IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i6p1442-d1099143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Hybrid Model between the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution and Feature Extractions for Bearing Defect Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Yao Lee

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan)

  • Truong-An Le

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Thu Dau Mot University, Thu Dau Mot 75000, Vietnam)

  • Chung-Yao Chang

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan)

Abstract

This paper describes a development that offers new opportunities for detecting faulty bearings. Prioritization is based on the technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) for the most discriminative features in the faulty bearing dataset. The proposed model is divided into three steps: feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. In feature extraction, variational mode decomposition (VMD) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) are used to extract features from the measured signal of the test motors and use the symmetrical uncertainty (SU) value for calculation, reducing the redundancy of data. In terms of feature selection, the TOPSIS method is used instead of the traditional filtering method, which is applied to analysis and decision making, and important features are selected from seven filtering methods. Finally, in order to validate the classification ability of the proposed model, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN) are used as independent classifiers. The effectiveness of the proposed model is evaluated by applying two bearing datasets, namely the current dataset of motor vibration signals and the dataset of bearing motors provided by Case Western Reserve University (CWRU). The results show that the comparison of the proposed model with other models shows the feasibility of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Yao Lee & Truong-An Le & Chung-Yao Chang, 2023. "Application of Hybrid Model between the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution and Feature Extractions for Bearing Defect Classification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1442-:d:1099143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehsan Saghapour & Saeed Kermani & Mohammadreza Sehhati, 2017. "A novel feature ranking method for prediction of cancer stages using proteomics data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Chine, W. & Mellit, A. & Lughi, V. & Malek, A. & Sulligoi, G. & Massi Pavan, A., 2016. "A novel fault diagnosis technique for photovoltaic systems based on artificial neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 501-512.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kara Mostefa Khelil, Chérifa & Amrouche, Badia & Benyoucef, Abou soufiane & Kara, Kamel & Chouder, Aissa, 2020. "New Intelligent Fault Diagnosis (IFD) approach for grid-connected photovoltaic systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Belqasem Aljafari & Siva Rama Krishna Madeti & Priya Ranjan Satpathy & Sudhakar Babu Thanikanti & Bamidele Victor Ayodele, 2022. "Automatic Monitoring System for Online Module-Level Fault Detection in Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Dhimish, Mahmoud & Holmes, Violeta & Dales, Mark, 2017. "Parallel fault detection algorithm for grid-connected photovoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 94-111.
    4. Pavel Kuznetsov & Dmitry Kotelnikov & Leonid Yuferev & Vladimir Panchenko & Vadim Bolshev & Marek Jasiński & Aymen Flah, 2022. "Method for the Automated Inspection of the Surfaces of Photovoltaic Modules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Fonseca Alves, Ricardo Henrique & Deus Júnior, Getúlio Antero de & Marra, Enes Gonçalves & Lemos, Rodrigo Pinto, 2021. "Automatic fault classification in photovoltaic modules using Convolutional Neural Networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 502-516.
    6. Youssef, Ayman & El-Telbany, Mohammed & Zekry, Abdelhalim, 2017. "The role of artificial intelligence in photo-voltaic systems design and control: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 72-79.
    7. Sairam, Seshapalli & Seshadhri, Subathra & Marafioti, Giancarlo & Srinivasan, Seshadhri & Mathisen, Geir & Bekiroglu, Korkut, 2022. "Edge-based Explainable Fault Detection Systems for photovoltaic panels on edge nodes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1425-1440.
    8. Pillai, Dhanup S. & Rajasekar, N., 2018. "Metaheuristic algorithms for PV parameter identification: A comprehensive review with an application to threshold setting for fault detection in PV systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3503-3525.
    9. Mellit, A. & Tina, G.M. & Kalogirou, S.A., 2018. "Fault detection and diagnosis methods for photovoltaic systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-17.
    10. Li, Yuanliang & Ding, Kun & Zhang, Jingwei & Chen, Fudong & Chen, Xiang & Wu, Jiabing, 2019. "A fault diagnosis method for photovoltaic arrays based on fault parameters identification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 52-63.
    11. Yichen Zhou & Xiaohui Yang & Lingyu Tao & Li Yang, 2021. "Transformer Fault Diagnosis Model Based on Improved Gray Wolf Optimizer and Probabilistic Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Youssouf Mouleloued & Kamel Kara & Aissa Chouder & Abdelhadi Aouaichia & Santiago Silvestre, 2025. "Euclidean Distance-Based Tree Algorithm for Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Tingting Pei & Xiaohong Hao, 2019. "A Fault Detection Method for Photovoltaic Systems Based on Voltage and Current Observation and Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Zahra Yahyaoui & Mansour Hajji & Majdi Mansouri & Kais Bouzrara, 2023. "One-Class Machine Learning Classifiers-Based Multivariate Feature Extraction for Grid-Connected PV Systems Monitoring under Irradiance Variations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Nien-Che Yang & Harun Ismail, 2022. "Voting-Based Ensemble Learning Algorithm for Fault Detection in Photovoltaic Systems under Different Weather Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Das, Saborni & Hazra, Abhik & Basu, Mousumi, 2018. "Metaheuristic optimization based fault diagnosis strategy for solar photovoltaic systems under non-uniform irradiance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 452-467.
    17. Van Gompel, Jonas & Spina, Domenico & Develder, Chris, 2023. "Cost-effective fault diagnosis of nearby photovoltaic systems using graph neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    18. Belaout, A. & Krim, F. & Mellit, A. & Talbi, B. & Arabi, A., 2018. "Multiclass adaptive neuro-fuzzy classifier and feature selection techniques for photovoltaic array fault detection and classification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 548-558.
    19. Pillai, Dhanup S. & Rajasekar, N., 2018. "A comprehensive review on protection challenges and fault diagnosis in PV systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 18-40.
    20. Wiktor Olchowik & Marcin Bednarek & Tadeusz Dąbrowski & Adam Rosiński, 2023. "Application of the Energy Efficiency Mathematical Model to Diagnose Photovoltaic Micro-Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1442-:d:1099143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.