IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i1p39-d1611454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Aspect Probability Model of Expected Profit Subject to Uncertainty for Managerial Decision-Making in Local Transport Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Holubčík

    (Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Žilina, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Lukáš Falát

    (Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Žilina, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Jakub Soviar

    (Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Žilina, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Juraj Dubovec

    (Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Žilina, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Background : Governments face critical decisions regarding road remediation projects, requiring careful economic evaluation, especially in countries like Slovakia where road infrastructure is crucial for attracting foreign investment. These decisions are complex, involving short-term and long-term costs and revenues, along with inherent uncertainty about future outcomes. Traditional economic assessments often fail to capture the full scope of these factors, potentially leading to suboptimal choices. Methods : This study proposes four probability-based models: the Short-term Model (SM), Long-term-Short-term Model (LSM), Social Long-term-Short-term Model (SLSM), and Long-term-Short-term Model with a Time Aspect (TLSM). These models incorporate probabilistic functions to calculate expected costs and profits, considering various factors such as reparation costs, financial compensations, social costs, and time-related costs, as well as long-term benefits like increased investment and lives saved. Results : The proposed models were partially validated through an ex post analysis of a past road remediation project on road 1/18 (E50) under the Strecno castle cliff in Slovakia. The analysis demonstrated the models’ utility for multi-criteria decision-making in transportation problems, highlighting their ability to capture the complex interplay of economic and societal factors. Conclusions : The models enable governments to maximize societal benefit while mitigating potential risks, contributing to a more sustainable and efficient transportation sector. Future research could focus on refining the models and adapting them to other sectors beyond transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Holubčík & Lukáš Falát & Jakub Soviar & Juraj Dubovec, 2025. "Multi-Aspect Probability Model of Expected Profit Subject to Uncertainty for Managerial Decision-Making in Local Transport Problems," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:39-:d:1611454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/1/39/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/1/39/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiahai Yuan & Yurong Zeng & Xiaoxuan Guo & Yu Ai & Minpeng Xiong, 2018. "Electric Power Investment Risk Assessment for Belt and Road Initiative Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Gabriel Koman & Dominika Toman & Radoslav Jankal & Silvia Krúpová, 2024. "Public Transport Infrastructure with Electromobility Elements at the Smart City Level to Support Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Torra, Vicenç, 2023. "The transport problem for non-additive measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 679-689.
    4. Xiang Ziquan & Yang Jiaqi & Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Xiang Zuquan & Niansheng Tang, 2021. "Solving the Multiobjective Transportation Decision-Making Problem Based on Improved S-Type Membership Function," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, September.
    5. Michal Varmus & Pavol Boško & Roman Adámik & Ivan Greguška, 2024. "Sports management in the context of sustainability," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 12(1), pages 240-252, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kodad Rajaa & Jingfeng Yuan & Lei Zhang & Junwei Ma & Lei Zhang, 2021. "External Factors Affecting Investment in Overseas Electric Power Projects," Springer Books, in: Gui Ye & Hongping Yuan & Jian Zuo (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, pages 1455-1472, Springer.
    2. Qian Luo & Guohua Fang & Jian Ye & Min Yan & Chengxuan Lu, 2020. "Country Evaluation for China’s Hydropower Investment in the Belt and Road Initiative Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    4. Peng, Benhong & Zhao, Yinyin & Elahi, Ehsan & Wan, Anxia, 2022. "Pathway and key factor identification of third-party market cooperation of China's overseas energy investment projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Wei Yang & Feihuang Xue & Jinfeng Shi & Yanmin Shao & Di Wang, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Trade Dependence Relationship of Asian Countries with China: Implications for China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Yana Duan & Yang Sun & Yu Zhang & Xiaoqi Fan & Qinghuan Dong & Sen Guo, 2021. "Risk Evaluation of Electric Power Grid Investment in China Employing a Hybrid Novel MCDM Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Ziquan Xiang & Jiaqi Yang & Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Wenjie Ge, 2022. "Research on Dynamic Cooperative Replenishment Optimization of Shipbuilding Enterprise Inventory Control under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Bowen Tang & Yuanzhang Sun & Nan Zhou & Bo Shen, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Power Retailers and Industrial Parks in China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Qiyong Chen & Shiyu Chen & Changfeng Shi & Qinghua Pang & Ang Li, 2021. "Evaluation of agricultural investment environment in countries around the Black Sea under the background of The Belt and Road," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(4), pages 464-483, November.
    10. Zhang, Mingming & Pang, Zhichao & Liu, Liyun & Yang, Zikun & Zhou, Dequn, 2024. "Risk assessment of China's overseas energy investments considering the response ability to major risk events: A case study of COVID-19," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    11. Jelena M. Andrić & Jiayuan Wang & Ruoyu Zhong, 2019. "Identifying the Critical Risks in Railway Projects Based on Fuzzy and Sensitivity Analysis: A Case Study of Belt and Road Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Huang, Jianbai & Liu, Jia & Zhang, Hongwei & Guo, Yaoqi, 2020. "Sustainable risk analysis of China's overseas investment in iron ore," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Zhiheng Wu & Guisheng Hou & Baogui Xin, 2020. "Has the Belt and Road Initiative Brought New Opportunities to Countries Along the Routes to Participate in Global Value Chains?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    14. Yu, Donghui & Gu, Baihe & Zhu, Kaiwei & Yang, Jiawen & Sheng, Yuhui, 2024. "Risk analysis of China's renewable energy cooperation with belt and road economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:39-:d:1611454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.