IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i9p160-d1464248.html

Analysis of Actual Visitation to Amusement Parks and Recreational Facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Ardvin Kester S. Ong

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines
    E.T. Yuchengco School of Business, Mapua University, 1191 Pablo Ocampo Sr. Ext, Makati, Metro Manila 1204, Philippines)

  • Jerald C. Antonio

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Dioseph Andre F. Anduyo

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Shandon Marion L. Oabel

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Jade Francis N. San Miguel

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Emil Renfred A. Rendon

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Christelle Joy M. Rosete

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

Abstract

Recreational facilities are widely regarded as one of the largest sources of and contributors to the tourism of countries worldwide. Given this, this study aimed to examine adults’ general behavioral intentions and actual visitation to amusement and recreational facilities. A total of 1367 adult and young-adult Filipinos voluntarily answered a self-administered survey consisting of measure items drawing on the extended theory of planned behavior framework. Structural equation modeling was employed for the simultaneous analysis of all latent variables and their causal relationships, and the marketing mix greatly affected the hedonic motivation and perceived behavioral control, leading to an indirect effect on behavioral intentions and actual visitation. Subjective norms and attitudes also had a significant direct effect on behavioral intentions and indirect effects on actual visitation. Interestingly, the marketing mix prompted a higher significant effect than behavioral intentions on actual visitation. It was implied that consumers are going to recreational facilities and amusement parks when they can visit an area, access a location, participate in different activities, and have enough resources. Businesses may capitalize on this finding in promoting their amusement parks and recreational facilities. In addition, they may highlight their location and space because they are among the highly significant measured items that the participants noted. The results of this study provides insights into the strategies, individual behavior, and motivation aspects. Implications and managerial insights are provided for the study’s adoption and extension worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Jerald C. Antonio & Dioseph Andre F. Anduyo & Shandon Marion L. Oabel & Jade Francis N. San Miguel & Emil Renfred A. Rendon & Christelle Joy M. Rosete, 2024. "Analysis of Actual Visitation to Amusement Parks and Recreational Facilities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:160-:d:1464248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/9/160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/9/160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Becker, Jan-Michael & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 197-211.
    2. Yuqi Liu & Yao Song & Ryoichi Tamura, 2020. "Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations of Home Motion-Sensing Game Play Behavior in China: An Empirical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Liting Zhang & Weijun Gao & Yongwen Yang & Fanyue Qian, 2020. "Impacts of Investment Cost, Energy Prices and Carbon Tax on Promoting the Combined Cooling, Heating and Power (CCHP) System of an Amusement Park Resort in Shanghai," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganlin Pu & Md. Qamruzzaman & Ahmed Muneeb Mehta & Farah Naz Naqvi & Salma Karim, 2021. "Innovative Finance, Technological Adaptation and SMEs Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Government Support during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Qi Ke & Yunhong Gong & Changping Ke, 2025. "Bridging AI literacy and UTAUT constructs: structural equation modeling of AI adoption among Chinese university students," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Na Xu & Yanpu Zhao & Shun Qin, 2023. "Exploring Business Owners’ Engagement Behavior for Promoting Regional Brands in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on the TPB and ABC Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Carlos Bazan, 2022. "Effect of the University’s Environment and Support System on Subjective Social Norms as Precursor of the Entrepreneurial Intention of Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    6. Sahu, Aditya Kumar & Khan, Mohd Ziyauddin & Gupta, Piyush, 2025. "Instant food on your table: The role of logistics service quality dimensions in the adoption of instant online food delivery services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Alvaro Lleo & Miquel Bastons & Carlos Rey & Fernando Ruiz-Perez, 2021. "Purpose Implementation: Conceptualization and Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Zhikun Ding & Xinyue Huang & Xinrui Wang & Qiaohui Chen & Jiasheng Zhang & Zezhou Wu, 2024. "Investigating the Determinants of Construction Stakeholders’ Intention to Use Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Products Based on the S-O-R Model in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Saini, Munish & Prakash, Gyan & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar & Agarwal, Reeti, 2024. "Why do people purchase plant-based meat products from retail stores? Examining consumer preferences, motivations and drivers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Owais Khan & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2020. "The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 3018-3033, November.
    11. Perera, Shanika Rangani & Sinha, Paresha & Gilbert-Saad, Antoine, 2026. "From entrepreneurial orientation to export performance: A pathway through vicarious learning and absorptive capacity in international SMEs," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    12. Febrianur Ibnu Fitroh Sukono Putra & Awanis Linati Haziroh & Risanda Alirastra Budiantoro & Selvia Puji Lestari & Tiara Daffa Arsanda, 2023. "AMOBA: Innovation barriers of the millennial generation," Asian Management and Business Review, Master of Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13.
    13. Danks, Nicholas P. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Sarstedt, Marko, 2020. "Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 13-24.
    14. Carlos I. Torres & Robert E. Crossler, 2025. "Promoting Security Behaviors in Remote Work Environments: Personal Values Shaping Information Security Policy Compliance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 1183-1195, June.
    15. Jan, Ihsan Ullah & Ji, Seonggoo & Kim, Changju, 2023. "What (de) motivates customers to use AI-powered conversational agents for shopping? The extended behavioral reasoning perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. Rahila Huma Anwar & Sajida Zaki & Natasha Memon & Ramayah Thurasamy, 2021. "Exploring the Interplay of Trait Emotional Intelligence and ESL Teacher Effectiveness: Is Self-Efficacy the Mechanism Linking Them?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    17. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Xin Xie & Shaokang Wu & Ghulam Subhani & Sakina, 2025. "Analyzing how digital orientation contributes to organizational innovation and environmental, social and governance performance through digital inclusion and capabilities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Luther Yuong Qai Chong & Thien Sang Lim, 2022. "Pull and Push Factors of Data Analytics Adoption and Its Mediating Role on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Connor Agyere AJEAKOH & Figen YESILADA & Japheth Nuhu Ahmed, 2025. "Cross-cultural negotiation styles in Shandong province, China: the role of cultural and emotional intelligence," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:160-:d:1464248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.