IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i2p25-d130807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving Quality Education by Understanding Teacher Job Satisfaction Determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Chux Gervase Iwu

    (Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Ikechukwu Onyekwere Ezeuduji

    (Department of Recreation and Tourism, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa)

  • Ita Chimezie Iwu

    (Education Management Solutions, Ibadan 200221, Nigeria)

  • Kenechukwu Ikebuaku

    (School of Economic, Political and Policy Studies, University of Texas, Dallas, TX 75080-3021, USA)

  • Robertson Khan Tengeh

    (Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

Abstract

The issue of quality education in Nigeria has come up in a number of studies. In particular, the teacher has been identified as a major resource in achieving the very important objective of quality basic education. This comes against the backdrop that teachers are perceived to be in a better position to influence the performance of learners. However, how can they positively influence student performance if they themselves are not motivated? A total of 547 teachers in 23 schools (pre-nursery to senior high schools) in the Ibadan South-West Local Government Area in Oyo state, Nigeria participated in the study. SPSS software version 22 was used for data analysis. Descriptive analysis (mean and standard deviation) was done at the first stage and factor analysis at the second stage. The Kaiser’s criterion technique was also applied to determine the factors (components) to be retained for the factor analysis. Only factors with an Eigen value of 1.0 or more were retained for analysis. Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s and Shapiro-Wilk’s tests of normality were also used to test if the generated components (factors) are normally distributed, and the p -values of less than 0.001 for all the components indicated no normal distribution. Overall, the results suggest that teachers’ pay or salary, growth opportunities and responsibilities attached to work are the top three job characteristics variables that contribute to teacher job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Chux Gervase Iwu & Ikechukwu Onyekwere Ezeuduji & Ita Chimezie Iwu & Kenechukwu Ikebuaku & Robertson Khan Tengeh, 2018. "Achieving Quality Education by Understanding Teacher Job Satisfaction Determinants," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:25-:d:130807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/2/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/2/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhumika Gupta & Jeayaram Subramanian, 2014. "Factors affecting motivation among employees in consultancy companies," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01373126, HAL.
    2. Abdulla Al-Mutairi & Kamal Naser & Meshref Al-Enezi, 2017. "Job Satisfaction among Academicians at Business Colleges Operating in Kuwait," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(12), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Skalli, Ali & Theodossiou, Ioannis & Vasileiou, Efi, 2008. "Jobs as Lancaster goods: Facets of job satisfaction and overall job satisfaction," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1906-1920, October.
    4. Bhumika Gupta & Jeayaram Subramanian, 2014. "Factors affecting motivation among employees in consultancy companies," Post-Print hal-01373126, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miloš Hitka & Alžbeta Kucharčíková & Peter Štarchoň & Žaneta Balážová & Michal Lukáč & Zdenko Stacho, 2019. "Knowledge and Human Capital as Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Nikolaos Georgantzis & Efi Vasileiou, 2014. "Are Dangerous Jobs Paid Better? European Evidence," Research in Labor Economics, in: New Analyses of Worker Well-Being, volume 38, pages 163-192, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Grund, Christian, 2011. "Job Preferences as Revealed by Employee Initiated Job Changes," IZA Discussion Papers 6127, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Lina Aldén & Mats Hammarstedt & Hanna Swahnberg, 2020. "Sexual Orientation and Job Satisfaction: Survey-Based Evidence from Sweden," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 69-101, June.
    5. Theodossiou, I. & Zangelidis, A., 2009. "Career prospects and tenure-job satisfaction profiles: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 648-657, August.
    6. Staelens, Lotte & Louche, Céline & D’Haese, Marijke, 2014. "Understanding job satisfaction in a labor intensive sector: Empirical evidence from the Ethiopian cut flower industry," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182815, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Susan J. Linz & Anastasia Semykina, 2012. "What Makes Workers Happy? Anticipated Rewards and Job Satisfaction," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 811-844, October.
    8. Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo & Enrique Fernández-Macías & José-Ignacio Antón & Fernando Esteve, 2011. "Measuring More than Money," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14072.
    9. Konstantinos Pouliakas & Ioannis Theodossiou, 2005. "Socio-Economic Differences in the Perceived Quality of High and Low-Paid Jobs in Europe," Labor and Demography 0506002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Dubnovitskaya, Anastasia & Furmanov, Kirill, 2023. "Job satisfaction in Russia: Wages, working conditions and promotion opportunities," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 72, pages 121-139.
    11. repec:zbw:rwirep:0388 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Feldy Marzena & Bojko Marta, 2020. "Job Expectations and Satisfaction Among Scientists," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 35(1), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Gustavo A. García & Diego René Gonzales-Miranda & Oscar Gallo & Juan Pablo Roman-Calderón, 2018. "Employee Involvement and Job Satisfaction: A Tale of the Millennial Generation," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 16516, Universidad EAFIT.
    14. Lotte Staelens & Sam Desiere & Céline Louche & Marijke D’haese, 2018. "Predicting job satisfaction and workers’ intentions to leave at the bottom of the high value agricultural chain: Evidence from the Ethiopian cut flower industry," Post-Print hal-04352116, HAL.
    15. Anca-Maria Clipa & Cătălin-Ioan Clipa & Magdalena Danileț & Andreia Gabriela Andrei, 2019. "Enhancing Sustainable Employment Relationships: An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Trust in Employer and Subjective Value in Employment Contract Negotiations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Barbara Dluhosch & Daniel Horgos, 2019. "International Competition Intensified: Job Satisfaction Sacrificed?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 479-504, June.
    17. Giovanna Boccuzzo & Martina Gianecchini, 2015. "Measuring Young Graduates’ Job Quality Through a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 453-478, June.
    18. Thanh-Lam Nguyen, 2019. "STEAM-ME: A Novel Model for Successful Kaizen Implementation and Sustainable Performance of SMEs in Vietnam," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-23, February.
    19. Suppa, Nicolai, 2012. "Job Characteristics and Subjective Well-Being in Australia – A Capability Approach Perspective," Ruhr Economic Papers 388, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Nicolai Suppa, 2012. "Job Characteristics and Subjective Well-Being in Australia – A Capability Approach Perspective," Ruhr Economic Papers 0388, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    21. Chang-ming Hsieh, 2012. "Should We Give Up Domain Importance Weighting in QoL Measures?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 99-109, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:25-:d:130807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.