IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v8y2025i4p89-d1760343.html

Theoretically Based Dynamic Regression (TDR)—A New and Novel Regression Framework for Modeling Dynamic Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Derrick K. Rollins

    (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50014, USA
    Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50014, USA)

  • Marit Nilsen-Hamilton

    (Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50014, USA)

  • Kendra Kreienbrink

    (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50014, USA)

  • Spencer Wolfe

    (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50014, USA)

  • Dillon Hurd

    (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50014, USA)

  • Jacob Oyler

    (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50014, USA)

Abstract

The theoretical modeling of a dynamic system will have derivatives of the response ( y ) with respect to time ( t ). Two common physical attributes (i.e., parameters) of dynamic systems are dead-time ( θ ) and lag ( τ ). Theoretical dynamic modeling will contain physically interpretable parameters such as τ and θ with physical constraints. In addition, the number of unknown model-based parameters can be considerably smaller than empirically based (i.e., lagged-based) approaches. This work proposes a Theoretically based Dynamic Regression ( TDR ) modeling approach that overcomes critical lagged-based modeling limitations as demonstrated in three large, multiple input, highly dynamic, real data sets. Dynamic Regression ( DR ) is a lagged-based, empirical dynamic modeling approach that appears in the statistics literature. However, like all empirical approaches, the model structures do not contain first-principle interpretable parameters. Additionally, several time lags are typically needed for the output, y , and input, x , to capture significant dynamic behavior. TDR uses a simplistic theoretically based dynamic modeling approach to transform x t into its dynamic counterpart, v t , and then applies the methods and tools of static regression to v t . TDR is demonstrated on the following three modeling problems of freely existing (i.e., not experimentally designed) real data sets: 1. the weight variation in a person ( y ) with four measured nutrient inputs ( x i ); 2. the variation in the tray temperature ( y ) of a distillation column with nine inputs and eight test data sets over a three year period; and 3. eleven extremely large, highly dynamic, subject-specific models of sensor glucose ( y ) with 12 inputs ( x i ).

Suggested Citation

  • Derrick K. Rollins & Marit Nilsen-Hamilton & Kendra Kreienbrink & Spencer Wolfe & Dillon Hurd & Jacob Oyler, 2025. "Theoretically Based Dynamic Regression (TDR)—A New and Novel Regression Framework for Modeling Dynamic Behavior," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:89-:d:1760343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/4/89/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/4/89/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mattias Villani, 2001. "Fractional Bayesian Lag Length Inference in Multivariate Autoregressive Processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 67-86, January.
    2. Dan Stefanoiu & Janetta Culita & Andreea-Cristina Voinea & Vasilica Voinea, 2024. "Nonlinear Identification for Control by Using NARMAX Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-52, July.
    3. Yijian Huang, 2017. "Restoration of Monotonicity Respecting in Dynamic Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 613-622, April.
    4. Li, Meiyu & Gençay, Ramazan, 2017. "Tests for serial correlation of unknown form in dynamic least squares regression with wavelets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 104-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paci, Lucia & Consonni, Guido, 2020. "Structural learning of contemporaneous dependencies in graphical VAR models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Ziyi Li & Yijian Huang & Dattatraya Patil & Martin G. Sanda, 2023. "Covariate adjustment in continuous biomarker assessment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 39-48, March.
    3. Warne, Anders, 2006. "Bayesian inference in cointegrated VAR models: with applications to the demand for euro area M3," Working Paper Series 692, European Central Bank.
    4. Uddin, Gazi Salah & Hernandez, Jose Areola & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Yoon, Seong-Min, 2018. "Time-varying evidence of efficiency, decoupling, and diversification of conventional and Islamic stocks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 167-180.
    5. J. E. Soh & Yijian Huang, 2021. "A varying-coefficient model for gap times between recurrent events," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 437-459, July.
    6. Stelios Bekiros & Jose Arreola Hernandez & Gazi Salah Uddin & Ahmed Taneem Muzaffar, 2020. "On the predictability of crude oil market: A hybrid multiscale wavelet approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 599-614, July.
    7. Roy, Archi & Soni, Anchal & Deb, Soudeep, 2023. "A wavelet-based methodology to compare the impact of pandemic versus Russia–Ukraine conflict on crude oil sector and its interconnectedness with other energy and non-energy markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    8. Ming-Liang Yeh & Hsiao-Ping Chu & Peter Sher & Yi-Chia Chiu, 2010. "R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold: fresh evidence from the panel threshold regression model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 389-401.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:89-:d:1760343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.