IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p637-d1614417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Ecosystem Services and Their Ecological Security Patterns in the Guanzhong–Tianshui Economic Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhou

    (Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
    College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jianhua Xiao

    (Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Daiying Yin

    (Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yu Ren

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

The Guanzhong–Tianshui economic zone is a strategic link in China’s Belt and Road network, faces the contradiction between ecological protection and economic development, and urgently needs to construct an ecological security pattern based on ecosystem services to permit sustainable development. In this study, we evaluated the ecological services of net primary productivity ( NPP ), water yield ( WY ), soil conservation ( SC ), habitat quality ( HQ ), and food production ( FP ). We explored the trade-offs and synergies between services using correlation analysis and geographically weighted regression and constructed an ecological security pattern through circuit theory. NPP , WY , SC , and FP increased during the study period, whereas HQ decreased. The NPP × WY , WY × SC , and WY × HQ shifted from synergies to trade-offs; NPP × SC , NPP × HQ , and SC × HQ were always synergies; NPP × FP , SC × FP , and FP × HQ were always trade-offs; and WY × FP shifted from trade-offs to synergies. We selected service bundles with significant synergies among NPP , SC , and HQ as ecological sources, which were mainly in the Qinling and Weibei mountains, comprising 47 ecological patches. We identified 58 ecological corridors, 330.83 km 2 of pinch points, and 401.30 km 2 of barriers, which form a mesh structure covering the study area, proposing a development pattern of six zones and one belt. Our results provide a framework for ecological protection and restoration, which may serve as a scientific foundation for upcoming regional land management initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhou & Jianhua Xiao & Daiying Yin & Yu Ren, 2025. "Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Ecosystem Services and Their Ecological Security Patterns in the Guanzhong–Tianshui Economic Zone," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:637-:d:1614417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/637/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/637/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keyu Qin & Jing Li & Xiaonan Yang, 2015. "Trade-Off and Synergy among Ecosystem Services in the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Feng, Dingrao & Bao, Wenkai & Yang, Yuanyuan & Fu, Meichen, 2021. "How do government policies promote greening? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingya Liu & Jing Li & Ziyi Gao & Min Yang & Keyu Qin & Xiaonan Yang, 2016. "Ecosystem Services Insights into Water Resources Management in China: A Case of Xi’an City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Jinlong Chen & Zhonglei Yu & Mengxia Li & Xiao Huang, 2023. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Vegetation Coverage in Urban Built-Up Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Yuchen Zhang & Jianghong Zhu & Lin Wang & Ke Wang & Jianjun Zhang, 2024. "Policy-Driven Vegetation Restoration in Qinghai Province: Spatiotemporal Analysis and Policy Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Ziyi Hua & Jing Ma & Yan Sun & Yongjun Yang & Xinhua Zhu & Fu Chen, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulating the Impacts of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Health in Urban Agglomerations on the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountain, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Yanhai Zhou & Jianwei Geng & Xingzhao Liu, 2024. "Urban Habitat Quality Enhancement and Optimization under Ecological Network Constraints," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Huihui Yang & Shuiyu Yan & Xinhao Wang & Chun Li & Haixing Meng & Qiang Yao, 2024. "Constructing Ecological Networks Based on Ecosystem Services and Network Analysis in Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Fengyu Wang & Shuai Tong & Yun Chu & Tianlong Liu & Xiang Ji, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Key Areas of Territorial Ecological Restoration in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Jiawang District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Ma, Dan & Zhu, Qing, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 801-813.
    10. Haoyu Tao & Xiaodan Li & Zhen Liu & Zhiping Liu & Jing Li & Yangyang Wang, 2024. "A Method for the Transformation of Abandoned Coal Mine Clusters and the Coordination Planning of Cultural Tourism Resources," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Jingya Liu & Keyu Qin & Yu Xiao & Gaodi Xie, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Scenario Insights into Spatial Responses and Promotion Under Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Zhou, Yang & Zhong, Zhen & Cheng, Guoqiang, 2023. "Cultivated land loss and construction land expansion in China: Evidence from national land surveys in 1996, 2009 and 2019," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Chunhua Li & Jin Wang & Xincen Liu & Kejian Xu, 2024. "Construction of Karst Landscape Ecological Security Pattern Based on Conflict between Human and Nature in Puzhehei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Wang, Xiaoqi & Zhao, Xueyan, 2023. "Farmers' perception and choice preference of grassland ecosystem services: Evidence from the northeastern region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Yiting Zuo & Jie Cheng & Meichen Fu, 2022. "Analysis of Land Use Change and the Role of Policy Dimensions in Ecologically Complex Areas: A Case Study in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, April.
    16. Yuhu Cui & Hu Tian & Dong An & Yonghua Jia, 2024. "Quality of life and regional economic development: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Longyun Deng & Yi Li & Zhi Cao & Ruifang Hao & Zheye Wang & Junxiao Zou & Quanyuan Wu & Jianmin Qiao, 2022. "Revealing Impacts of Human Activities and Natural Factors on Dynamic Changes of Relationships among Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:637-:d:1614417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.