IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i5p259-d1640844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Erased in Translation”: Decoding Settler Colonialism Embedded in Cultural Adaptations to Family Group Conferencing (FGC)

Author

Listed:
  • Hung-Peng Lin

    (School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA)

  • Emiko Tajima

    (School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA)

  • Karina L. Walters

    (Tribal Health Research Office, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA)

  • Marilee Sherry

    (Family Group Leadership, Brantford, ON N3S 7N3, Canada)

Abstract

Māori wisdom revolutionized the child welfare system through the now manualized Family Group Conferencing method. The global trend of adopting and adapting this culturally grounded child welfare practice has been well documented. However, as this service model is adapted and imported to other countries, so is its legacy of settler colonialism. This qualitative case study applies Settler Colonialism Theory to unpack the settler colonialism embedded in the process of adopting an adapted Indigenist family engagement program in Taiwan. Research findings indicate that cultural adaptation reproduces settler colonialism. To implement family engagement within a paternalistic CPS system, program implementers struggled between authoritative decision making and building meaningful state–family partnerships. Although adhering to a model that ostensibly involves family decision making may ease settler anxiety among program implementers, settler colonialism remains the elephant in the room. It frequently undergirds the cultural adaptation process. Liberatory social work practice calls for unpacking settler anxiety, systems of power, and cultural imperialism embedded in program implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung-Peng Lin & Emiko Tajima & Karina L. Walters & Marilee Sherry, 2025. "“Erased in Translation”: Decoding Settler Colonialism Embedded in Cultural Adaptations to Family Group Conferencing (FGC)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:259-:d:1640844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pennell, Joan & Edwards, Myles & Burford, Gale, 2010. "Expedited family group engagement and child permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1012-1019, July.
    2. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Fong, Rowena, 2016. "Outcomes of family centered meetings for families referred to Child Protective Services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 93-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jangmin & Trahan, Mark & Bellamy, Jennifer & Hall, James A., 2019. "Advancing the innovation of family meeting models: The role of teamwork and parent engagement in improving permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 147-155.
    2. Kim, Jangmin & Choi, Mi Jin & Trahan, Mark H. & Bellamy, Jennifer L. & Pierce, Barbara, 2020. "Does parent engagement enhance children’s emotional well-being in family team conference? Not a panacea for families with intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Lambert, Matthew C. & Johnson, Leah E. & Wang, Eugene W., 2017. "The impact of family group decision-making on preventing removals," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 89-92.
    4. Xu, Yanfeng & Ahn, Haksoon & Bright, Charlotte Lyn, 2017. "Family involvement meetings: Engagement, facilitation, and child and family goals," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 37-43.
    5. Wang, Eugene W. & Lambert, Matthew C. & Johnson, Leah E. & Boudreau, Brock & Breidenbach, Rebecca & Baumann, Donald, 2012. "Expediting permanent placement from foster care systems: The role of family group decision-making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 845-850.
    6. Wells, Rebecca & Gifford, Elizabeth J., 2013. "Implementing a case management initiative in high-need schools," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 787-796.
    7. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Fong, Rowena, 2016. "Outcomes of family centered meetings for families referred to Child Protective Services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 93-102.
    8. Kim, Jangmin & Pierce, Barbara J. & Jaggers, Jeremiah W. & Imburgia, Teresa M. & Hall, James A., 2016. "Improving child welfare services with family team meetings: A mixed methods analysis of caseworkers' perceived challenges," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 261-268.
    9. Landsman, Miriam J. & Boel-Studt, Shamra & Malone, Kelli, 2014. "Results from a family finding experiment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-69.
    10. Rauktis, Mary Elizabeth & Bishop-Fitzpatrick, Lauren & Jung, Nahri & Pennell, Joan, 2013. "Family group decision making: Measuring fidelity to practice principles in public child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 287-295.
    11. Snyder, Elizabeth H. & Lawrence, C. Nicole & Dodge, Kenneth A., 2012. "The impact of system of care support in adherence to wraparound principles in Child and Family Teams in child welfare in North Carolina," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 639-647.
    12. Havnen, Karen J.S. & Kojan, Bente Heggem & Askeland, Kristin Gärtner & Nilsen, Sondre Aasen & Storhaug, Anita Skårstad, 2023. "Decision making in child protection emergency cases in Norway," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:259-:d:1640844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.