IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1334-d210704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability as a Framework for Considering Gene Drive Mice for Invasive Rodent Eradication

Author

Listed:
  • S. Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling

    (Department of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Megan Serr

    (Department of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Dimitri V. Blondel

    (Department of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • John Godwin

    (Department of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

Abstract

Gene drives represent a dynamic and controversial set of technologies with applications that range from mosquito control to the conservation of biological diversity on islands. Currently, gene drives are being developed in mice that may one day serve as an important tool for reducing invasive rodent pests, a key threat to island biodiversity and economies. Gene drives in mice are still in development in laboratories, and wild release of modified mice is likely a distant reality. However, technological changes outpace the existing capacity of regulatory frameworks, and thus require integrated governance frameworks. We suggest sustainability—which gives equal consideration to the environment, economy, and society—as one framework for addressing complexity and uncertainty in the governance of emerging gene drive technologies for invasive species management. We explore the impacts of rodent gene drives on island environments, including potential conservation and restoration of island biodiversity. We outline considerations for rodent gene drives on island economies, including impacts on agricultural and tourism losses, and reductions in biosecurity costs. Finally, we address the social dimension as an essential space for deliberation that will be integral to evaluating the potential deployment of gene drive rodents on islands.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling & Megan Serr & Dimitri V. Blondel & John Godwin, 2019. "Sustainability as a Framework for Considering Gene Drive Mice for Invasive Rodent Eradication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1334-:d:210704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas A. J. Graham & Shaun K. Wilson & Peter Carr & Andrew S. Hoey & Simon Jennings & M. Aaron MacNeil, 2018. "Seabirds enhance coral reef productivity and functioning in the absence of invasive rats," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7713), pages 250-253, July.
    2. Kevin M Esvelt & Neil J Gemmell, 2017. "Conservation demands safe gene drive," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-8, November.
    3. Gillespie, Robert & Bennett, Jeff, 2017. "Costs and Benefits of Rodent Eradication on Lord Howe Island, Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 215-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. JesseL. Reynolds, 2020. "Governing New Biotechnologies for Biodiversity Conservation: GeneDrives, International Law, and Emerging Politics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(3), pages 28-48, August.
    2. Frieß, Johannes L. & Lalyer, Carina R. & Giese, Bernd & Simon, Samson & Otto, Mathias, 2023. "Review of gene drive modelling and implications for risk assessment of gene drive organisms," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    3. Rudy Vannevel & Peter L.M. Goethals, 2020. "Identifying Ecosystem Key Factors to Support Sustainable Water Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Hartley, Sarah & Ledingham, Katie & Owen, Richard & Leonelli, Sabina & Diarra, Samba & Diop, Samba, 2021. "Experimenting with co-development: A qualitative study of gene drive research for malaria control in Mali," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1334-:d:210704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.