IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1097-d1658455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between the Perceived Restorativeness of Urban Parks and Sociocultural Value: A Case Study of Labor Park in Dalian, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jidong Guo

    (Department of Cultural & Art Management, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyeogin Kwon

    (School of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Urban parks are important places, reflecting the culture of residential communities. The role of urban parks in providing cultural experiences and creating local cultural value is becoming increasingly prominent. Based on attention restoration theory (ART), this paper uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to verify the relationship between perceived restorativeness and various factors in the sociocultural value of urban parks. The results show that being away, fascination, coherence, and compatibility all have significant positive effects on residents’ aesthetics; being away and fascination have direct positive effects on well-being; and fascination, coherence, and compatibility have direct positive effects on place identity. Therefore, the paper concludes that urban parks play a key role as cultural spaces. A higher level of perceived restorativeness of urban parks helps to enhance the social and cultural value of the area, promote residents’ aesthetics and well-being, improve residents’ sense of local identity, help build community culture, and showcase local residents’ lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jidong Guo & Hyeogin Kwon, 2025. "The Relationship Between the Perceived Restorativeness of Urban Parks and Sociocultural Value: A Case Study of Labor Park in Dalian, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1097-:d:1658455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1097/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1097/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng, Jianchao & Yan, Siqi & Strijker, Dirk & Wu, Qun & Chen, Wei & Ma, Zhiyuan, 2020. "The influence of place identity on perceptions of landscape change: Exploring evidence from rural land consolidation projects in Eastern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Don-Gak Lee & Jin-Gun Kim & Bum-Jin Park & Won Sop Shin, 2022. "Effect of Forest Users’ Stress on Perceived Restorativeness, Forest Recreation Motivation, and Mental Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Lin-Lin Xue & Ching-Cheng Shen, 2022. "The Sustainable Development of Organic Agriculture: The Role of Wellness Tourism and Environmental Restorative Perception," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Bullock, Craig & Joyce, Deirdre & Collier, Marcus, 2018. "An exploration of the relationships between cultural ecosystem services, socio-cultural values and well-being," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 142-152.
    5. Ana Rosenbluth & Teresa Ropert & Vicente Rivera & Matías Villalobos-Morgado & Yerko Molina & Ignacio C. Fernández, 2024. "Between Struggle, Forgetfulness, and Placemaking: Meanings and Practices among Social Groups in a Metropolitan Urban Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Ksenia Kirillova & Xiaoxiao Fu & Deniz Kucukusta, 2020. "Workplace design and well-being: aesthetic perceptions of hotel employees," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1-2), pages 27-49, January.
    7. Yi-Ju Lee, 2024. "Destination fascination, well-being, and the reasonable person model of behavioural intention in heritage tourism," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 288-304, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrizio Scrima & Elena Foddai & Jean-Félix Hamel & Cindy Carrein-Lerouge & Olivier Codou & Benoit Montalan & Boris Vallée & Oulmann Zerhouni & Liliane Rioux & Pierenrico Marchesa, 2022. "Workplace Aesthetic Appreciation and Exhaustion in a COVID-19 Vaccination Center: The Role of Positive Affects and Interest in Art," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Xiao Han & Zhe Li & Haini Chen & Mengyao Yu & Yi Shi, 2025. "Structural Equation Model in Landscape Performance Research: Dimensions, Methodologies, and Recommendations," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Stefano Bigiotti & Mariangela Ludovica Santarsiero & Carlo Costantino & Alvaro Marucci, 2025. "Photovoltaic Technology and Rural Landscapes: A Systematic Literature Review on Challenges and Sustainable Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-54, April.
    4. Emel Baylan & Sanem Şehribanoğlu & Onur Şatır, 2025. "Contributions of cultural ESs to human well-being, landscape planning and rural development in border landscapes: Local Insights from the Bendimahi River Basin (Eastern Anatolia, Türkiye)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 5397-5419, February.
    5. Ching-Cheng Shen & Dan Wang & Jennifer Pasion Loverio, 2022. "Influence of Consumer Landscape on Place Attachment in Agritourism—The Case of Huatung, Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Zhigang Li & Zishu Sun & Yangjie Tian & Jialong Zhong & Wunian Yang, 2019. "Impact of Land Use/Cover Change on Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration Ecosystem Services Value: Temporal-Spatial Patterns and Cold/Hot Spots Ecosystem Services Value Change Brought by Urbanizatio," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Dalton Erick Baltazar & Jillian Labadz & Roy Smith & Andrew Telford & Marcello Di Bonito, 2022. "Socio-Cultural Valuation of Urban Parks: The Case of Jose Rizal Plaza in Calamba City, The Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Jingjie Liu & Min Xia, 2023. "Influencing Factors Analysis and Optimization of Land Use Allocation: Combining MAS with MOPSO Procedure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Grainger, Daniel & Stoeckl, Natalie, 2019. "The importance of social learning for non-market valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Nápoles-Vértiz, Sonia & Caro-Borrero, Angela, 2024. "Conceptual diversity and application of ecosystem services and disservices: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Stamatiadou, Valentini & Mazaris, Antonios & Mallios, Zisis & Katsanevakis, Stelios, 2023. "Valuation and mapping of the recreational diving ecosystem service of the Aegean Sea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Rosa, Josianne Claudia Sales & Geneletti, Davide & Morrison-Saunders, Angus & Sánchez, Luis Enrique & Hughes, Michael, 2020. "To what extent can mine rehabilitation restore recreational use of forest land? Learning from 50 years of practice in southwest Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Youcheng Chen & Sunbowen Zhang & Wenqi Ruan & Yongqiang Ma & Meiyu Wang & Yan Zhou, 2024. "What kind of UGA is effective for heritage tourism marketing? Matching effects of human elements and review types," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Leticia Rodriguez Ocana & Antonio Miguel Nogues & Juan Carlos Mandujano Contreras & Herminia Banda Izeta, 2023. "Value Perceptions Of Culturalenvironmental Services In Tacotalpa, Tabasco," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 17(1), pages 25-41.
    15. Constant, Natasha Louise & Taylor, Peter John, 2020. "Restoring the forest revives our culture: Ecosystem services and values for ecological restoration across the rural-urban nexus in South Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Nowak-Olejnik, Agnieszka & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2022. "A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    17. Kristina Veidemane & Agnese Reke & Anda Ruskule & Ivo Vinogradovs, 2024. "Assessment of Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services and Well-Being for Integrating Stakeholder Values into Coastal Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-34, March.
    18. Xiaowan Dong & Yuhui Xu & Xiangmei Li, 2023. "The Proactive Effects of Built Environment on Rural Community Resilience: Evidence from China Family Panel Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Diana Maria Patulea & Andreea Marin-Pantelescu, 2018. "Exploratory Research in the Tertiary Sector: Romanian Preferences for Cultural Services," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 83-94, July.
    20. Malinauskaite, Laura & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Ögmundardóttir, Helga, 2021. "Socio-cultural valuation of whale ecosystem services in Skjálfandi Bay, Iceland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1097-:d:1658455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.