IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1086-d1657325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human–Nature Relationships in Country Parks at the Urban–Rural Fringe: A Case Study of the Huitian Region, Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenyu Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Aibo Jin

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Weijie Zhuang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    PowerChina Huadong Engineering Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311122, China)

  • Hui Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Urban green spaces face increasing pressure to reconcile ecological conservation with rising public demand as urbanization accelerates. Yet the spatial coupling of human needs and natural provisioning in the urban–rural fringe remains insufficiently understood. Focusing on the country park cluster in Beijing’s Huitian region, this study develops an integrated assessment framework—combining ecological importance, ecological connectivity potential, construction suitability, and recreational demand—to evaluate nature suitability and pinpoint spatial mismatches in human–nature interactions. Ecological importance is quantified through ecological sensitivity analysis and InVEST-based habitat-quality modeling, while ecological connectivity potential is estimated via normalized least-cost corridor analysis. Construction suitability is derived from the proportion of artificial surfaces and road network density, and recreational demand is measured by population concentration, facility density, and transport accessibility. These metrics are synthesized to map nature-suitability patterns and reveal divergences between human demand and ecological provisioning. The results show a pronounced north–south gradient in ecological importance, with Dongxiaokou Ditch and Dongxiaokou Forest Park emerging as ecological hotspots. Nineteen ecological source patches are identified, with the strongest connectivity in the southern sector of Dongxiaokou Forest Park. Areas of high construction suitability coincide with well-developed infrastructure, whereas recreational demand clusters around Tiantongyuan and Beiqing Road. Natural and artificial elements intertwine to form an ecological core of 870.74 hm 2 , yet 13.29% of the study area exhibits mismatches—particularly residential zones lacking green-space access. Over-development within Dongxiaokou Urban Recreation Park likewise falls short of ecological expectations. The study offers targeted recommendations—ecological protection, facility optimization, green-space enhancement, and the integration of multifunctional green infrastructure—and provides a transferable framework for coordinating human and natural systems in other urban–rural fringe contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenyu Li & Aibo Jin & Weijie Zhuang & Hui Li, 2025. "Human–Nature Relationships in Country Parks at the Urban–Rural Fringe: A Case Study of the Huitian Region, Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1086-:d:1657325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pingyang Han & Haozhi Hu & Mengting Jiang & Min Wang, 2024. "Construction of Wetland Ecological Security Pattern in Wuhan Metropolitan Core Area Considering Wetland Ecological Risk," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Hui Sun & Chunhui Liu & Jiaxing Wei, 2021. "Identifying Key Sites of Green Infrastructure to Support Ecological Restoration in the Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Graeme S. Cumming & Andreas Buerkert & Ellen M. Hoffmann & Eva Schlecht & Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel & Teja Tscharntke, 2014. "Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7525), pages 50-57, November.
    4. Csomós, György & Szalai, Ádám & Farkas, Jenő Zsolt, 2024. "A sacrifice for the greater good? On the main drivers of excessive land take and land use change in Hungary," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Álvaro Navas González & Richard J. Hewitt & Javier Martínez-Vega, 2024. "Green Infrastructure Mapping in Almeria Province (Spain) Using Geographical Information Systems and Multi-Criteria Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Sheela Bhuvanendran Bhagya & Anita Saji Sumi & Sankaran Balaji & Jean Homian Danumah & Romulus Costache & Ambujendran Rajaneesh & Ajayakumar Gokul & Chandini Padmanabhapanicker Chandrasenan & Renata P, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of a Part of the Western Ghats (India) Employing the AHP and F-AHP Models and Comparison with Existing Susceptibility Maps," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duy X. Tran & Diane Pearson & Alan Palmer & David Gray, 2020. "Developing a Landscape Design Approach for the Sustainable Land Management of Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Dai, Xuhuan & Li, Bo & Zheng, Hua & Yang, Yanzheng & Yang, Zihan & Peng, Chenchen, 2023. "Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Verena Preusse & Nils Nölke & Meike Wollni, 2024. "Urbanization and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in the rural‐urban interface of Bangalore, India," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(2), pages 167-198, June.
    4. Xiaomeng Guo & Li Wang & Qiang Fu & Fang Ma, 2024. "Ecological Function Zoning Framework for Small Watershed Ecosystem Services Based on Multivariate Analysis from a Scale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Yaofeng Yang & Yajuan Chen & Zhenrong Yu & Pengyao Li & Xuedong Li, 2020. "How Does Improve Farmers’ Attitudes toward Ecosystem Services to Support Sustainable Development of Agriculture? Based on Environmental Kuznets Curve Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Xing Liu & Zhaoyang Cai & Yan Xu & Huihui Zheng & Kaige Wang & Fengrong Zhang, 2022. "Suitability Evaluation of Cultivated Land Reserved Resources in Arid Areas Based on Regional Water Balance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(4), pages 1463-1479, March.
    7. Qindong Fan & Xiaoyu Yang & Chenming Zhang, 2022. "A Review of Ecosystem Services Research Focusing on China against the Background of Urbanization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Targetti, Stefano & Schaller, Lena L. & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2021. "A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach for the assessment of public-goods governance in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Wu, Tong & Rocha, Juan C. & Berry, Kevin & Chaigneau, Tomas & Hamann, Maike & Lindkvist, Emilie & Qiu, Jiangxiao & Schill, Caroline & Shepon, Alon & Crépin, Anne-Sophie & Folke, Carl, 2024. "Triple Bottom Line or Trilemma? Global Tradeoffs Between Prosperity, Inequality, and the Environment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Chen Zeng & Xiangzheng Deng & Jianing Dong & Peiying Hu, 2016. "Urbanization and Sustainability: Comparison of the Processes in “BIC” Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Klimanova, O.A. & Bukvareva, E.N. & Yu, Kolbowsky E. & Illarionova, O.A., 2023. "Assessing ecosystem services in Russia: Case studies from four municipal districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Dardonville, Manon & Legrand, Baptiste & Clivot, Hugues & Bernardin, Claire & Bockstaller, Christian & Therond, Olivier, 2022. "Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Hualin Xie & Zhe Li & Yu Xu, 2022. "Study on the Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) and Regional Economic System: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Zuxuan Song & Fangmei Liu & Wenbo Lv & Jianwu Yan, 2023. "Classification of Urban Agricultural Functional Regions and Their Carbon Effects at the County Level in the Pearl River Delta, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, September.
    17. Xue Jiang & Shuhan Man & Xianglong Zhu & Hongyu Zhao & Tianjiao Yan, 2024. "Sustainable Protection Strategies for Traditional Villages Based on a Socio-Ecological Systems Spatial Pattern Evaluation: A Case Study from Jinjiang River Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-30, September.
    18. Johannes Bettin & Meike Wollni, 2020. "Environmental Concern and Urbanization in India: Towards Psychological Complexity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Xiaoyan Ren & Yuhao Yang & Zongming Wang, 2023. "A Long-Term and Comprehensive Assessment of the Ecological Costs Arising from Urban Agglomeration Expansion in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Bertrand F. Nero & Nana Afranaa Kwapong & Raymond Jatta & Oluwole Fatunbi, 2018. "Tree Species Diversity and Socioeconomic Perspectives of the Urban (Food) Forest of Accra, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1086-:d:1657325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.