IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i10p146-d274048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution and Collapse of Ejidos in Mexico—To What Extent Is Communal Land Used for Urban Development?

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa Schumacher

    (Department of Architecture, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Cholula 72810, Mexico)

  • Pamela Durán-Díaz

    (Associate Professorship of Land Management, Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja

    (Department of Architecture, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Cholula 72810, Mexico)

  • Eduardo Gutiérrez-Juárez

    (Department of Architecture, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Cholula 72810, Mexico)

  • David A. González-Rivas

    (Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noreste CONACYT, La Paz Baja California Sur 23205, Mexico)

Abstract

The ejido system, based on communal land in Mexico, was transformed to private ownership due to neoliberal trends in the 1990s. Based on the theory of stakeholders being agents of change, this study aimed to describe the land policies that changed the ejido system into private development to show how land tenure change is shaping urban growth. To demonstrate this, municipalities of San Andrés Cholula and Santa Clara Ocoyucan were selected as case studies. Within this context, we evaluated how much ejido land is being urbanized due to real estate market forces and what type of urbanization model has been created. These two areas represent different development scales with different stakeholders—San Andrés Cholula, where ejidos were expropriated as part of a regional urban development plan and Santa Clara Ocoyucan, where ejidos and rural land were reached by private developers without local planning. To analyze both municipalities, historical satellite images from Google Earth were used with GRASS GIS 7.4 (Bonn, Germany) and corrected with QGIS 2.18 (Boston, MA, US). We found that privatization of ejidos fragmented and segregated the rural world for the construction of massive gated communities as an effect of a disturbing land tenure change that has occurred over the last 30 years. Hence, this research questions the roles of local authorities in permitting land use changes with no regulations or local planning. The resulting urbanization model is a private sector development that isolates rural communities in their own territories, for which we provide recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa Schumacher & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Eduardo Gutiérrez-Juárez & David A. González-Rivas, 2019. "Evolution and Collapse of Ejidos in Mexico—To What Extent Is Communal Land Used for Urban Development?," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:10:p:146-:d:274048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/10/146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/10/146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gareth A. Jones & Peter M. Ward, 1998. "Privatizing the commons: reforming the ejido and urban development in Mexico," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 76-93, March.
    2. Louise Cord & Quentin Wodon, 2001. "Do Agricultural Programs in Mexico Alleviate Poverty? Evidence from the Ejido Sector," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 38(114), pages 239-256.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaopeng Sun & Zhongfa Zhou & Denghong Huang & Quan Chen & Min Fang, 2022. "The Spatial and Temporal Evolution Pattern and Transformation of Urban–Rural Construction Land in Karst Mountainous Areas: Qixingguan District of Guizhou, Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Victor Hugo Flores-Armillas & Xavier López-Medellín & Raúl García Barrios & Ian MacGregor-Fors & David Valenzuela-Galván, 2020. "Landscape Features Associated with Damage to Maize ( Zea mays ) Fields in Central México: A Comparison of Wind and Wildlife Damage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Juan Von Thaden & Gilberto Binnqüist-Cervantes & Octavio Pérez-Maqueo & Debora Lithgow, 2022. "Half-Century of Forest Change in a Neotropical Peri-Urban Landscape: Drivers and Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Eduardo Gutiérrez Juárez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher & María Guizar Villalvazo & Edwin Gonzalez Meza & Pamela Durán-Díaz, 2022. "Neoliberal Urban Development vs. Rural Communities: Land Management Challenges in San Andrés Cholula, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Gregory J. Scott & Enrique Vigo, 2023. "Growth, innovation, and policy for chicken in Latin America 1961–2019," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    6. Díaz Baca, Manuel Francisco & Moreno Lerma, Leonardo & Triana Ángel, Natalia & Burkart, Stefan, 2024. "The relationships between land tenure, cattle production, and climate change – A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Melissa Schumacher & María Guizar Villalvazo & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Pamela Durán-Díaz, 2022. "The Writ of Amparo and Indigenous Consultation as Instruments to Enforce Inclusive Land Management in San Andrés Cholula, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Leonardo Barleta & Mateo Carrillo & Zephyr Frank & Erik Steiner, 2020. "Ejidos, Urbanization, and the Production of Inequality in Formerly Agricultural Lands, Guadalajara, Mexico, 1975–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Pamela Durán-Díaz & Adriana Armenta-Ramírez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher, 2020. "Community Development through the Empowerment of Indigenous Women in Cuetzalan Del Progreso, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Johan Colding & Åsa Gren & Stephan Barthel, 2020. "The Incremental Demise of Urban Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monika Streule & Ozan Karaman & Lindsay Sawyer & Christian Schmid, 2020. "Popular Urbanization: Conceptualizing Urbanization Processes Beyond Informality," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 652-672, July.
    2. Annette M. Kim, 2011. "Introduction: Real Rights to the City—Cases of Property Rights Changes towards Equity in Eastern Asia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 459-469, February.
    3. Schmook, Birgit & Vance, Colin, 2009. "Agricultural Policy, Market Barriers, and Deforestation: The Case of Mexico's Southern Yucatn," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1015-1025, May.
    4. Daniel Otero Peña & Daniela Perrotti & Eugene Mohareb, 2022. "Advancing urban metabolism studies through GIS data: Resource flows, open space networks, and vulnerable communities in Mexico City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1333-1349, August.
    5. Wodon, Quentin & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2002. "Inequality and Social Welfare," MPRA Paper 12298, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Makdissi, Paul & Wodon, Quentin, 2005. "Poverty-dominant program reforms: the role of targeting and allocation rules," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 53-73, June.
    7. World Bank, 2004. "Mexico : Public Expenditure Review, Volume 2. Main Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 15660, The World Bank Group.
    8. Wodon, Quentin & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2002. "Inégalité et bien-être social [Inequality and Social Welfare]," MPRA Paper 10488, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Leonardo Barleta & Mateo Carrillo & Zephyr Frank & Erik Steiner, 2020. "Ejidos, Urbanization, and the Production of Inequality in Formerly Agricultural Lands, Guadalajara, Mexico, 1975–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Wodon, Quentin & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2002. "Неравенство И Общественное Благосостояние [Inequality and Social Welfare]," MPRA Paper 10489, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. World Bank, 2005. "Colombia : Country Economic Memorandum, The Foundations for Competitiveness," World Bank Publications - Reports 8807, The World Bank Group.
    12. Wodon, Quentin, 2001. "Government Programs and Poverty," MPRA Paper 12308, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Quentin Wodon & Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2002. "Evaluating the Impact of Government Programs on Social Welfare: The Role of Targeting and the Allocation Rules Among Program Beneficiaries," Public Finance Review, , vol. 30(2), pages 102-123, March.
    14. Huesca-Pérez, María Elena & Sheinbaum-Pardo, Claudia & Köppel, Johann, 2016. "Social implications of siting wind energy in a disadvantaged region – The case of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 952-965.
    15. Gabriel Gonzalez-Konig & Quentin Wodon, 2005. "Do Cash Transfers to Farmers Reduce Migration? Procampo in Mexico," Department of Economics and Finance Working Papers EC200501, Universidad de Guanajuato, Department of Economics and Finance, revised Aug 2005.
    16. Julie-Anne Boudreau & Liette Gilbert & Danielle Labbé, 2016. "Uneven state formalization and periurban housing production in Hanoi and Mexico City: Comparative reflections from the global South," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(12), pages 2383-2401, December.
    17. Davis, Benjamin & Handa, Sudhanshu & Ruiz-Arranz, Marta & Stampini, Marco & Winters, Paul, 2005. "An Impact Evaluation of Agricultural Subsidies on Human Capital Development and Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Rural Mexico," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 3004, Inter-American Development Bank.
    18. Henderson, Joanne & Baylis, Katherine R. & Barton, Jason, 2010. "Conversion from Staple to Cash Crop Production in Mexico After NAFTA: Effects of PROCAMPO and Credit Constraints," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61525, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Tellman, Beth & Eakin, Hallie & Janssen, Marco A. & de Alba, Felipe & Turner II, B.L., 2021. "The role of institutional entrepreneurs and informal land transactions in Mexico City’s urban expansion," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    20. Melanie Lombard, 2016. "Land conflict in peri-urban areas: Exploring the effects of land reform on informal settlement in Mexico," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(13), pages 2700-2720, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:10:p:146-:d:274048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.