IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i4p68-d927295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Second-Tier Container Port Facilities on Drayage Operation

Author

Listed:
  • Samaneh Shiri

    (Operations Research, United Postal Service, Timonium MD 21093, USA)

  • Nathan Huynh

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Daniel Smith

    (The Tioga Group, Inc., Moraga, CA 94556, USA)

  • Frank Harder

    (The Tioga Group, Inc., Moraga, CA 94556, USA)

Abstract

Background : An increasing number of container and chassis staging, “dray-off”, drop yard, and depot facilities are being established outside of North American marine container terminals. The increased use of these “second-tier” facilities implies that there must be some capacity, delivery time, service, or reliability benefit that offset the additional cost and complexity. Methods : This paper builds on the previously developed integrated drayage scheduling model to determine the impact of second-tier port facilities on drayage operation. It modifies the previously developed model by incorporating the following features: (1) trucks do not have to wait at customers’ locations during the import unloading and export loading operations; (2) drayage operations can include a drop yard (i.e., second-tier facility) for picking up or/and dropping off loaded containers outside the marine container terminal; and (3) a customer is allowed to request any of the following jobs: pick up an empty container, pick up a loaded container, drop off an empty container, and drop off a loaded container. Results : The results indicated that by moving the location of import pickup and export delivery from inside the marine container terminal to a location outside the terminal, the efficiency of drayage operation could increase. Additionally, when import pickup and export delivery take place inside the marine container terminal, the most efficient location for the chassis yard and empty container depot is inside the terminal. However, when the location of import pickup and/or export delivery are outside the terminal, the most efficient location for the chassis yard and empty container depot is also outside the terminal. Conclusions : The modeling results suggest that in addition to adding reserved capacity for marine terminals or as buffers to reconcile the preferred delivery times of importers, the second-tier facilities could also yield operational savings. However, the potential drayage efficiencies depend heavily on shorter queuing and turn time at these less-complex facilities compared to marine container terminals. Lastly, the modeling results suggest that the observed evolution of North American marine container terminals from self-contained entities into multi-tier systems is likely to continue to add additional capacities to accommodate container trade growth. This finding has important implications for regions and communities concerned over the impact of growing container ports.

Suggested Citation

  • Samaneh Shiri & Nathan Huynh & Daniel Smith & Frank Harder, 2022. "Impact of Second-Tier Container Port Facilities on Drayage Operation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:4:p:68-:d:927295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/4/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/4/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Namboothiri, Rajeev & Erera, Alan L., 2008. "Planning local container drayage operations given a port access appointment system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 185-202, March.
    2. Wang, Xiubin & Regan, Amelia C., 2002. "Local truckload pickup and delivery with hard time window constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 97-112, February.
    3. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Current, John, 2007. "A Lagrangian relaxation-based heuristic for the vehicle routing with full container load," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 87-105, January.
    4. Zhang, Ruiyou & Yun, Won Young & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2009. "A reactive tabu search algorithm for the multi-depot container truck transportation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 904-914, November.
    5. Funke, Julia & Kopfer, Herbert, 2016. "A model for a multi-size inland container transportation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 70-85.
    6. Lei, Ting L. & Church, Richard L., 2011. "Locating short-term empty-container storage facilities to support port operations: A user optimal approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 738-754, September.
    7. Zhang, Guangming & Smilowitz, Karen & Erera, Alan, 2011. "Dynamic planning for urban drayage operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 764-777, September.
    8. Shiri, Samaneh & Huynh, Nathan, 2016. "Optimization of drayage operations with time-window constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 7-20.
    9. Yetkin Ileri & Mokhtar Bazaraa & Ted Gifford & George Nemhauser & Joel Sokol & Erick Wikum, 2006. "An optimization approach for planning daily drayage operations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(2), pages 141-156, June.
    10. Nossack, Jenny & Pesch, Erwin, 2013. "A truck scheduling problem arising in intermodal container transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 666-680.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Escudero-Santana, Alejandro & Muñuzuri, Jesús & Cortés, Pablo & Onieva, Luis, 2021. "The one container drayage problem with soft time windows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Bustos-Coral, Daniel & Costa, Alysson M., 2022. "Drayage routing with heterogeneous fleet, compatibility constraints, and truck load configurations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Song, Yujian & Zhang, Jiantong & Liang, Zhe & Ye, Chunming, 2017. "An exact algorithm for the container drayage problem under a separation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 231-254.
    4. Zhang, Ruiyou & Lu, Jye-Chyi & Wang, Dingwei, 2014. "Container drayage problem with flexible orders and its near real-time solution strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 235-251.
    5. Fan, Tijun & Pan, Qianlan & Pan, Fei & Zhou, Wei & Chen, Jingyi, 2020. "Intelligent logistics integration of internal and external transportation with separation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Benantar, A. & Abourraja, M.N. & Boukachour, J. & Boudebous, D. & Duvallet, C., 2020. "On the integration of container availability constraints into daily drayage operations arising in France: Modelling and optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Xue, Ning & Bai, Ruibin & Qu, Rong & Aickelin, Uwe, 2021. "A hybrid pricing and cutting approach for the multi-shift full truckload vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 500-514.
    8. Shiri, Samaneh & Huynh, Nathan, 2016. "Optimization of drayage operations with time-window constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 7-20.
    9. Yujian Song & Yuting Zhang & Wanli Wang & Ming Xue, 2023. "A Branch and Price Algorithm for the Drop-and-Pickup Container Drayage Problem with Empty Container Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Chen, Rui & Chen, Shukai & Cui, Haipeng & Meng, Qiang, 2021. "The container drayage problem for heterogeneous trucks with multiple loads: A revisit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Nossack, Jenny & Pesch, Erwin, 2013. "A truck scheduling problem arising in intermodal container transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 666-680.
    12. Chen, Rui & Meng, Qiang & Jia, Peng, 2022. "Container port drayage operations and management: Past and future," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Xue, Zhaojie & Zhang, Canrong & Lin, Wei-Hua & Miao, Lixin & Yang, Peng, 2014. "A tabu search heuristic for the local container drayage problem under a new operation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 136-150.
    14. Chen, Rui & Jia, Shuai & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Dynamic container drayage booking and routing decision support approach for E-commerce platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Zhang, Ruiyou & Zhao, Haishu & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2018. "Range-based truck-state transition modeling method for foldable container drayage services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 225-239.
    16. Moghaddam, Mahboobeh & Pearce, Robin H. & Mokhtar, Hamid & Prato, Carlo G., 2020. "A generalised model for container drayage operations with heterogeneous fleet, multi-container sizes and two modes of operation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    17. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    18. Hajem A. Daham & Xinan Yang & Michaela K. Warnes, 2017. "An efficient mixed integer programming model for pairing containers in inland transportation based on the assignment of orders," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(6), pages 678-694, June.
    19. Jennifer A. Pazour & Lucas C. Neubert, 2013. "Routing and Scheduling of Cross-Town Drayage Operations at J.B. Hunt Transport," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 117-129, April.
    20. Xinan Yang & Hajem A. Daham, 2020. "A column generation-based decomposition and aggregation approach for combining orders in inland transportation of containers," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(1), pages 261-296, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:4:p:68-:d:927295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.