IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i2p60-d1645382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Viability of Electric Bus Adoption for Public Transportation in Thailand: A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sakgasem Ramingwong

    (Supply Chain and Engineering Management Research Unit, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Sate Sampattagul

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Research Unit for Energy Economic & Ecological Management, Multidisciplinary Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Jutamat Jintana

    (Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

Background : Thailand is actively transitioning toward electric vehicle adoption as part of its commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This study investigates the economic feasibility of replacing diesel buses with electric buses in Thailand’s public transportation sector. Methods: The research employs a comprehensive methodological framework combining Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis with Monte Carlo simulation to address uncertainties in long-term financial projections. The study examines four pilot routes operated by a major Thai bus company, incorporating potential carbon credit revenues through Thailand’s Voluntary Emission Reduction program. Results: The analysis reveals substantial cost advantages for electric buses across all examined routes, with TCO savings ranging from 23.07% to 38.25%. Even under conservative scenarios, all routes demonstrate positive economic benefits. The fleet-wide net savings amount to approximately 236 million THB over a 10-year period, with an additional 16.7 million THB potential carbon credit revenue. Sensitivity analysis identifies fuel costs as the most significant factor (45.2%) affecting economic outcomes. Conclusions : The transition to electric buses presents a compelling economic and environmental case for Thai public transportation operators, with significant cost savings and emission reductions. A phased implementation approach beginning with routes offering the highest percentage savings is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakgasem Ramingwong & Sate Sampattagul & Jutamat Jintana, 2025. "Economic Viability of Electric Bus Adoption for Public Transportation in Thailand: A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:60-:d:1645382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/2/60/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/2/60/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dokrak Insan & Wattanapong Rakwichian & Parichart Rachapradit & Prapita Thanarak, 2022. "The Business Analysis of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations to Power Environmentally Friendly Tourism: A Case Study of the Khao Kho Route in Thailand," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 102-111, November.
    2. Jung-Fa Tsai & Sheng-Che Wu & Pajaree Kathinthong & Thu-Hien Tran & Ming-Hua Lin, 2024. "Electric Vehicle Adoption Barriers in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Phasiri Manutworakit & Kasem Choocharukul, 2022. "Factors Influencing Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption in Thailand—Expanding the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology’s Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Dadang Dally & Kurhayadi Kurhayadi & Yeti Rohayati & Soheil Kazemian, 2020. "Personal Carbon Trading, Carbon-Knowledge Management and Their Influence On Environmental Sustainability In Thailand," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 609-616.
    5. Daniel Brinkmann & Veera Bhatiasevi, 2023. "Purchase Intention for Electric Vehicles Among Young Adults in Thailand," Vision, , vol. 27(1), pages 110-118, February.
    6. Abdulgader Alsharif & Chee Wei Tan & Razman Ayop & Ahmed Al Smin & Abdussalam Ali Ahmed & Farag Hamed Kuwil & Mohamed Mohamed Khaleel, 2023. "Impact of Electric Vehicle on Residential Power Distribution Considering Energy Management Strategy and Stochastic Monte Carlo Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Asaad Mohammad & Ramon Zamora & Tek Tjing Lie, 2020. "Integration of Electric Vehicles in the Distribution Network: A Review of PV Based Electric Vehicle Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Teresa Nogueira & José Magano & Ezequiel Sousa & Gustavo R. Alves, 2021. "The Impacts of Battery Electric Vehicles on the Power Grid: A Monte Carlo Method Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steinbach, Sarah A. & Blaschke, Maximilian J., 2024. "Enabling electric mobility: Can photovoltaic and home battery systems significantly reduce grid reinforcement costs?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    2. Nathanael Johnson & Torsten Reimer, 2023. "The Adoption and Use of Smart Assistants in Residential Homes: The Matching Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Lucio Ciabattoni & Stefano Cardarelli & Marialaura Di Somma & Giorgio Graditi & Gabriele Comodi, 2021. "A Novel Open-Source Simulator Of Electric Vehicles in a Demand-Side Management Scenario," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Fachrizal, Reza & Shepero, Mahmoud & Åberg, Magnus & Munkhammar, Joakim, 2022. "Optimal PV-EV sizing at solar powered workplace charging stations with smart charging schemes considering self-consumption and self-sufficiency balance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Xuejun Zheng & Shaorong Wang & Zia Ullah & Mengmeng Xiao & Chang Ye & Zhangping Lei, 2021. "A Novel Optimization Method for a Multi-Year Planning Scheme of an Active Distribution Network in a Large Planning Zone," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Hao, Daning & Qi, Lingfei & Tairab, Alaeldin M. & Ahmed, Ammar & Azam, Ali & Luo, Dabing & Pan, Yajia & Zhang, Zutao & Yan, Jinyue, 2022. "Solar energy harvesting technologies for PV self-powered applications: A comprehensive review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 678-697.
    7. Tommy Lundgren & Mattias Vesterberg, 2024. "Efficiency in electricity distribution in Sweden and the effects of small-scale generation, electric vehicles and dynamic tariffs," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 121-137, October.
    8. Pannee Suanpang & Pitchaya Jamjuntr, 2024. "Optimal Electric Vehicle Battery Management Using Q-learning for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-50, August.
    9. María García de Blanes Sebastián & José Ramón Sarmiento Guede & Alberto Azuara Grande & David Juárez-Varón, 2024. "Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1347-1368, August.
    10. Theron Smith & Joseph Garcia & Gregory Washington, 2022. "Novel PEV Charging Approaches for Extending Transformer Life," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Pampa Sinha & Kaushik Paul & Sanchari Deb & Sulabh Sachan, 2023. "Comprehensive Review Based on the Impact of Integrating Electric Vehicle and Renewable Energy Sources to the Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-39, March.
    12. Correia Sinézio Martins, Edlaine & Lépine, Julien & Corbett, Jacqueline, 2024. "Assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives on electric vehicle adoption in Europe: Multi-period difference-in-difference approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Antonio Venancio M. L. Filho & Andrea S. M. Vasconcelos & Washington de A. S. Junior & Nicolau K. L. Dantas & Ayrlw Maynyson C. Arcanjo & Amanda C. M. Souza & Amanda L. Fernandes & Kaihang Zhang & Kun, 2023. "Impact Analysis and Energy Quality of Photovoltaic, Electric Vehicle and BESS Lead-Carbon Recharge Station in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Wojciech Cieslik & Filip Szwajca & Wojciech Golimowski & Andrew Berger, 2021. "Experimental Analysis of Residential Photovoltaic (PV) and Electric Vehicle (EV) Systems in Terms of Annual Energy Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Aditya Mahatidanar Hidayat & Kasem Choocharukul, 2023. "Passengers’ Intentions to Use Public Transport during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Bangkok and Jakarta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Zhang, Yijie & Ma, Tao & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Grid-connected photovoltaic battery systems: A comprehensive review and perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    17. Shubham Mishra & Shrey Verma & Subhankar Chowdhury & Ambar Gaur & Subhashree Mohapatra & Gaurav Dwivedi & Puneet Verma, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review on Developments in Electric Vehicle Charging Station Infrastructure and Present Scenario of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Wen, Le & Sheng, Mingyue Selena & Sharp, Basil & Meng, Tongyu & Du, Bo & Yi, Ming & Suomalainen, Kiti & Gkritza, Konstantina, 2023. "Exploration of the nexus between solar potential and electric vehicle uptake: A case study of Auckland, New Zealand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Henrique Ferreira & Susana Silva & Tiago Andrade & Erika Laranjeira & Isabel Soares, 2023. "Assessment of Selected Determinants Affecting the Acceptance of the Development of Electromobility by the Private and Business Sectors—A Case Study in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Guindi, Marina & Kamel, Rashad M., 2024. "Optimal location and sizing of renewable distributed generations and electric vehicle charging stations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:60-:d:1645382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.