IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v10y2022i4p40-d948630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Scientific Productivity of Collective Subjects Based on the Time-Weighted PageRank Method with Citation Intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Kuchansky

    (Department of Information Systems and Technology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine
    Department of Cybersecurity and Computer Engineering, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Andrii Biloshchytskyi

    (Administration, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
    Department of Information Technology, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Yurii Andrashko

    (Department of System Analysis and Optimization Theory, Uzhhorod National University, 88000 Uzhhorod, Ukraine)

  • Svitlana Biloshchytska

    (Department of Information Technology, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
    Department of Computer Technology and Data, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Adil Faizullin

    (Department of Quality Assurance, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the scientific productivity of collective subjects. The objective is to build a method for evaluating scientific productivity through calculation, including for new collective subjects with a small citation network—the paper proposes the Time-Weighted PageRank method with citation intensity (TWPR-CI). The Citation Network Dataset (ver. 13) has been analyzed to verify the method. The dataset includes more than 5 million scientific publications and 48 million citations. Four classes of collective subjects (more than 27,000 collective subjects in total) were established. For each class, scientific productivity estimates from 2000 to 2021 were calculated using the PageRank, Time-Weighted PageRank, and TWPR-CI methods. It is shown that the advantage of the TWPR-CI method is the higher sensitivity of the scientific productivity estimates for new collective subjects on average during the first ten years of observation. At the same time, the assessment of scientific productivity for other collective subjects according to this method is stable. However, the small citation network of the new collective subjects prevents the adequate assessment of scientific productivity during the first years of its operation. Therefore, the TWPR-CI method can be used to assess the scientific productivity of collective subjects, in particular the productivity of new ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Kuchansky & Andrii Biloshchytskyi & Yurii Andrashko & Svitlana Biloshchytska & Adil Faizullin, 2022. "The Scientific Productivity of Collective Subjects Based on the Time-Weighted PageRank Method with Citation Intensity," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:40-:d:948630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/4/40/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/4/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fuli Zhang, 2017. "Evaluating journal impact based on weighted citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1155-1169, November.
    2. Massucci, Francesco Alessandro & Docampo, Domingo, 2019. "Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via PageRank," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 185-201.
    3. Ying Ding & Erjia Yan & Arthur Frazho & James Caverlee, 2009. "PageRank for ranking authors in co‐citation networks," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2229-2243, November.
    4. Yanan Wang & An Zeng & Ying Fan & Zengru Di, 2019. "Ranking scientific publications considering the aging characteristics of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(1), pages 155-166, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oleksandr Kuchanskyi & Yurii Andrashko & Andrii Biloshchytskyi & Serik Omirbayev & Aidos Mukhatayev & Svitlana Biloshchytska & Adil Faizullin, 2023. "Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bai, Xiaomei & Zhang, Fuli & Liu, Jiaying & Xia, Feng, 2023. "Quantifying the impact of scientific collaboration and papers via motif-based heterogeneous networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    2. Zhang, Ronda J. & Ye, Fred Y., 2020. "Measuring similarity for clarifying layer difference in multiplex ad hoc duplex information networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).
    3. Yu, Dejian & Sheng, Libo, 2021. "Influence difference main path analysis: Evidence from DNA and blockchain domain citation networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    4. Chen, Ying & Koch, Thorsten & Zakiyeva, Nazgul & Liu, Kailiang & Xu, Zhitong & Chen, Chun-houh & Nakano, Junji & Honda, Keisuke, 2023. "Article’s scientific prestige: Measuring the impact of individual articles in the web of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    5. Zhe Li & Xinyu Huang, 2023. "Identifying Influential Spreaders Using Local Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Parul Khurana & Kiran Sharma, 2022. "Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4483-4498, August.
    7. Maria Cristiana Martini & Elvira Pelle & Francesco Poggi & Andrea Sciandra, 2022. "The role of citation networks to explain academic promotions: an empirical analysis of the Italian national scientific qualification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5633-5659, October.
    8. Wang, Jingjing & Xu, Shuqi & Mariani, Manuel S. & Lü, Linyuan, 2021. "The local structure of citation networks uncovers expert-selected milestone papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    9. José Alberto Molina & David Iñiguez & Gonzalo Ruiz & Alfonso Tarancón, 2021. "Leaders among the leaders in Economics: a network analysis of the Nobel Prize laureates," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 584-589, April.
    10. Shen, Zhao-Li & Su, Meng & Carpentieri, Bruno & Wen, Chun, 2022. "Shifted power-GMRES method accelerated by extrapolation for solving PageRank with multiple damping factors," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    11. Shubham Sharma & Usha Lenka, 2022. "On the shoulders of giants: uncovering key themes of organizational unlearning research in mainstream management journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1599-1695, August.
    12. Neelam Kaushal & Rahul Pratap Singh Kaurav & Brijesh Sivathanu & Neeraj Kaushik, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and HRM: identifying future research Agenda using systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 455-493, June.
    13. Lian, Ying & Liu, Yijun & Dong, Xuefan, 2020. "Strategies for controlling false online information during natural disasters: The case of Typhoon Mangkhut in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Zhang, Fang & Wu, Shengli, 2020. "Predicting future influence of papers, researchers, and venues in a dynamic academic network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    15. Oscar Rodriguez-Prieto & Lourdes Araujo & Juan Martinez-Romo, 2019. "Discovering related scientific literature beyond semantic similarity: a new co-citation approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(1), pages 105-127, July.
    16. Ying Lian & Yueting Zhou & Xueying Lian & Xuefan Dong, 2022. "Cyber violence caused by the disclosure of route information during the COVID-19 pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Indra Budi & Yaniasih Yaniasih, 2023. "Understanding the meanings of citations using sentiment, role, and citation function classifications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 735-759, January.
    18. Sai Bhargavi Vedula & Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, 2024. "Mapping Spiritual Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis and Synthesis of Past Milestones and Future Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 301-328, January.
    19. Xie, Qing & Zhang, Xinyuan & Song, Min, 2021. "A network embedding-based scholar assessment indicator considering four facets: Research topic, author credit allocation, field-normalized journal impact, and published time," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    20. Yanan Wang & An Zeng & Ying Fan & Zengru Di, 2019. "Ranking scientific publications considering the aging characteristics of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(1), pages 155-166, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:40-:d:948630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.