IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4660-d188692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective Civic Petitions in Urban Neighborhoods: A Comparative Study between Two Different-Tier Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Le Tang

    (Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China)

  • Fengqin Zhou

    (Faculty of Foreign Language, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China)

  • Xueliang Feng

    (Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China)

  • Yali Luo

    (Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China)

Abstract

This paper engages with civic development in urban neighborhoods in China after the period of reform that began in 1978. Examining the collective civic petitions that have occurred in urban neighborhoods, the paper offers a comparative analysis of changing trends, internal mechanisms, and their spatial distribution between two different-tier cities. Data pertaining to the collective civic petitions was drawn from open archives in two municipal bureaus, and related to the years 2013 to 2015. The data was then split into three types of petition typology—claim, protest, and hybrid. Certain similarities and differences emerged from the analysis relating to the types of petition that have occurred against different petition counterparties, namely, state authorities, real developers, and property management companies. Similarities among the two cities could be capable of indicating advancing urban civic developments with internal mechanisms among petition typology and contexts of individual petitions. Differences among the two cities could be related to various differences in their urban contexts, and may also reflect different levels of citizen civic consciousness and behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Tang & Fengqin Zhou & Xueliang Feng & Yali Luo, 2018. "Collective Civic Petitions in Urban Neighborhoods: A Comparative Study between Two Different-Tier Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4660-:d:188692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4660/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4660/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Anas & Richard Arnott & Kenneth A. Small, 1998. "Urban Spatial Structure," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1426-1464, September.
    2. Charles Pattie & Patrick Seyd & Paul Whiteley, 2003. "Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behaviour in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51, pages 443-468, October.
    3. Charles Pattie & Patrick Seyd & Paul Whiteley, 2003. "Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behaviour in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(3), pages 443-468, October.
    4. Caiyun Qian & Yang Zhou & Ze Ji & Qing Feng, 2018. "The Influence of the Built Environment of Neighborhoods on Residents’ Low-Carbon Travel Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Paul C. Cheshire, 1979. "Inner Areas as Spatial Labour Markets: a Critique of the Inner Area Studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 29-43, February.
    6. Anping Chen & Mark D. Partridge, 2013. "When are Cities Engines of Growth in China? Spread and Backwash Effects across the Urban Hierarchy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1313-1331, September.
    7. Fulong Wu, 2015. "Commodification and housing market cycles in Chinese cities," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 6-26, January.
    8. Xiaoyuan Wan, 2016. "Governmentalities in everyday practices: The dynamic of urban neighbourhood governance in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2330-2346, August.
    9. Qiang Fu & Nan Lin, 2014. "The Weaknesses of Civic Territorial Organizations: Civic Engagement and Homeowners Associations in Urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2309-2327, November.
    10. Rhys Andrews, 2007. "Civic Culture and Public Service Failure: An Empirical Exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(4), pages 845-863, April.
    11. Shui-Yan Tang & Xueyong Zhan, 2008. "Civic Environmental NGOs, Civil Society, and Democratisation in China," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 425-448.
    12. Matthew Cohen & Arnim Wiek & Braden Kay & John Harlow, 2015. "Aligning Public Participation to Stakeholders’ Sustainability Literacy—A Case Study on Sustainable Urban Development in Phoenix, Arizona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Fulong Wu, 2007. "The Poverty of Transition: From Industrial District to Poor Neighbourhood in the City of Nanjing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(13), pages 2673-2694, December.
    14. Yu Chen & Yanrui Wu, 2012. "Regional Economic Growth and Spillover Effects: An Analysis of China's Pan Pearl River Delta Area," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 20(2), pages 80-97, March.
    15. Fulong Wu, 2015. "Commodification and housing market cycles in Chinese cities," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 6-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilde Coffe & Catherine Bolzendahl, 2011. "Gender Gaps in Political Participation Across Sub-Saharan African Nations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 245-264, June.
    2. Bennett, Kyle M. & Campbell, Jeanna M. & Hays, Scott P., 2022. "Engaging youth for positive change: A mixed methods evaluation of site level program implementation & outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song, 2019. "Perspectives of Socio-Spatial Differentiation from Soaring Housing Prices: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Shu‐Hen Chiang, 2012. "The Source of Metropolitan Growth: The Role of Commuting," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 143-166, March.
    5. Elizaveta Kopacheva, 2021. "Predicting online participation through Bayesian network analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Mengzhu Zhang & Si Qiao & Xiang Yan, 2021. "The secondary circuit of capital and the making of the suburban property boom in postcrisis Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1331-1355, September.
    7. Małgorzata Marks-Krzyszkowska & Krystyna Dzwonkowska-Godula & Anna Miklaszewska, 2022. "Types of Rural Residents in Central Poland in Terms of Their Local Participation: The Perspectives of the Local Authorities and the Inhabitants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Christopher Carman, 2010. "The Process is the Reality: Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Participatory Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(4), pages 731-751, October.
    9. Anna Liddo & Grazia Concilio, 2017. "Making Decision in Open Communities: Collective Actions in the Public Realm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 847-856, September.
    10. Natacha Aveline-Dubach & Guillaume Blandeau, 2019. "The political economy of transit value capture: The changing business model of the MTRC in Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3415-3431, December.
    11. Manuel B. Aalbers, 2017. "The Variegated Financialization of Housing," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 542-554, July.
    12. Isil Erol, 2019. "New Geographies of Residential Capitalism: Financialization of the Turkish Housing Market Since the Early 2000s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 724-740, July.
    13. Huang, Jian & Maassen van den Brink, Henriëtte & Groot, Wim, 2009. "A meta-analysis of the effect of education on social capital," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 454-464, August.
    14. Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 2017. "Centrality of Land in the Capital Accumulation Regime in China [La centralité du foncier dans le régime d’accumulation du capital en Chine]," Post-Print halshs-01556558, HAL.
    15. Andreea Ligia DRUGAU-CONSTANTIN & Andra Karla ANGHEL-SIENERTH, 2022. "Challenges Of Civic Participation At Eu Level During Covid-19 Pandemic: European Citizens' Initiative," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(1), pages 4-10, April.
    16. Anders Lidström, 2010. "Citizens’ Intermunicipal Political Orientations: Evidence from Swedish City-regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(10), pages 2093-2109, September.
    17. Matt Henn & Mark Weinstein & Sarah Forrest, 2005. "Uninterested Youth? Young People's Attitudes towards Party Politics in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(3), pages 556-578, October.
    18. Rickman, Dan S. & Wang, Hongbo, 2016. "Regional Housing Supply Elasticity in China 1999-2013: A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis," MPRA Paper 69157, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Anders Lidström, 2006. "Commuting and Citizen Participation in Swedish City‐Regions," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(4), pages 865-888, December.
    20. Thapa, Manish, 2022. "Civic Engagement Practice at Planning and Monitoring System by Local Government (s) of Nepal," MPRA Paper 111667, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4660-:d:188692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.