. Buck, 2022. "Adult European Seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ) Perform Well on Alternative Circular-Economy-Driven Feed Formulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Caven Mguvane Mnisi & Chika Ethelbert Oyeagu & Oziniel Ruzvidzo, 2022. "Mopane Worm ( Gonimbrasia belina Westwood) Meal as a Potential Protein Source for Sustainable Quail Production: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria B. Forleo & Nadia Palmieri, 2023. "Environmental Attributes of Wild versus Farmed Tuna: Beliefs, Knowledge and Purchasing Choices of Italian Consumers of Canned Tuna," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Yongyong Fu & Jinsong Deng & Ziran Ye & Muye Gan & Ke Wang & Jing Wu & Wu Yang & Guoqiang Xiao, 2019. "Coastal Aquaculture Mapping from Very High Spatial Resolution Imagery by Combining Object-Based Neighbor Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Jesse Sherry & Jennifer Koester, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Aquaculture Stewardship Council Certified Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Mariusz Izdebski & Marianna Jacyna, 2021. "An Efficient Hybrid Algorithm for Energy Expenditure Estimation for Electric Vehicles in Urban Service Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Armando Cartenì & Ilaria Henke & Clorinda Molitierno & Luigi Di Francesco, 2020. "Strong Sustainability in Public Transport Policies: An e-Mobility Bus Fleet Application in Sorrento Peninsula (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Domenico Carlucci & Biagia De Devitiis & Gianluca Nardone & Fabio Gaetano Santeramo, 2017. "Certification Labels Versus Convenience Formats: What Drives the Market in Aquaculture Products?," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(3), pages 295-310.
    7. Steven Gronau & Etti Winter & Ulrike Grote, 2020. "Aquaculture, fish resources and rural livelihoods: a village CGE analysis from Namibia’s Zambezi Region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 615-642, February.
    8. Villasante, Sebastian & Rivero Rodríguez, Susana & Molares, Yolanda & Martínez, Mercedes & Remiro, Javier & García-Díez, Cristina & Lahoz, Carmen & Omar, Isabel & Bechardas, Margarida & Elago, Pan, 2015. "Are provisioning ecosystem services from rural aquaculture contributing to reduce hunger in Africa?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 365-377.
    9. Jir? Zelen? & Lucie Plz?kov? & Jan H?n & Jan Ka?par, 2020. ""Pale Lager and Double Carp Fries, Please". The McDonaldization of the Culinary Culture in the Czech Republic," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(1), pages 1-26.
    10. Steiner, B.E. & Peschel, A.O. & Grebitus, C., 2017. "Multi-Product Category Choices Labeled for Ecological Footprints: Exploring Psychographics and Evolved Psychological Biases for Characterizing Latent Consumer Classes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 251-264.
    11. Ning Zhang & Bing Wang, 2016. "Toward a Sustainable Low-Carbon China: A Review of the Special Issue of “Energy Economics and Management”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
    12. Christian Mullon & Charles Mullon, 2016. "A constraint-based framework to study rationality, competition and cooperation in fisheries," Papers 1605.08166, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2017.
    13. Ali Bastas, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies: A Systematic Review of Latest Trends and Themes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Vibhuti Dhingra & Harish Krishnan, 2021. "Managing Reputation Risk in Supply Chains: The Role of Risk Sharing Under Limited Liability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4845-4862, August.
    15. Patrizia Gazzola & Gianluca Colombo & Roberta Pezzetti & Luminița Nicolescu, 2017. "Consumer Empowerment in the Digital Economy: Availing Sustainable Purchasing Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Pulina, P. & Arru, B. & Madau, F.A. & Furesi, R. & Gasco, L., 2018. "Insect Meal in the Fish Diet and Feeding Cost: First Economic Simulations on European Sea bass Farming by a Case Study in Italy," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275929, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Lucio CECCHINI & Biancamaria TORQUATI & Massimo CHIORRI, 2018. "Sustainable agri-food products: A review of consumer preference studies through experimental economics," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(12), pages 554-565.
    18. Sergio Vitale & Federica Biondo & Cristina Giosuè & Gioacchino Bono & Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala & Ignazio Piazza & Mario Sprovieri & Vito Pipitone, 2020. "Consumers’ Perception and Willingness to Pay for Eco-Labeled Seafood in Italian Hypermarkets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Zelený, Jiří & Plzáková, Lucie & Hán, Jan & Kašpar, Jan, 2020. "“Pale Lager and Double Carp Fries, Please”. The McDonaldization of the Culinary Culture in the Czech Republic," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 22(1), April.
    20. Kai-Lih Chen & Wei-Hsin Kong & Chi-Cheng Chen & Je-Liang Liou, 2021. "Evaluating Benefits of Eco-Agriculture: The Cases of Farms along Taiwan’s East Coast in Yilan and Hualien," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1697-:d:215832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.