IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p903-d204710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Common Reed Fiber Become an Effective Construction Material? Physical, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Mortar Mixture Containing Common Reed Fiber

Author

Listed:
  • Chang-Seon Shon

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Temirlan Mukashev

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Deuckhang Lee

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Dichuan Zhang

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Jong R. Kim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Due to the increased demands of adapting the sustainability concept in the construction industry, many researchers have developed and evaluated the composite materials made with agricultural by-products, such as straws, fruit-shells, and cobs, as construction materials. Because no research work has been reported regarding the incorporation of common reed fiber (CRF) into a concrete composite to produce the green and sustainable concrete, this research has focused on the evaluation of physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of mortar mixture containing CRF regarding density, porosity, compressive and flexural strengths, and thermal conductivity. In total, six mixtures with 0%, 2%, 4%, and 6% CRF; 0.5% steel fiber (SF); and the combination of 6% CRF and 0.5% SF were prepared. Based on the experimental outputs, a simple analysis of heat loss was also been performed. The test results presented that the incorporation of CRF into mortar mixture proportionally reduced its unit weight and significantly increased its absorption capacity and porosity. Although the use of only CRF in the mortar mixture did not improve both compressive and flexural strengths compared to the plain mixture, the combined use of CRF and SF to increase both compressive and flexural strengths generated a synergetic effect to increase both strengths. The addition of CRF to the mixture has the benefit of producing a significant decrease in heat loss for a typical building in Astana due to the lower thermal conductivity and higher porosity to density ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang-Seon Shon & Temirlan Mukashev & Deuckhang Lee & Dichuan Zhang & Jong R. Kim, 2019. "Can Common Reed Fiber Become an Effective Construction Material? Physical, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Mortar Mixture Containing Common Reed Fiber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:903-:d:204710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramadhan W. Salim & Julius M. Ndambuki & David A. Adedokun, 2014. "Improving the Bearing Strength of Sandy Loam Soil Compressed Earth Block Bricks Using Sugercane Bagasse Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Kes McCormick & Niina Kautto, 2013. "The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Feraidon Ataie, 2018. "Influence of Rice Straw Fibers on Concrete Strength and Drying Shrinkage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosa Caponetto & Massimo Cuomo & Maurizio Detommaso & Giada Giuffrida & Antonio Lo Presti & Francesco Nocera, 2023. "Performance Assessment of Giant Reed-Based Building Components," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Gerardo Araya-Letelier & Pablo Maturana & Miguel Carrasco & Federico Carlos Antico & María Soledad Gómez, 2019. "Mechanical-Damage Behavior of Mortars Reinforced with Recycled Polypropylene Fibers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Azim Baibagyssov & Niels Thevs & Sabir Nurtazin & Rainer Waldhardt & Volker Beckmann & Ruslan Salmurzauly, 2020. "Biomass Resources of Phragmites australis in Kazakhstan: Historical Developments, Utilization, and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Alana Silva & Florindo Gaspar & Aliaksandr Bakatovich, 2023. "Composite Materials of Rice Husk and Reed Fibers for Thermal Insulation Plates Using Sodium Silicate as a Binder," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun-Xi Deng & Xiao Li & Xiao-Juan Li & Tai-Bing Wei, 2023. "Research on the Performance of Recycled-Straw Insulating Concrete and Optimization Design of Matching Ratio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Marquina, Jesús & Colinet, María José & Pablo-Romero, María del P., 2021. "The economic value of olive sector biomass for thermal and electrical uses in Andalusia (Spain)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Benoit Mougenot & Jean-Pierre Doussoulin, 2022. "Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1031-1047, January.
    6. Matteo De Besi & Kes McCormick, 2015. "Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    8. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo & Moreira, María Teresa & González-García, Sara, 2023. "Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Jana Poláková, 2018. "Sustainability—Risk—Resilience: How Does the Case of the Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions Measure up?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Troxler, David & Zabel, Astrid, 2021. "Clearing forests to make way for a sustainable economy transition in Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Yuichi Tei & Gheorghe Savoiu, 2018. "From Bioeconomics to Bioeconopysis in the Context of (Bio)Diversity and Modern Morality," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 754-754, August.
    14. Farhad Mukhtarov & Andrea Gerlak & Robin Pierce, 2017. "Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(6), pages 1010-1028, September.
    15. Thiago B. Murari & Aloisio S. Nascimento Filho & Eder J.A.L. Pereira & Paulo Ferreira & Sergio Pitombo & Hernane B.B. Pereira & Alex A.B. Santos & Marcelo A. Moret, 2019. "Comparative Analysis between Hydrous Ethanol and Gasoline C Pricing in Brazilian Retail Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    16. Lovrić, Marko & Lovrić, Nataša & Mavsar, Robert, 2020. "Mapping forest-based bioeconomy research in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    17. Kilham, Philipp & Hartebrodt, Christoph & Schraml, Ulrich, 2019. "A conceptual model for private forest owners' harvest decisions: A qualitative study in southwest Germany," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Adamowicz, Mieczysław, 2020. "Bioeconomy as A Concept for The Development of Agriculture and Agribusiness," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311272, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    19. Liobikiene, Genovaite & Chen, Xueli & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2020. "The trends in bioeconomy development in the European Union: Exploiting capacity and productivity measures based on the land footprint approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Bauer, Fredric & Coenen, Lars & Hansen, Teis & McCormick, Kes & Palgan, Yuliya Voytenko, 2016. "Technological innovation systems for biorefineries – A review of the literature," Papers in Innovation Studies 2016/27, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:903-:d:204710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.