IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v9y2020i2p11-d344488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Impact of Government Regulation on Technological Transitions; a Historical Perspective on Innovation in the Dutch Network-Based Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Stout

    (Erasmus School of Law; Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Martin de Jong

    (Erasmus School of Law; Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Institute for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Government interventions can affect processes of technological transition through the enactment of legal and other policy instruments. In this contribution, we concentrated on legal interventions only and examined what they were, the relation between the public and private players that they affected, and the nature of the incentive they provided. We did this for four historical cases in the world of utility industries in the Netherlands in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The summarizing results for each case appeared in overview tables which eventually showed whether most of the administered stimuli were negative, neutral, or positive for the action alternatives of the innovating players, and thus the further development of the newly emerging technology. It is hard to escape the conclusion that the common argument and rhetoric that governments normally aim to propel industrial progress by opening a variety of options for innovating private players rings hollow when analyzed more systematically. A higher number of the incentives we found across the four cases were negative rather than positive, while some cases had only negative incentives and none had more positive than negative incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Stout & Martin de Jong, 2020. "Exploring the Impact of Government Regulation on Technological Transitions; a Historical Perspective on Innovation in the Dutch Network-Based Industries," Laws, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:11-:d:344488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/2/11/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/2/11/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst ten Heuvelhof & Martin de Jong & Mirjam Kars & Helen Stout, 2009. "Strategic Behaviour in Network Industries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12944.
    2. Mark Fenwick & Erik P. M. Vermeulen & Marcelo Corrales, 2018. "Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology," Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation, in: Marcelo Corrales & Mark Fenwick & Nikolaus Forgó (ed.), Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, pages 81-103, Springer.
    3. Rolf W. Kunneke & John Groenewegen & Jean-François Auger (ed.), 2009. "The Governance of Network Industries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12622.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes M. Bauer & Michael Latzer, 2016. "The economics of the Internet: an overview," Chapters, in: Johannes M. Bauer & Michael Latzer (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Claude Ménard, 2013. "Is Public-Private Partnership Obsolete? Assessing the Obstacles and Shortcomings of PPP," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00653090, HAL.
    3. Petrella, Andrea & Sapio, Alessandro, 2012. "Assessing the impact of forward trading, retail liberalization, and white certificates on the Italian wholesale electricity prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 307-317.
    4. Matthias Finger & Dominique Finon, 2011. "From ‘Service Public’ to Universal Service: The Case of the European Union," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Emmanuelle Mathieu & Koen Verhoest & Joery Matthys, 2017. "Measuring multi‐level regulatory governance: Organizational proliferation, coordination, and concentration of influence," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 252-268, September.
    6. Ernst ten Heuvelhof & Martijn Leijten, 2013. "New Public Management and the new features of strategic behaviour," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 6, pages 111-130, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00653090 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Sowa, Konrad & Przegalinska, Aleksandra & Ciechanowski, Leon, 2021. "Cobots in knowledge work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 135-142.
    9. Stefan Philipsen & Evert F. Stamhuis & Martin de Jong, 2021. "Legal enclaves as a test environment for innovative products: Toward legally resilient experimentation policies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1128-1143, October.
    10. Andrea Petrella & Sandro Sapio, 2010. "No PUN intended: A time series analysis of the Italian day-ahead electricity prices," RSCAS Working Papers 2010/03, European University Institute.
    11. Joop Koppenjan & Christopher Koliba, 2013. "Transformations Towards New Public Governance: Can the New Paradigm Handle Complexity?," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 1-8, August.
    12. Mu, Rui & Jong, Martin de & Koppenjan, Joop, 2011. "The rise and fall of Public–Private Partnerships in China: a path-dependent approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 794-806.
    13. Ronan Bolton & Timothy J Foxon, 2013. "Urban Infrastructure Dynamics: Market Regulation and the Shaping of District Energy in UK Cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(9), pages 2194-2211, September.
    14. Tim Busscher & Christian Zuidema & Taede Tillema & Jos Arts, 2014. "Bridging Gaps: Governing Conflicts between Transport and Environmental Policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 666-681, March.
    15. Aleksandra Kuzior & Mariya Sira & Paulina Brożek, 2023. "Use of Artificial Intelligence in Terms of Open Innovation Process and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:11-:d:344488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.