IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i8p1862-d1123275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Method for Predicting Rockburst Intensity Based on an Improved Unascertained Measurement and an Improved Game Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Zhe Liu

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Jianhong Chen

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Yakun Zhao

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Shan Yang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

A rockburst is a dynamic disaster that may result in considerable damage to mines and pose a threat to personnel safety. Accurately predicting rockburst intensity is critical for ensuring mine safety and reducing economic losses. First, based on the primary parameters that impact rockburst occurrence, the uniaxial compressive strength ( σ c ), shear–compression ratio ( σ θ / σ c ), compression–tension ratio ( σ c / σ t ), elastic deformation coefficient ( W et ), and integrity coefficient of the rock ( K V ) were selected as the evaluation indicators. Second, an improved game theory weighting method was introduced to address the problem that the combination coefficients calculated using the traditional game theory weighting method may result in negative values. The combination of indicator weights obtained using the analytic hierarchy process, the entropy method, and the coefficient of variation method were also optimized using improved game theory. Third, to address the problem of subjectivity in the traditional unascertained measurement using the confidence identification criterion, the distance discrimination idea of the Minkowski distance was used to optimize the identification criteria of the attributes in an unascertained measurement and was applied to rockburst prediction, and the obtained results were compared with the original confidence identification criterion and the original distance discrimination. The results show that the improved game theory weighting method used in this model makes the weight distribution more reasonable and reliable, which can provide a feasible reference for the weight determination method of rockburst prediction. When the Minkowski distance formula was introduced into the unascertained measurement for distance discrimination, the same rockburst predictions were obtained when the distance parameter (p) was equal to 1, 2, 3, and 4. The improved model was used to predict and analyze 40 groups of rockburst data with an accuracy of 92.5% and could determine the rockburst intensity class intuitively, providing a new way to analyze the rockburst intensity class rationally and quickly.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhe Liu & Jianhong Chen & Yakun Zhao & Shan Yang, 2023. "A Novel Method for Predicting Rockburst Intensity Based on an Improved Unascertained Measurement and an Improved Game Theory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1862-:d:1123275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianhong Chen & Yi Chen & Shan Yang & Xudong Zhong & Xu Han, 2019. "A prediction model on rockburst intensity grade based on variable weight and matter-element extension," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Yakun Zhao & Jianhong Chen & Shan Yang & Zhe Liu, 2022. "Game Theory and an Improved Maximum Entropy-Attribute Measure Interval Model for Predicting Rockburst Intensity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L., 1978. "Modeling unstructured decision problems — the theory of analytical hierarchies," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 147-158.
    4. Diyuan Li & Zida Liu & Danial Jahed Armaghani & Peng Xiao & Jian Zhou, 2022. "Novel Ensemble Tree Solution for Rockburst Prediction Using Deep Forest," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Abdul Muntaqim Naji & Hafeezur Rehman & Muhammad Zaka Emad & Hankyu Yoo, 2018. "Impact of Shear Zone on Rockburst in the Deep Neelum-Jehlum Hydropower Tunnel: A Numerical Modeling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianhong Chen & Zhe Liu & Yakun Zhao & Shan Yang & Zhiyong Zhou, 2024. "Generalized Weighted Mahalanobis Distance Improved VIKOR Model for Rockburst Classification Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guh, Yuh-Yuan, 1997. "Introduction to a new weighting method -- Hierarchy consistency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 215-226, October.
    2. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Li, Dong, 2015. "A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 212-223.
    3. Leanda C. Garvie & David J. Lee & Biljana Kulišić, 2024. "Towards a Bioeconomy: Supplying Forest Residues for the Australian Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Shaofeng Wang & Xin Cai & Jian Zhou & Zhengyang Song & Xiaofeng Li, 2022. "Analytical, Numerical and Big-Data-Based Methods in Deep Rock Mechanics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-5, September.
    6. Roman Vavrek, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1821-1843, November.
    7. Ying Xu & Meiyan Wang & Yicheng Xu & Xin Li & Yun Wu & Fang’ai Chi, 2023. "Evaluation System Creation and Application of “Zero-Pollution Village” Based on Combined FAHP-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Libiao Bai & Kanyin Zheng & Zhiguo Wang & Jiale Liu, 2022. "Service provider portfolio selection for project management using a BP neural network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 41-62, January.
    9. Abdul Muntaqim Naji & Hafeezur Rehman & Muhammad Zaka Emad & Saeed Ahmad & Jung-joo Kim & Hankyu Yoo, 2019. "Static and Dynamic Influence of the Shear Zone on Rockburst Occurrence in the Headrace Tunnel of the Neelum Jhelum Hydropower Project, Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Kang Xu & Jiuping Xu, 2020. "A direct consistency test and improvement method for the analytic hierarchy process," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 359-388, September.
    11. Ergu, Daji & Kou, Gang & Peng, Yi & Shi, Yong, 2011. "A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 246-259, August.
    12. Pranith K. Roy & Krishnendu Shaw, 2023. "A credit scoring model for SMEs using AHP and TOPSIS," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 372-391, January.
    13. Keyou Shi & Yong Liu & Weizhang Liang, 2022. "An Extended ORESTE Approach for Evaluating Rockburst Risk under Uncertain Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Emete Toros & Yavuz Gazibey, 2018. "Priorities of the citizens in city brand development: comparison of two cities (Nicosia and Kyrenia) by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 413-437, December.
    15. Zhiqiang Zhang & Chun Luo & Heng Zhang & Ruikai Gong, 2020. "Rockburst Identification Method Based on Energy Storage Limit of Surrounding Rock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Qing Wang & Yufeng Liu & Xudong Zhang & Huicheng Fu & Sen Lin & Shengyuan Song & Cencen Niu, 2020. "Study on an AHP-Entropy-ANFIS Model for the Prediction of the Unfrozen Water Content of Sodium-Bicarbonate-Type Salinization Frozen Soil," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Benjamin Radcliff, 1986. "Computer-Assisted Approaches To Multiattribute Decision Making," Evaluation Review, , vol. 10(5), pages 578-593, October.
    18. Weijun Liu & Zhixiang Liu & Zida Liu & Shuai Xiong & Shuangxia Zhang, 2023. "Random Forest and Whale Optimization Algorithm to Predict the Invalidation Risk of Backfilling Pipeline," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Yintong Guo & Qiqi Ying & Duocai Wang & Hong Zhang & Famu Huang & Haitao Guo & Lei Hou & Mingnan Xu & Hejuan Liu & Debin Xia, 2022. "Experimental Study on Shear Characteristics of Structural Plane with Different Fluctuation Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Heng Zhang & Liang Chen & Shougen Chen & Jianchun Sun & Jiasong Yang, 2018. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution Law of Microseismic Events and Rockburst Characteristics of the Deeply Buried Tunnel Group," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1862-:d:1123275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.