IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i6p1559-d1104695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Approach to Artificial Intelligent Based Three-Way Decision Making and Analyzing S-Box Image Encryption Using TOPSIS Method

Author

Listed:
  • Saleem Abdullah

    (Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan 23200, Pakistan)

  • Alaa O. Almagrabi

    (Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ihsan Ullah

    (Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan 23200, Pakistan)

Abstract

In fuzzy artificial intelligent decision support systems, three-way intelligent-decision making (TWIDM) has played a very important role in ranking objects under the double hierarchy linguistic variable (DHLV). The 8 × 8 S-boxes are very important for image encryption in secure communication. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to develop a new approach to artificial intelligent three-way decision making via DHLV and apply it to S-box image encryption. Artificial intelligent based three-way decision-making problems with double hierarchy hesitant linguistic terms are developed. The first and second hierarchy hesitant linguistic term sets make up the double hierarchy hesitant linguistic term set, which allows for more flexible expressions of doubt and fuzziness. First, we define the Einstein operational laws, score function, and Einstein aggregation operators; i.e., double hierarchy hesitant linguistic Einstein weighted averaging and weighted geometric operators. First, the unknown weight vector for decision experts is determined by using aggregation operators and entropy measures for DHLV. Then, we find the weight vector for our criteria by using the distance measure. In TWIDM, conditional probability is determined by using the extended TOPSIS method for evaluating the S-boxes for image encryption. The expected losses are then computed by aggregating the loss functions with the help of Einstein-weighted averaging aggregation operators. Finally, we apply the minimum-loss decision rules for the selection of S-box to image encryption. The proposed decision technique has been compared with existing three-way decisions and the result of proposed three-way decision making for analyzing and ranking the S-box is very good and reliable for decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleem Abdullah & Alaa O. Almagrabi & Ihsan Ullah, 2023. "A New Approach to Artificial Intelligent Based Three-Way Decision Making and Analyzing S-Box Image Encryption Using TOPSIS Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1559-:d:1104695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1559/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1559/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Zhu & Zeshui Xu & Meimei Xia, 2012. "Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-13, May.
    2. Shougi S. Abosuliman & Saleem Abdullah & Muhammad Qiyas, 2020. "Three-Way Decisions Making Using Covering Based Fractional Orthotriple Fuzzy Rough Set Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Fei Lin & Yudi Xu & Yang Yang & Hong Ma, 2019. "A Spatial-Temporal Hybrid Model for Short-Term Traffic Prediction," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Chaube, Shshank & Joshi, Dheeraj Kumar & Ujarari, Chandan Singh, 2023. "Hesitant Bifuzzy Set (an introduction): A new approach to assess the reliability of the systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 98-107.
    3. Hui Gao & Linggang Ran & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei & Jiang Wu, 2020. "VIKOR Method for MAGDM Based on Q-Rung Interval-Valued Orthopair Fuzzy Information and Its Application to Supplier Selection of Medical Consumption Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Qasim Noor & Tabasam Rashid & Syed Muhammad Husnine, 2021. "An extended TDM method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment for stock selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Li Li & Hegong Lei & Jun Wang, 2020. "Q -Rung Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-34, September.
    6. Huiping Chen & Guiqiong Xu & Pingle Yang, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Asma Mahmood & Mohsan Raza, 2021. "Observation of a Change in Human Attitude in a Decision Making Process Equipped with an Interference of a Third Party," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Mei Tang & Jie Wang & Jianping Lu & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei & Yu Wei, 2019. "Dual Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Heronian Mean Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Wang Feng, 2019. "Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 70-89, February.
    10. Pavle Milošević & Bratislav Petrović & Ivana Dragović, 2021. "A Novel Approach to Generalized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Based on Interpolative Boolean Algebra," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Kumar, Sourabh & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2023. "Exploring the hyperledger blockchain technology disruption and barriers of blockchain adoption in petroleum supply chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Fanyong Meng & Aiqing Zeng & Jie Tang & Witold Pedrycz, 2023. "Ranking Objects from Individual Linguistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information in View of Optimal Model-Based Consistency and Consensus Iteration Algorithm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 5-44, February.
    13. Xiaonan Ji & Lixia Yu & Jiapei Fu, 2019. "Evaluating Personal Default Risk in P2P Lending Platform: Based on Dual Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy TODIM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Chachra, Aayushi & Kumar, Akshay & Ram, Mangey, 2023. "Intuitionistic fuzzy approach to reliability assessment of multi-state systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 489-503.
    15. Harish Garg & Gagandeep Kaur, 2018. "Algorithm for Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Based on Aggregation Operators with New Distance Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-30, November.
    16. Junling Zhang & Linying Shen & Lijun Liu & Xiaowen Qi & Changyong Liang, 2022. "Tackling Comprehensive Evaluation of Tourism Community Resilience: A Probabilistic Hesitant Linguistic Group Decision Making Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-32, September.
    17. Lu Chen & Ayad Hendalianpour & Mohammad Reza Feylizadeh & Haiyan Xu, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Use of Blockchain Technology in Humanitarian Supply Chain: A Novel Fuzzy Large-Scale Group-DEMATEL," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 359-394, April.
    18. Yan Ni & Hua Zhao & Zeshui Xu & Zeyan Wang, 2022. "Multiple attribute decision-making method based on projection model for dual hesitant fuzzy set," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 263-289, June.
    19. Xiaowen Qi & Junling Zhang & Changyong Liang, 2018. "Multiple Attributes Group Decision-Making Approaches Based on Interval-Valued Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Unbalanced Linguistic Set and Their Applications," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-22, April.
    20. Kumar, Sourabh, 2023. "Evaluation and analysis of India's energy security: A policy perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1559-:d:1104695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.