IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1531-d213619.html

Multilevel Coordination and Cooperation during Implementing Supranational Environmental Legislation: A Case Study on Invasive Alien Species

Author

Listed:
  • A. Iasmina Roman

    (Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna, 1030 Wien, Austria)

  • Volker Mauerhofer

    (Environmental Law Centre, Meiji University, Tokyo 101-8301, Japan)

Abstract

Coordination and cooperation are necessary topics to strengthen international environmental agreements that improve action against worldwide challenges towards sustainable development and environmental protection, such as invasive alien species (IAS). This study aims to assess to what extent national and transnational cooperation and coordination influences the implementation of a supranational regulation against IAS based on an example from the European Union (EU). Data is used from a broader study, including 47 responses to an online questionnaire and 22 interviews completed by experts from two countries (Austria and Romania), together with in depth literature. Additionally, the IAS-Regulation is analyzed from the perspective of cooperation and coordination. The terms “cooperation” and “coordination” were found within the text of the IAS-Regulation 11 and nine times respectively, whereas their context was transnational and national levels mainly, and transnational, respectively. It was further acknowledged from the majority of the answers from the survey respondents that the national coordination and cooperation is weaker than the transnational level due to the influence of the national competence distribution. Results from the interviews are separated into ‘transnational’ and ‘national’ cooperation and coordination. They show that the majority of the 47 responses indicate that the distribution of competence is one of the main influencing factors on the implementation. It is concluded that the current situation of cooperation and coordination in Austria and Romania renders it difficult for the European Commission to receive a realistic view about IAS and the implementation of the IAS Regulation in the two countries; hence, it is difficult to offer helpful support especially due to poor national cooperation. The current study can serve as a blueprint for further studies. Even in regional integration contexts beyond the EU, it can prove helpful to assess the impact of different kinds of competence distribution on the implementation of common norms. Thus, this research can path the way innovatively and serve as a comparative example for similar future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Iasmina Roman & Volker Mauerhofer, 2019. "Multilevel Coordination and Cooperation during Implementing Supranational Environmental Legislation: A Case Study on Invasive Alien Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1531-:d:213619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauerhofer, V. & Laza, I., 2018. "How do ecosystem services perform in enforceable law? Potentials and pitfalls within regional and national integration," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 260-270.
    2. Raakjaer, Jesper & Leeuwen, Judith van & Tatenhove, Jan van & Hadjimichael, Maria, 2014. "Ecosystem-based marine management in European regional seas calls for nested governance structures and coordination—A policy brief," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 373-381.
    3. Angelstam, Per & Barnes, Garth & Elbakidze, Marine & Marais, Christo & Marsh, Alex & Polonsky, Sarah & Richardson, David M. & Rivers, Nina & Shackleton, Ross T. & Stafford, William, 2017. "Collaborative learning to unlock investments for functional ecological infrastructure: Bridging barriers in social-ecological systems in South Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 291-304.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Iasmina Roman & Volker Mauerhofer, 2022. "Sustainable development and invasive alien species: Implementation challenges of an EU regulation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 477-488, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiasson, Guy & Angelstam, Per & Axelsson, Robert & Doyon, Frederik, 2019. "Towards collaborative forest planning in Canadian and Swedish hinterlands: Different institutional trajectories?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 334-345.
    2. Hendriksen, Astrid & Jouanneau, Charlène & Koss, Rebecca & Raakjaer, Jesper, 2014. "Fishing for opinions: Stakeholder views on MSFD implementation in European Seas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 353-363.
    3. Raakjær, Jesper & van Tatenhove, Jan, 2014. "Marine governance of European Seas: Introduction," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 323-324.
    4. Fanqi Zou & Tinghui Li, 2022. "The Impact of Agricultural Ecological Capital Investment on the Development of Green Circular Economy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Angelstam, Per & Elbakidze, Marine & Axelsson, Robert & Khoroshev, Alexander & Pedroli, Bas & Tysiachniouk, Maria & Zabubenin, Evgeny, 2019. "Model forests in Russia as landscape approach: Demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 96-110.
    6. Sigwela, Ayanda & Elbakidze, Marine & Powell, Mike & Angelstam, Per, 2017. "Defining core areas of ecological infrastructure to secure rural livelihoods in South Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 272-280.
    7. Remy Jonkam Oben & Mehdi Seraj & Şerife Zihni Eyüpoğlu, 2025. "Determinants of blue economy Growth in EU fisheries waters: MMQR and quantile-on-quantile analyses," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(4), pages 1-41, December.
    8. Michael Manton & Per Angelstam, 2018. "Defining Benchmarks for Restoration of Green Infrastructure: A Case Study Combining the Historical Range of Variability of Habitat and Species’ Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Deely, John & Hynes, Stephen & Barquín, José & Burgess, Diane & Finney, Graham & Silió, Ana & Álvarez-Martínez, Jose Manuel & Bailly, Denis & Ballé-Béganton, Johanna, 2020. "Barrier identification framework for the implementation of blue and green infrastructures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Ogbo O.G & Amaechi M. & Okonkwo U.C., 2024. "Environmental and Social Impact of Sand Mining Activities Along the Odene-Aguleri River, Anambra State Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(6), pages 193-207, June.
    11. Rasmussen, Laura Vang & Fold, Niels & Olesen, Rasmus Skov & Shackleton, Sheona, 2021. "Socio-economic outcomes of ecological infrastructure investments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    12. Hubert Paridaens & Theo Notteboom, 2021. "National Integrated Maritime Policies (IMP): Vision Formulation, Regional Embeddedness, and Institutional Attributes for Effective Policy Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Rodgers, Waymond & Degbey, William Y. & Housel, Thomas J. & Arslan, Ahmad, 2020. "Microfoundations of collaborative networks: The impact of social capital formation and learning on investment risk assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Moaaz Kabil & Setiawan Priatmoko & Róbert Magda & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Blue Economy and Coastal Tourism: A Comprehensive Visualization Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Rui Yang & Yingwen Chen & Jie Zhong & Yujin Xu & Xin An, 2024. "A systematic knowledge pedigree analysis on green governance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 13611-13640, June.
    16. Elena Bisinicu & Valeria Abaza & Laura Boicenco & Filimon Adrian & George-Emanuel Harcota & Oana Marin & Andra Oros & Elena Pantea & Alina Spinu & Florin Timofte & George Tiganov & Oana Vlas & Luminit, 2024. "Spatial Cumulative Assessment of Impact Risk-Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management for Enhanced Sustainability and Biodiversity in the Black Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    17. Jouanneau, Charlène & Raakjær, Jesper, 2014. "‘The Hare and the Tortoise’: Lessons from Baltic Sea and Mediterranean Sea governance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 331-338.
    18. de Vos, B.I. & Döring, R. & Aranda, M. & Buisman, F.C. & Frangoudes, K. & Goti, L. & Macher, C. & Maravelias, C.D. & Murillas-Maza, A. & van der Valk, O. & Vasilakopoulos, P., 2016. "New modes of fisheries governance: Implementation of the landing obligation in four European countries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-8.
    19. Eliasen, Søren Q. & Hegland, Troels J. & Raakjær, Jesper, 2015. "Decentralising: The implementation of regionalisation and co-management under the post-2013 Common Fisheries Policy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 224-232.
    20. Röckmann, Christine & van Leeuwen, Judith & Goldsborough, David & Kraan, Marloes & Piet, Gerjan, 2015. "The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 155-162.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1531-:d:213619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.