IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i11p2551-d1162185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Reliability Assessment Methods of Drone Swarm (Fleet) and a New Importance Evaluation Based Method of Drone Swarm Structure Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Zaitseva

    (Department of Informatics, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Vitaly Levashenko

    (Department of Informatics, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Ravil Mukhamediev

    (Institute of Information and Computational Technologies, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
    Institute of Automation and Information Technology, Satbayev University (KazNRTU), Amaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

  • Nicolae Brinzei

    (Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, F-5400 Nancy, France)

  • Andriy Kovalenko

    (Department of Electronic Computers, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Adilkhan Symagulov

    (Institute of Information and Computational Technologies, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
    Institute of Automation and Information Technology, Satbayev University (KazNRTU), Amaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Drones, or UAVs, are developed very intensively. There are many effective applications of drones for problems of monitoring, searching, detection, communication, delivery, and transportation of cargo in various sectors of the economy. The reliability of drones in the resolution of these problems should play a principal role. Therefore, studies encompassing reliability analysis of drones and swarms (fleets) of drones are important. As shown in this paper, the analysis of drone reliability and its components is considered in studies often. Reliability analysis of drone swarms is investigated less often, despite the fact that many applications cannot be performed by a single drone and require the involvement of several drones. In this paper, a systematic review of the reliability analysis of drone swarms is proposed. Based on this review, a new method for the analysis and quantification of the topological aspects of drone swarms is considered. In particular, this method allows for the computing of swarm availability and importance measures. Importance measures in reliability analysis are used for system maintenance and to indicate the components (drones) whose fault has the most impact on the system failure. Structural and Birnbaum importance measures are introduced for drone swarms’ components. These indices are defined for the following topologies: a homogenous irredundant drone fleet, a homogenous hot stable redundant drone fleet, a heterogeneous irredundant drone fleet, and a heterogeneous hot stable redundant drone fleet.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Zaitseva & Vitaly Levashenko & Ravil Mukhamediev & Nicolae Brinzei & Andriy Kovalenko & Adilkhan Symagulov, 2023. "Review of Reliability Assessment Methods of Drone Swarm (Fleet) and a New Importance Evaluation Based Method of Drone Swarm Structure Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:2551-:d:1162185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/11/2551/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/11/2551/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneeweiss, Winfrid G., 2009. "A short Boolean derivation of mean failure frequency for any (also non-coherent) system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1363-1367.
    2. Zhai, Qingqing & Xing, Liudong & Peng, Rui & Yang, Jun, 2018. "Aggregated combinatorial reliability model for non-repairable parallel phased-mission systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 242-250.
    3. Feng, Qiang & Liu, Meng & Dui, Hongyan & Ren, Yi & Sun, Bo & Yang, Dezhen & Wang, Zili, 2022. "Importance measure-based phased mission reliability and UAV number optimization for swarm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Xu, Bei & Liu, Tao & Bai, Guanghan & Tao, Junyong & Zhang, Yun-an & Fang, Yining, 2022. "A multistate network approach for reliability evaluation of unmanned swarms by considering information exchange capacity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Dui, Hongyan & Zhang, Chi & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Liwei, 2021. "Mission reliability modeling of UAV swarm and its structure optimization based on importance measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    7. Foreman, Veronica L. & Favaró, Francesca M. & Saleh, Joseph H. & Johnson, Christopher W., 2015. "Software in military aviation and drone mishaps: Analysis and recommendations for the investigation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 101-111.
    8. Bai, Guanghan & Li, Yanjun & Fang, Yining & Zhang, Yun-An & Tao, Junyong, 2020. "Network approach for resilience evaluation of a UAV swarm by considering communication limits," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Yi Li & Min Liu & Dandan Jiang, 2022. "Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Logistics: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Favarò, Francesca M. & Saleh, Joseph H., 2018. "Application of temporal logic for safety supervisory control and model-based hazard monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 166-178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Lujie & Yang, Jun, 2023. "A dynamic mission abort policy for the swarm executing missions and its solution method by tailored deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Li, Hongxu & Sun, Qin & Zhong, Yuanfu & Huang, Zhiwen & Zhang, Yingchao, 2023. "A soft resource optimization method for improving the resilience of UAV swarms under continuous attack," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Feng, Qiang & Liu, Meng & Dui, Hongyan & Ren, Yi & Sun, Bo & Yang, Dezhen & Wang, Zili, 2022. "Importance measure-based phased mission reliability and UAV number optimization for swarm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Liu, Tao & Bai, Guanghan & Tao, Junyong & Zhang, Yun-An & Fang, Yining, 2024. "A Multistate Network Approach for Resilience Analysis of UAV Swarm considering Information Exchange Capacity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Xu, Bei & Liu, Tao & Bai, Guanghan & Tao, Junyong & Zhang, Yun-an & Fang, Yining, 2022. "A multistate network approach for reliability evaluation of unmanned swarms by considering information exchange capacity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Sedlacek, Peter & Kvassay, Miroslav & Rabcan, Jan, 2021. "Logical differential calculus for calculation of Birnbaum importance of non-coherent system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Wang, Xiaolin & Xu, Jihui & Zhang, Lei & Wang, Ning, 2023. "Mission success probability optimizing of phased mission system balancing the phase backup and system risk: A novel GERT mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Xu, Bei & Bai, Guanghan & Liu, Tao & Fang, Yining & Zhang, Yun-an & Tao, Junyong, 2023. "An improved swarm model with informed agents to prevent swarm-splitting," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Liu, Tao & Bai, Guanghan & Tao, Junyong & Zhang, Yun-An & Fang, Yining & Xu, Bei, 2022. "Modeling and evaluation method for resilience analysis of multi-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Kong, Linghao & Wang, Lizhi & Cao, Zhongzheng & Wang, Xiaohong, 2024. "Resilience evaluation of UAV swarm considering resource supplementation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Li, Yao & He, Yihai & Ai, Jun & Wang, Chengcheng & Han, Xiao & Liao, Ruoyu & Yang, Xiuzhen, 2022. "Functional health prognosis approach of multi-station manufacturing system considering coupling operational factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Zio, Enrico & Wang, Yanhui & Small, Michael & Li, Man, 2023. "Improving resilience of high-speed train by optimizing repair strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Wang, Yuzhi & Zhang, Yingchao, 2022. "Multi-swarm-based cooperative reconfiguration model for resilient unmanned weapon system-of-systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Matsuoka, Takeshi, 2023. "Reliability analysis of a BWR plant system at startup stage  - analysis by the GO-FLOW methodology with consideration of loop structures and phased mission problem -," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Fangyu Liu & Hongyan Dui & Ziyue Li, 2022. "Reliability analysis for electrical power systems based on importance measures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 317-328, April.
    17. Favarò, Francesca M. & Saleh, Joseph H., 2018. "Application of temporal logic for safety supervisory control and model-based hazard monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 166-178.
    18. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    19. Kawahara, Jun & Sonoda, Koki & Inoue, Takeru & Kasahara, Shoji, 2019. "Efficient construction of binary decision diagrams for network reliability with imperfect vertices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 142-154.
    20. Nicolae Brînzei & Jean-François Aubry, 2018. "Graphs models and algorithms for reliability assessment of coherent and non-coherent systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 201-215, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:2551-:d:1162185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.