IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p463-d198403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring “Company Personas” for Informing Design for Sustainability Implementation in Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Faheem Ali

    (Department of Design, Faculty of Architecture and Design, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering (DTU MAN), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Raphaëlle Stewart

    (Department of Design, Faculty of Architecture and Design, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering (DTU MAN), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Casper Boks

    (Department of Design, Faculty of Architecture and Design, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Niki Bey

    (Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering (DTU MAN), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

The need for understanding the context of the case company during Design for Sustainability (DfS) implementation has been a long identified need among the researchers in the field. Yet, studies on company context have primarily focused on studying, enlisting, and prescribing standardized solutions for companies or clustering companies based on similarities. Such approaches have not been able to overcome the organizational “soft side” challenges that have been long addressed in DfS literature. This explorative paper takes insights from 20 case interviews conducted in Norwegian and Danish manufacturing companies and with sustainability experts and uses the concept of persona from design studies to explore the potential of defining “company personas” to better define the context of the company. The interview analysis produced 14 dimensions, including both hitherto identified factual needs of companies and soft-side elements required to create a company persona, thereby informing practitioners and researchers to take a DfS implementation approach tailored to the company context.

Suggested Citation

  • Faheem Ali & Raphaëlle Stewart & Casper Boks & Niki Bey, 2019. "Exploring “Company Personas” for Informing Design for Sustainability Implementation in Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:463-:d:198403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobias Hahn & Mandy Scheermesser, 2006. "Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 150-165, July.
    2. Kristen Skelton & Rikke Dorothea Huulgaard & Kirsten Schmidt, 2016. "Understanding ecodesign through a communities of practice perspective," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 40-58.
    3. Elli Verhulst & Casper Boks, 2012. "The role of human factors in the adoption of sustainable design criteria in business: evidence from Belgian and Dutch case studies," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 146-163.
    4. Raphaëlle Stewart & Faheem Ali & Casper Boks & Niki Bey, 2018. "Architect, Catalyst, Advocate, and Prophet: A Four-Lens View of Companies to Support Ecodesign Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raphaëlle Stewart & Faheem Ali & Casper Boks & Niki Bey, 2018. "Architect, Catalyst, Advocate, and Prophet: A Four-Lens View of Companies to Support Ecodesign Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Hörisch, Jacob & Ortas, Eduardo & Schaltegger, Stefan & Álvarez, Igor, 2015. "Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: An empirical analysis of large companies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-249.
    3. Scott Victor Valentine, 2010. "The Green Onion: a corporate environmental strategy framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(5), pages 284-298, September.
    4. Mariëtte van Huijstee & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "The practice of stakeholder dialogue between multinationals and NGOs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 298-310, September.
    5. Ramme, Iris & Heimann, Ruth, 2015. "Green packaging from a company’s perspective: Determining factors for packaging solutions in the German fruit juice industry," MPRA Paper 65632, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Mihai STOICA, 2023. "Organic Food Positioning: How Do Companies Want Their Brand To Be Perceived By Consumers?," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 61-93, May.
    7. Mehmet Ulus & Burcin Hatipoglu, 2016. "Human Aspect as a Critical Factor for Organization Sustainability in the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Sarah Elena Windolph & Dorli Harms & Stefan Schaltegger, 2014. "Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management: Contrasting Survey Results and Implementation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 272-285, September.
    9. Yakup Durmaz & Ahmet Fidanoğlu, 2024. "The regulatory role of sustainable product design media and environmental performance in the impact of the Covid-19 epidemic on corporate sustainability: an application in Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 931-946, January.
    10. Matthias S. Fifka & Nicola Berg, 2014. "Managing Corporate Social Responsibility For The Sake Of Business And Society," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 253-257, September.
    11. Jacob Hörisch & Matthew P. Johnson & Stefan Schaltegger, 2015. "Implementation of Sustainability Management and Company Size: A Knowledge‐Based View," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 765-779, December.
    12. Marlies van Tilburg & Harold Krikke & Wim Lambrechts, 2022. "Supply Chain Relationships in Circular Business Models: Supplier Tactics at Royal Smit Transformers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Kimitaka Nishitani & Thi Bich Hue Nguyen & Katsuhiko Kokubu, 2025. "Does the economic motivation of firms to address the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promote the SDGs or merely SDG-washing? Critical empirical evidence from Japan and Vietnam," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 415-465, February.
    14. Maria Jesus Bonilla‐Priego & Juan‐José Nájera‐Sánchez & Xavier Font, 2022. "Beyond ethics: The transformational power of overlapping motivations in implementing strategic sustainability actions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 685-697, March.
    15. Burcu Demirel & Ibrahim Erol, 2016. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting in the BIST Sustainability Index," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(10), pages 21-31, October.
    16. Poisson-de Haro, Serge & Bitektine, Alex, 2015. "Global sustainability pressures and strategic choice: The role of firms’ structures and non-market capabilities in selection and implementation of sustainability initiatives," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 326-341.
    17. Evgeny A. Kuzmin & Marina V. Vinogradova & Valentina E. Guseva, 2019. "Projection of enterprise survival rate in dynamics of regional economic sustainability: case study of Russia and the EU," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1602-1617, June.
    18. Alvaro Plinio Pureza & Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility leadership for sustainable development: An institutional logics perspective in Brazil," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1410-1424, May.
    19. Nigel James Martin & John Lewis Rice, 2014. "Influencing Clean Energy Laws: an Analysis of Business Stakeholder Engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(7), pages 447-460, November.
    20. Fabio Neves Puglieri & Aldo Roberto Ometto & Rodrigo Salvador & Murillo Vetroni Barros & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Izabella Morré Rodrigues & Octavio Diegoli Netto, 2020. "An Environmental and Operational Analysis of Quality Function Deployment-Based Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:463-:d:198403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.