IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i5p84-d233862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Conservation in the Gulf of Mexico Region: A Comprehensive Review of Plans, Priorities, and Efforts

Author

Listed:
  • Sathishkumar Samiappan

    (Geosystems Research Institute, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Andrew Shamaskin

    (Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Jiangdong Liu

    (Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Jennifer Roberts

    (Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Anna Linhoss

    (Geosystems Research Institute, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
    Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Kristine Evans

    (Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

Abstract

An unprecedented land conservation effort is presently underway in the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Region (GCR) due to an influx of funds from settlements related to the 2012 RESTORE Act. A complete understanding of the priorities of the states in the GCR is critical to ensure that land conservation planning efforts are implemented effectively and efficiently. The paper reviews past, current, and future land conservation priorities in the GCR to inform strategic planning efforts. This review catalogs an extensive list of projects and plans proposed and implemented at federal, state, county, and city levels with direct ties to land conservation during the past 20 years. Comprehensive restoration goals proposed by the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration (Restore) Council were used as a framework for grouping priorities within conservation plans and projects. Plans were first compiled via internet searches and expert sources, then a series of eight stakeholder charrettes were held across the GCR states to validate the catalog and add missing projects and plans. A geospatial web tool was developed using the Restore Council goal framework to allow for the identification and exploration of plans in the GCR.

Suggested Citation

  • Sathishkumar Samiappan & Andrew Shamaskin & Jiangdong Liu & Jennifer Roberts & Anna Linhoss & Kristine Evans, 2019. "Land Conservation in the Gulf of Mexico Region: A Comprehensive Review of Plans, Priorities, and Efforts," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:5:p:84-:d:233862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/5/84/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/5/84/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abid Mehmood, 2016. "Of resilient places: planning for urban resilience," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 407-419, February.
    2. Benjamin Cooke & William T. Langford & Ascelin Gordon & Sarah Bekessy, 2012. "Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 469-485, July.
    3. Sristi Kamal & Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak & Gregory Brown, 2015. "Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 576-597, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Shamaskin & Sathishkumar Samiappan & Jiangdong Liu & Jennifer Roberts & Anna Linhoss & Kristine Evans, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Ecological and Socioeconomic Geodatabase for the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Region of the United States," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cortés-Capano, Gonzalo & Hanley, Nick & Sheremet, Oleg & Hausmann, Anna & Toivonen, Tuuli & Garibotto-Carton, Gustavo & Soutullo, Alvaro & Di Minin, Enrico, 2021. "Assessing landowners’ preferences to inform voluntary private land conservation: The role of non-monetary incentives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Hayley S. Clements & Matthew J. Selinske & Carla L. Archibald & Benjamin Cooke & James A. Fitzsimons & Julie E. Groce & Nooshin Torabi & Mathew J. Hardy, 2018. "Fairness and Transparency Are Required for the Inclusion of Privately Protected Areas in Publicly Accessible Conservation Databases," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Matzek, Virginia & Wilson, Kerrie A. & Kragt, Marit, 2019. "Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 79-86.
    4. Bircol, Guilherme Augusto Carminato & Souza, Marcelo Pereira de & Fontes, Aurélio Teodoro & Chiarello, Adriano Garcia & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Planning by the rules: A fair chance for the environment in a land-use conflict area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-112.
    5. Laura Gómez Aíza & Karina Ruíz Bedolla & Antonio M. Low-Pfeng & Laura M. L. Vallejos Escalona & Paola Massyel García-Meneses, 2021. "Perceptions and sustainable actions under land degradation and climate change: the case of a remnant wetland in Mexico City," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4984-5003, April.
    6. Fabio Mazzola & Iolanda Cascio & Rosalia Epifanio & Giuseppe Giacomo, 2018. "Territorial capital and growth over the Great Recession: a local analysis for Italy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 411-441, March.
    7. Baranovskis, Ģirts & Nikodemus, Oļģerts & Elferts, Didzis & Brūmelis, Guntis & Līviņa, Agita & Mežgaile, Anda, 2025. "Biodiversity conservation in private forests: Preferences of Latvian forest owners in the context of involuntary conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Zafikha Aida Bidin & Asmah Alia Mohamad Bohari & Norfashiha Hashim & Khalid Zanudin, 2024. "Preliminary Findings on Collaborative Approach Elements in Influencing Green Procurement Implementation for Construction Projects," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(12), pages 4146-4158, December.
    9. Dongjun Kim & Jinsung Yun & Kijung Kim & Seungil Lee, 2021. "A Comparative Study of the Robustness and Resilience of Retail Areas in Seoul, Korea before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak, Using Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Carolina Andion & Graziela Dias Alperstedt & Julia Furlanetto Graeff & Luciana Ronconi, 2022. "Social innovation ecosystems and sustainability in cities: a study in Florianópolis, Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1259-1281, January.
    11. Delaroche, Martin & Le Tourneau, François-Michel & Daugeard, Marion, 2022. "How vegetation classification and mapping may influence conservation: The example of Brazil’s Native Vegetation Protection Law," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Clements, Hayley S. & Cumming, Graeme S., 2017. "Manager strategies and user demands: Determinants of cultural ecosystem service bundles on private protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 228-237.
    13. Drechsler, Martin, 2023. "Ecological and economic trade-offs between amount and spatial aggregation of conservation and the cost-effective design of coordination incentives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Keefe O. Keeley & Kevin J. Wolz & Kaitie I. Adams & Jeannine H. Richards & Erin Hannum & Severine von Tscharner Fleming & Stephen J. Ventura, 2019. "Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Seyed Mohammad Haghighi Fard & Naciye Doratli, 2022. "Evaluation of Resilience in Historic Urban Areas by Combining Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System and GIS, with Sustainability and Regeneration Approach: The Case Study of Tehran (IRAN)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Hayley S. Clements & Matthew F. Child & Lehman Lindeque & Kyra Lunderstedt & Alta Vos, 2022. "Lessons from COVID-19 for wildlife ranching in a changing world," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1040-1048, December.
    17. Justyna Przywojska, 2021. "Polish Local Government’s Perspective on Revitalisation: A Framework for Future Socially Sustainable Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Grazia Brunetta & Stefano Salata, 2019. "Mapping Urban Resilience for Spatial Planning—A First Attempt to Measure the Vulnerability of the System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Adhikari, Ram K. & Grala, Robert K. & Grado, Stephen C. & Grebner, Donald L. & Petrolia, Daniel R., 2021. "Landowner concerns related to availability of ecosystem services and environmental issues in the southern United States," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    20. Zhenyu Xie & Benhong Peng, 2023. "A Framework for Resilient City Governance in Response to Sudden Weather Disasters: A Perspective Based on Accident Causation Theories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:5:p:84-:d:233862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.