IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i21p3938-d951248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protection Strategy Selection Model Based on Genetic Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Xinzhan Li

    (Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computer Networks, Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

  • Yang Zhou

    (Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computer Networks, Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

  • Xin Li

    (Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computer Networks, Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

  • Lijuan Xu

    (Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computer Networks, Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

  • Dawei Zhao

    (Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computer Networks, Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Industrial control systems (ICS) are facing an increasing number of sophisticated and damaging multi-step attacks. The complexity of multi-step attacks makes it difficult for security protection personnel to effectively determine the target attack path. In addition, most of the current protection models responding to multi-step attacks have not deeply studied the protection strategy selection method in the case of limited budget. Aiming at the above problems, we propose a protection strategy selection model based on the Genetic Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm. The model firstly evaluates the risk of ICS through the Bayesian attack graph; next, the target attack path is predicted from multiple angles through the maximum probability attack path and the maximum risk attack path; and finally, the Genetic Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm is used to select the most beneficial protection strategy set for the target attack path under limited budget. Compared with the Genetic Algorithm and Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm, the Genetic Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm proposed in this paper can handle the local optimal problem well. Simulation experiments verify the feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinzhan Li & Yang Zhou & Xin Li & Lijuan Xu & Dawei Zhao, 2022. "Protection Strategy Selection Model Based on Genetic Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:21:p:3938-:d:951248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/21/3938/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/21/3938/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knowles, William & Prince, Daniel & Hutchison, David & Disso, Jules Ferdinand Pagna & Jones, Kevin, 2015. "A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 52-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodofile, Nicholas R. & Radke, Kenneth & Foo, Ernest, 2019. "Extending the cyber-attack landscape for SCADA-based critical infrastructure," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 14-35.
    2. Juntao Chen & Quanyan Zhu & Tamer Başar, 2021. "Dynamic Contract Design for Systemic Cyber Risk Management of Interdependent Enterprise Networks," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 294-325, June.
    3. Mohammed Alghassab, 2021. "Analyzing the Impact of Cybersecurity on Monitoring and Control Systems in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Rajan, Rishabh & Rana, Nripendra P. & Parameswar, Nakul & Dhir, Sanjay & Sushil, & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "Developing a modified total interpretive structural model (M-TISM) for organizational strategic cybersecurity management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Pramod T. C. & Thejas G. S. & S. S. Iyengar & N. R. Sunitha, 2019. "CKMI: Comprehensive Key Management Infrastructure Design for Industrial Automation and Control Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Eric DuBois & Ashley Peper & Laura A. Albert, 2023. "Interdicting Attack Plans with Boundedly Rational Players and Multiple Attackers: An Adversarial Risk Analysis Approach," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 202-219, September.
    7. Vlad Daniel SAVIN & Costel SERBAN, 2019. "Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities And Threats Of Scada Systems In Critical Infrastructures," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 234-237, November.
    8. Jarmakiewicz, Jacek & Parobczak, Krzysztof & Maślanka, Krzysztof, 2017. "Cybersecurity protection for power grid control infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 20-33.
    9. Mustafa, Faizan E & Ahmed, Ijaz & Basit, Abdul & Alvi, Um-E-Habiba & Malik, Saddam Hussain & Mahmood, Atif & Ali, Paghunda Roheela, 2023. "A review on effective alarm management systems for industrial process control: Barriers and opportunities," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    10. CHERIFI, Tarek & HAMAMI, Lamia, 2018. "A practical implementation of unconditional security for the IEC 60780-5-101 SCADA protocol," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 68-84.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:21:p:3938-:d:951248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.