IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v6y2018i12p336-d191677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggregating a Plankton Food Web: Mathematical versus Biological Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Ferenc Jordán

    (Danube Research Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, 1113 Budapest, Hungary
    Evolutionary Systems Research Group, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, 8237 Tihany, Hungary
    Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, 80121 Naples, Italy)

  • Anett Endrédi

    (Danube Research Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, 1113 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Wei-chung Liu

    (Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan)

  • Domenico D’Alelio

    (Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, 80121 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

Species are embedded in a web of intricate trophic interactions. Understanding the functional role of species in food webs is of fundamental interests. This is related to food web position, so positional similarity may provide information about functional overlap. Defining and quantifying similar trophic functioning can be addressed in different ways. We consider two approaches. One is of mathematical nature involving network analysis where unique species can be defined as those whose topological position is very different to others in the same food web. A species is unique if it has very different connection pattern compared to others. The second approach is of biological nature, based on trait-based aggregations. Unique species are not easy to aggregate with others because their traits are not in common with the ones of most others. Our goal here is to illustrate how mathematics can provide an alternative perspective on species aggregation, and how this is related to its biological counterpart. We illustrate these approaches using a toy food web and a real food web and demonstrate the sensitive relationships between those approaches. The trait-based aggregation focusing on the trait values of size ( sv ) can be best predicted by the mathematical aggregation algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferenc Jordán & Anett Endrédi & Wei-chung Liu & Domenico D’Alelio, 2018. "Aggregating a Plankton Food Web: Mathematical versus Biological Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:6:y:2018:i:12:p:336-:d:191677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/6/12/336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/6/12/336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patonai, Katalin & Jordán, Ferenc, 2017. "Aggregation of incomplete food web data may help to suggest sampling strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 352(C), pages 77-89.
    2. Jordán, Ferenc & Liu, Wei-chung & Mike, Ágnes, 2009. "Trophic field overlap: A new approach to quantify keystone species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 2899-2907.
    3. Lai, Shu-mei & Liu, Wei-chung & Jordán, Ferenc, 2015. "A trophic overlap-based measure for species uniqueness in ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 299(C), pages 95-101.
    4. Everett, Martin G. & Borgatti, Steve, 1991. "Role colouring a graph," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 183-188, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patonai, Katalin & Jordán, Ferenc, 2017. "Aggregation of incomplete food web data may help to suggest sampling strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 352(C), pages 77-89.
    2. Pekec, Aleksandar & Roberts, Fred S., 2001. "The role assignment model nearly fits most social networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 275-293, May.
    3. Móréh, Ágnes & Endrédi, Anett & Piross, Sándor Imre & Jordán, Ferenc, 2021. "Topology of additive pairwise effects in food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    4. Torres-Alruiz, Maria Daniela & Rodríguez, Diego J., 2013. "A topo-dynamical perspective to evaluate indirect interactions in trophic webs: New indexes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 363-369.
    5. René Brink & Pieter Ruys, 2008. "Technology driven organizational structure of the firm," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 481-503, October.
    6. Liu, Wei-Chung & Chen, Hsuan-Wien & Tsai, Tsung-Hsi & Hwang, Hsien-Kuei, 2012. "A fish tank model for assembling food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 166-175.
    7. Jordán, Ferenc, 2022. "The network perspective: Vertical connections linking organizational levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    8. Ulrik Brandes & Jürgen Lerner, 2010. "Structural Similarity: Spectral Methods for Relaxed Blockmodeling," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 27(3), pages 279-306, November.
    9. Navia, Andrés Felipe & Cruz-Escalona, Víctor Hugo & Giraldo, Alan & Barausse, Alberto, 2016. "The structure of a marine tropical food web, and its implications for ecosystem-based fisheries management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 23-33.
    10. van den Brink, J.R. & Ruys, P.H.M., 2005. "Technological Change, Wages and Firm Size," Discussion Paper 2005-022, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    11. Lai, Shu-mei & Liu, Wei-chung & Jordán, Ferenc, 2015. "A trophic overlap-based measure for species uniqueness in ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 299(C), pages 95-101.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:6:y:2018:i:12:p:336-:d:191677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.