IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i3p439-d738280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dual Incentive Value-Based Paradigm for Improving the Business Market Profitability in Blockchain Token Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Chaopeng Guo

    (Software College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China)

  • Pengyi Zhang

    (Software College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China)

  • Bangyao Lin

    (Software College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China)

  • Jie Song

    (Software College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China)

Abstract

Blockchain solves the problem of mutual trust and consensus in the business market of the token economy. In the existing paradigm of blockchain token economy, there are disadvantages of lacking the incentive mechanism, business applications and virtual token value. These shortcomings reduce consumers’ willingness to consume and the profits of the merchants. In this paper, we propose a novel “Dual incentive value-based” paradigm to improve the business market profitability in blockchain token economy. To evaluate our proposed paradigm, we propose a business study case for improving merchants’ environment state. In this case, we set up two economic models and make simulations to validate the profitability. The result shows that merchants with the novel paradigm have 32% more profit compared with those without the paradigm and at most 10% more profitable than those in existing paradigms.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaopeng Guo & Pengyi Zhang & Bangyao Lin & Jie Song, 2022. "A Dual Incentive Value-Based Paradigm for Improving the Business Market Profitability in Blockchain Token Economy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:439-:d:738280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/3/439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/3/439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dale W. Jorgenson, 2018. "Production and Welfare: Progress in Economic Measurement," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(3), pages 867-919, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brynjolfsson, Erik & Collis, Avinash & Diewert, W. Erwin & Eggers, Felix & Fox, Kevin J., 2019. "GDP-B: Accounting for the Value of New and Free Goods in the Digital Economy," OSF Preprints sptfu, Center for Open Science.
    2. Doyle, Matthew & Skuterud, Mikal & Worswick, Christopher, 2023. "The economics of Canadian immigration levels," CLEF Working Paper Series 58, Canadian Labour Economics Forum (CLEF), University of Waterloo.
    3. Josh Martin & Rebecca Riley, 2023. "Productivity measurement - Reassessing the production function from micro to macro," Working Papers 033, The Productivity Institute.
    4. Lejla TERZIĆ, 2020. "Is there a relationship between economic welfare and innovation performance? Evidence from selected European countries," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(4(625), W), pages 159-168, Winter.
    5. Nicholas Crafts & Pieter Woltjer, 2021. "Growth Accounting In Economic History: Findings, Lessons And New Directions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 670-696, July.
    6. Angus Deaton & Paul Schreyer, 2022. "GDP, Wellbeing, and Health: Thoughts on the 2017 Round of the International Comparison Program," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Sevilla, J.P. & Stawasz, Andrew & Burnes, Daria & Poulsen, Peter Bo & Sato, Reiko & Bloom, David E., 2019. "Indirect costs of adult pneumococcal disease and productivity-based rate of return to PCV13 vaccination for older adults and elderly diabetics in Denmark," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    8. Robert J Barro, 2021. "Double Counting of Investment," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2333-2356.
    9. Milan Zafirovski, 2024. "Distributive justice revisited in a comparative setting: the fairness of wages in OECD countries and modalities of society," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-44, January.
    10. Fahd Rehman & Russel J. Cooper, 2023. "Effective GDP: A Cross‐Country Comparison," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 619-652, March.
    11. Bert M. Balk, 2020. "A novel decomposition of aggregate total factor productivity change," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 95-105, February.
    12. Ajayi, V. & Pollitt, M .G., 2022. "Green growth and net zero policy in the UK: some conceptual and measurement issues," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2255, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Yukiko Hashida & Eli P. Fenichel, 2022. "Valuing natural capital when management is dominated by periods of inaction," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 791-811, March.
    14. Charles R. Hulten & Leonard I. Nakamura, 2022. "Is GDP Becoming Obsolete? The “Beyond GDP” Debate," NBER Working Papers 30196, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Paul Schreyer, 2021. "Framing Measurement Beyond GDP," CEPA Working Papers Series WP172021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    16. Nicholas Oulton, 2023. "The effect of changes in the terms of trade on GDP and welfare: A Divisia approach to the System of National Accounts," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 91(4), pages 261-282, July.
    17. Theo Santini & Ricardo Azevedo Araujo, 2021. "Productivity growth and sectoral interactions under Domar aggregation: a study for the Brazilian economy from 2000 to 2014," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, December.
    18. Günseli BERIK, 2020. "Measuring what matters and guiding policy: An evaluation of the Genuine Progress Indicator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 71-94, March.
    19. Nicholas Oulton, 2022. "The Link Between the Standard of Living and Labour Productivity in the UK: A Decomposition," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 42, pages 187-211, Spring.
    20. Kutay Cingiz & Hugo Gonzalez-Hermoso & Wim Heijman & Justus H. H. Wesseler, 2021. "A Cross-Country Measurement of the EU Bioeconomy: An Input–Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-39, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:439-:d:738280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.