IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v5y2015i2p384-398d48809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile Technologies and the Incidence of Cyberbullying in Seven European Countries: Findings from Net Children Go Mobile

Author

Listed:
  • Brian O'Neill

    (Centre for Social and Educational Research, Dublin Institute of Technology, Grangegorman, Dublin 7, Ireland)

  • Thuy Dinh

    (Centre for Social and Educational Research, Dublin Institute of Technology, Grangegorman, Dublin 7, Ireland)

Abstract

The harmful effects of bullying and harassment on children have long been of concern to parents, educators, and policy makers. The online world presents a new environment in which vulnerable children can be victimized and a space where perpetrators find new ways to perform acts of harassment. While online bullying is often considered to be an extension of persistent offline behavior, according to EU Kids Online (2011), the most common form of bullying is in person, face-to-face. With the rise in use of mobile Internet technologies, this balance is changing. Increased levels of use and more time spent online accessed through a variety of devices has increased children’s exposure to a range of online risks, including cyberbullying. This article presents the findings of the Net Children Go Mobile project, a cross-national study of children aged 9–16 in seven European countries. The research builds on the work of EU Kids Online and supports the identification of new trends in children’s online experiences of risk and safety. The study finds that while overall levels of bullying have remained relatively static, levels of online bullying have increased, particularly among younger teens. The relationship between cyberbullying and the use of mobile Internet technologies is examined and factors contributing to increased levels of cyberbullying are highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian O'Neill & Thuy Dinh, 2015. "Mobile Technologies and the Incidence of Cyberbullying in Seven European Countries: Findings from Net Children Go Mobile," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:384-398:d:48809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/2/384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/2/384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smyth, Emer & Darmody, Merike, 2021. "Risk and protective factors in adolescent behaviour: The role of family, school and neighbourhood characteristics in (mis)behaviour among young people," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS119, June.
    2. Shan Lu & Lingbo Zhao & Lizu Lai & Congrong Shi & Wanyue Jiang, 2022. "How Do Chinese People View Cyberbullying? A Text Analysis Based on Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Melissa Bohnert & Pablo Gracia, 2021. "Emerging Digital Generations? Impacts of Child Digital Use on Mental and Socioemotional Well-Being across Two Cohorts in Ireland, 2007–2018," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 629-659, April.
    4. Ann Marcus-Quinn & Tríona Hourigan & Selina McCoy, 2019. "The Digital Learning Movement: How Should Irish Schools Respond?," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 50(4), pages 767-783.
    5. Gráinne Murphy & Ciara Corcoran & Mimi Tatlow-Golden & Emma Boyland & Brendan Rooney, 2020. "See, Like, Share, Remember: Adolescents’ Responses to Unhealthy-, Healthy- and Non-Food Advertising in Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Yurdakul, Yeşim & Ayhan, Aynur Bütün, 2021. "Cyber victimization in adolescence: A qualitative study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:384-398:d:48809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.