IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v8y2025i3p73-d1723882.html

A Mixture Integer GARCH Model with Application to Modeling and Forecasting COVID-19 Counts

Author

Listed:
  • Wooi Chen Khoo

    (Institute of Actuarial Science and Data Analytics, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia)

  • Seng Huat Ong

    (Institute of Actuarial Science and Data Analytics, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
    Institute of Mathematical Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Victor Jian Ming Low

    (Asia School of Business, Kuala Lumpur 50480, Malaysia)

  • Hari M. Srivastava

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3R4, Canada
    Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
    Center for Converging Humanities, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
    Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Azerbaijan University, 71 Jeyhun Hajibeyli Street, AZ1007 Baku, Azerbaijan)

Abstract

This article introduces a flexible time series regression model known as the Mixture of Integer-Valued Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (MINGARCH). Mixture models provide versatile frameworks for capturing heterogeneity in count data, including features such as multiple peaks, seasonality, and intervention effects. The proposed model is applied to regional COVID-19 data from Malaysia. To account for geographical variability, five regions—Selangor, Kuala Lumpur, Penang, Johor, and Sarawak—were selected for analysis, covering a total of 86 weeks of data. Comparative analysis with existing time series regression models demonstrates that MINGARCH outperforms alternative approaches. Further investigation into forecasting reveals that MINGARCH yields superior performance in regions with high population density, and significant influencing factors have been identified. In low-density regions, confirmed cases peaked within three weeks, whereas high-density regions exhibited a monthly seasonal pattern. Forecasting metrics—including MAPE, MAE, and RMSE—are significantly lower for the MINGARCH model compared to other models. These results suggest that MINGARCH is well-suited for forecasting disease spread in urban and densely populated areas, offering valuable insights for policymaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Wooi Chen Khoo & Seng Huat Ong & Victor Jian Ming Low & Hari M. Srivastava, 2025. "A Mixture Integer GARCH Model with Application to Modeling and Forecasting COVID-19 Counts," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:73-:d:1723882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/3/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/3/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arianna Agosto & Paolo Giudici, 2020. "A Poisson Autoregressive Model to Understand COVID-19 Contagion Dynamics," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, July.
    2. R. K. Freeland & B. P. M. McCabe, 2004. "Analysis of low count time series data by poisson autoregression," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 701-722, September.
    3. Wooi Chen Khoo & Seng Huat Ong & Atanu Biswas, 2017. "Modeling time series of counts with a new class of INAR(1) model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 393-416, June.
    4. Konstantinos Fokianos & Roland Fried, 2010. "Interventions in INGARCH processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 210-225, May.
    5. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    6. Wooi Chen Khoo & Seng Huat Ong & Biswas Atanu, 2022. "Coherent Forecasting for a Mixed Integer-Valued Time Series Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Biswas, Atanu & Song, Peter X.-K., 2009. "Discrete-valued ARMA processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(17), pages 1884-1889, September.
    8. René Ferland & Alain Latour & Driss Oraichi, 2006. "Integer‐Valued GARCH Process," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 923-942, November.
    9. Victor Jian Ming Low & Wooi Chen Khoo & Hooi Ling Khoo, 2024. "A generalized Burr mixture autoregressive models for modeling non linear time series," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(19), pages 6832-6851, October.
    10. C. S. Wong & W. S. Chan & P. L. Kam, 2009. "A Student t-mixture autoregressive model with applications to heavy-tailed financial data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 751-760.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanan Elsaied & Roland Fried, 2014. "Robust Fitting Of Inarch Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 517-535, November.
    2. Cui, Yunwei & Wu, Rongning, 2016. "On conditional maximum likelihood estimation for INGARCH(p,q) models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-7.
    3. Paul Doukhan & Konstantinos Fokianos & Joseph Rynkiewicz, 2021. "Mixtures of Nonlinear Poisson Autoregressions," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 107-135, January.
    4. Šárka Hudecová & Marie Hušková & Simos G. Meintanis, 2021. "Goodness–of–Fit Tests for Bivariate Time Series of Counts," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Wagner Barreto‐Souza & Hernando Ombao, 2022. "The negative binomial process: A tractable model with composite likelihood‐based inference," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(2), pages 568-592, June.
    6. M. Kachour & J. F. Yao, 2009. "First‐order rounded integer‐valued autoregressive (RINAR(1)) process," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 417-448, July.
    7. José G. Gómez-García & Jalal Fadili & Christophe Chesneau, 2024. "Learning CHARME models with neural networks," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1337-1374, May.
    8. Vasiliki Christou & Konstantinos Fokianos, 2014. "Quasi-Likelihood Inference For Negative Binomial Time Series Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 55-78, January.
    9. Youngmi Lee & Sangyeol Lee, 2019. "CUSUM test for general nonlinear integer-valued GARCH models: comparison study," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1033-1057, October.
    10. Carallo, Giulia & Casarin, Roberto & Robert, Christian P., 2024. "Generalized Poisson difference autoregressive processes," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1359-1390.
    11. Xinyang Wang & Dehui Wang & Kai Yang, 2021. "Integer-valued time series model order shrinkage and selection via penalized quasi-likelihood approach," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(5), pages 713-750, July.
    12. Konstantinos Fokianos & Roland Fried, 2010. "Interventions in INGARCH processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 210-225, May.
    13. Fokianos, Konstantinos & Rahbek, Anders & Tjøstheim, Dag, 2009. "Poisson Autoregression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(488), pages 1430-1439.
    14. Jian Pei & Yang Lu, 2025. "Forecasting natural disaster frequencies using nonstationary count time series models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1-44, April.
    15. Dag Tjøstheim, 2012. "Some recent theory for autoregressive count time series," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(3), pages 413-438, September.
    16. Moysiadis, Theodoros & Fokianos, Konstantinos, 2014. "On binary and categorical time series models with feedback," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 209-228.
    17. Lanyu Xiong & Fukang Zhu, 2024. "Robust estimation for the one-parameter exponential family integer-valued GARCH(1,1) models based on a modified Tukey’s biweight function," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 495-522, April.
    18. Jiwon Kang & Sangyeol Lee, 2014. "Parameter Change Test for Poisson Autoregressive Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1136-1152, December.
    19. Robert Jung & A. Tremayne, 2011. "Useful models for time series of counts or simply wrong ones?," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(1), pages 59-91, March.
    20. Wooi Chen Khoo & Seng Huat Ong & Biswas Atanu, 2022. "Coherent Forecasting for a Mixed Integer-Valued Time Series Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:73-:d:1723882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.