IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i8p1250-d1379455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Analysis of the Use of Drones in City Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Snežana Tadić

    (Logistics Department, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Mladen Krstić

    (Logistics Department, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
    Department of Economic Sciences, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Miloš Veljović

    (Logistics Department, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Olja Čokorilo

    (Air Transport Department, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Milica Milovanović

    (Air Transport Department, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Drone delivery in city logistics is gaining attention due to road congestion, environmental threats, etc. However, there are risks associated with using drones which can result in hazardous events, such as conflicts in the air, loss of control, and system failures. It is crucial to assess the risks involved in using different types of drones and choose the option with the lowest risk. The existence of different criteria important for this decision imposes the need to apply the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method(s). This paper proposes a new hybrid model that combines the fuzzy Factor Relationship (FARE) method for obtaining the criteria weights and the Axial Distance-based Aggregated Measurement (ADAM) method for obtaining the final ranking of the alternatives. A single-rotor microdrone weighing up to 4.4 lb was chosen as the optimal solution, and after that, the most favorable are also the drones of this size (multi-rotor and fixed-wing microdrones). The establishment of a novel hybrid MCDM model, the identified risks, the set of criteria for evaluating the least risky drones, and the framework for prioritizing the drones are the main novelties and contributions of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Miloš Veljović & Olja Čokorilo & Milica Milovanović, 2024. "Risk Analysis of the Use of Drones in City Logistics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1250-:d:1379455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morteza Yazdani, 2018. "New approach to select materials using MADM tools," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 25-42.
    2. Romualdas GINEVICIUS & Katarzyna SZCZEPANSKAWOSZCZYNA & Marek SZARUCKI & Andrius STASIUKYNAS, 2021. "Assessing Alternatives To The Development Of Administrativeeconomic Units Applying The Fare-M Method," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2021(36), pages 6-24, June.
    3. Yi Li & Min Liu & Dandan Jiang, 2022. "Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Logistics: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Peng Han & Xinyue Yang & Yifei Zhao & Xiangmin Guan & Shengjie Wang, 2022. "Quantitative Ground Risk Assessment for Urban Logistical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Based on Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Wang, Zheng & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Vehicle routing problem with drones," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 350-364.
    6. Sandra Melo & Flavia Silva & Mohammad Abbasi & Parisa Ahani & Joaquim Macedo, 2023. "Public Acceptance of the Use of Drones in City Logistics: A Citizen-Centric Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pei, Zhi & Dai, Xu & Yuan, Yilun & Du, Rui & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "Managing price and fleet size for courier service with shared drones," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Yichen Lu & Chao Yang & Jun Yang, 2022. "A multi-objective humanitarian pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem with drones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 291-353, December.
    3. Cheng, Chun & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2020. "Drone routing with energy function: Formulation and exact algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 364-387.
    4. Yang Xia & Wenjia Zeng & Xinjie Xing & Yuanzhu Zhan & Kim Hua Tan & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "Joint optimisation of drone routing and battery wear for sustainable supply chain development: a mixed-integer programming model based on blockchain-enabled fleet sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 89-127, August.
    5. Vincent F. Yu & Shih-Wei Lin & Panca Jodiawan & Yu-Chi Lai, 2023. "Solving the Flying Sidekick Traveling Salesman Problem by a Simulated Annealing Heuristic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Lixin Shen & Jie Sun & Dong Yang, 2024. "Research on Path Optimization for Collaborative UAVs and Mothership Monitoring of Air Pollution from Port Vessels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-33, June.
    7. Yin, Yunqiang & Li, Dongwei & Wang, Dujuan & Ignatius, Joshua & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Sutong, 2023. "A branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm for the truck-based drone delivery routing problem with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1125-1144.
    8. Tiniç, Gizem Ozbaygin & Karasan, Oya E. & Kara, Bahar Y. & Campbell, James F. & Ozel, Aysu, 2023. "Exact solution approaches for the minimum total cost traveling salesman problem with multiple drones," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 81-123.
    9. Li, Hongqi & Wang, Haotian & Chen, Jun & Bai, Ming, 2020. "Two-echelon vehicle routing problem with time windows and mobile satellites," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 179-201.
    10. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Dukkanci, Okan & Koberstein, Achim & Kara, Bahar Y., 2023. "Drones for relief logistics under uncertainty after an earthquake," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 117-132.
    12. Cui, Haipeng & Li, Keyu & Jia, Shuai & Meng, Qiang, 2024. "Dynamic collaborative truck-drone delivery with en-route synchronization and random requests," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Ane-Mari ANDRONICEANU & Jani KINNUNEN & Irina GEORGESCU, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Motivations To Start New Businesses: A Panel Data Analysis," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 479-491, November.
    14. Chen, Cheng & Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan & Qiu, Rongzu, 2021. "The adoption of self-driving delivery robots in last mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Giuseppe Aiello & Rosalinda Inguanta & Giusj D’Angelo & Mario Venticinque, 2021. "Energy Consumption Model of Aerial Urban Logistic Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Sandra Alvarez Gallo & Julien Maheut, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Logistics Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Li, Hao & Kang, Liujiang & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Zhao, Yue & Amihere, Samuel, 2024. "Fixed Automated stations location and UAVs routing problems in urban road Networks: A tailored Branch-&-price algorithm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Elena Zaitseva & Vitaly Levashenko & Ravil Mukhamediev & Nicolae Brinzei & Andriy Kovalenko & Adilkhan Symagulov, 2023. "Review of Reliability Assessment Methods of Drone Swarm (Fleet) and a New Importance Evaluation Based Method of Drone Swarm Structure Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Ramadhan, Fadillah & Irawan, Chandra Ade & Salhi, Said & Cai, Zhao, 2025. "The truck traveling salesman problem with drone and boat for humanitarian relief distribution in flood disaster: Mathematical model and solution methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(1), pages 270-291.
    20. Li, Jiaojiao & Zhu, Jianghan & Peng, Guansheng & Wang, Jianjiang & Zhen, Lu & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2024. "Branch-Price-and-Cut algorithms for the team orienteering problem with interval-varying profits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 793-807.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1250-:d:1379455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.