IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i9p1733-d1234203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Key Areas of Territorial Ecological Restoration in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Jiawang District, China

Author

Listed:
  • Fengyu Wang

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Shuai Tong

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yun Chu

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Tianlong Liu

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xiang Ji

    (Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Saving and Construction Technology, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221000, China)

Abstract

Resource-exhausted cities usually face problems of environmental degradation, landscape fragmentation, and impeded ecological mobility. By clarifying the spatial heterogeneity of ecological restoration needs, efficient and coordinated ecological protection and restoration can be carried out. This study selected Jiawang District, a typical resource-exhausted city, and constructed an ecological security evaluation framework to determine the ecological source area from the three aspects of ecosystem service importance, ecological sensitivity, and landscape stability. The resistance surface was corrected with ecological sensitivity evaluation data, and ecological corridors and ecological nodes were identified using circuit theory. Finally, it explored the spatial and temporal evolution of the key areas of territorial ecological restoration in Jiawang District. This study indicates that: (1) In 2000, 2010, and 2020, the ecological source areas were 123.59 km 2 , 116.18 km 2 , and 125.25 km 2 , and the corresponding numbers of ecological corridors were 53, 51, and 49. The total lengths of the ecological corridors were 129.25 km, 118.57 km, and 112.25 km, mainly distributed in the northern and central areas of the study area. (2) The study area contained 17, 13, and 19 ecological pinch points in 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively, 16, 20, and 15 ecological obstacle points, and 8, 24, and 33 ecological fracture points, respectively. Targeted rehabilitation of these key areas can significantly improve ecological connectivity. (3) The key area of territorial ecological restoration in 2020 was composed of 125.25 km 2 ecological source area, 8.77 km 2 of ecological pinch point, 12.70 km 2 of ecological obstacle point, and 33 ecological fracture points. According to the present situation of land use, protection strategies are put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengyu Wang & Shuai Tong & Yun Chu & Tianlong Liu & Xiang Ji, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Key Areas of Territorial Ecological Restoration in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Jiawang District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1733-:d:1234203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1733/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1733/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuewei Hu & Wenwen Xu & Fayong Li, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Optimization of Landscape Patterns Based on the Ecological Restoration of Territorial Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Hebing Zhang & Qingqing Yan & Fangfang Xie & Shouchen Ma, 2023. "Evaluation and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Security Based on a CA-Markov Model in Overlapped Area of Crop and Coal Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Di Marino, Mina & Tiitu, Maija & Lapintie, Kimmo & Viinikka, Arto & Kopperoinen, Leena, 2019. "Integrating green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning. Results from two Finnish case studies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 643-656.
    4. Hui Ye & Zhaoping Yang & Xiaoliang Xu, 2020. "Ecological Corridors Analysis Based on MSPA and MCR Model—A Case Study of the Tomur World Natural Heritage Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Shaokun Zhou & Yuhong Song & Yijiao Li & Jing Wang & Lan Zhang, 2022. "Construction of Ecological Security Pattern for Plateau Lake Based on MSPA–MCR Model: A Case Study of Dianchi Lake Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Hossain Mohammad Arifeen & Md. Shahariar Chowdhury & Haoran Zhang & Tanita Suepa & Nowshad Amin & Kuaanan Techato & Warangkana Jutidamrongphan, 2021. "Role of a Mine in Changing Its Surroundings—Land Use and Land Cover and Impact on the Natural Environment in Barapukuria, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Yi-Xuan Liang & Da-Fang Wu & Zhao-Jun Wu & Yue Xu & Zi-Wen Zhu & Yu-Cheng Zhang & Hong Zhu, 2023. "Construction of Ecological Corridors in Karst Areas Based on Ecological Sensitivity and Ecological Service Value," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Jiulin Li & Jiangang Xu & Jinlong Chu, 2019. "The Construction of a Regional Ecological Security Pattern Based on Circuit Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Zhen Du & Li Feng & Haiheng Wang & Ying Dong & Da Luo & Xu Zhang & Hao Liu & Maosheng Zhang, 2023. "Identification of Ground Deformation Patterns in Coal Mining Areas via Rapid Topographical Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Xinlei Xu & Siyuan Wang & Gege Yan & Xinyi He, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment Based on the “Importance–Sensitivity–Connectivity” Index and Pattern Construction: A Case Study of Xiliu Ditch in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Juntao Tan & Pingyu Zhang & Kevin Lo & Jing Li & Shiwei Liu, 2016. "The Urban Transition Performance of Resource-Based Cities in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Xinke Wang & Xiangqun Xie & Zhenfeng Wang & Hong Lin & Yan Liu & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Security Pattern Based on the MCR Model: A Case Study of the Minjiang River Basin in Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Chunguang Hu & Zhiyong Wang & Gaoliu Huang & Yichen Ding, 2022. "Construction, Evaluation, and Optimization of a Regional Ecological Security Pattern Based on MSPA–Circuit Theory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Yongyu Zhao & Alimujiang Kasimu & Hongwu Liang & Rukeya Reheman, 2022. "Construction and Restoration of Landscape Ecological Network in Urumqi City Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Fangning Shi & Shiliang Liu & Yi An & Yongxiu Sun & Shuang Zhao & Yixuan Liu & Mingqi Li, 2020. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Landscape Connectivity and Ecological Network Construction in Long Yangxia Basin at the Upper Yellow River," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Georgina Mace, 2013. "Global change: Ecology must evolve," Nature, Nature, vol. 503(7475), pages 191-192, November.
    19. Takatsuka, Hajime & Zeng, Dao-Zhi & Zhao, Laixun, 2015. "Resource-based cities and the Dutch disease," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 57-84.
    20. Bo Wen & Yunhua Pan & Yanyuan Zhang & Jingjie Liu & Min Xia, 2018. "Does the Exhaustion of Resources Drive Land Use Changes? Evidence from the Influence of Coal Resources-Exhaustion on Coal Resources–Based Industry Land Use Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    21. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geng-Wei Liu & Chang-Lei Dai & Ze-Xuan Shao & Rui-Han Xiao & Hong-Cong Guo, 2024. "Assessment of Ecological Flow in Hulan River Basin Utilizing SWAT Model and Diverse Hydrological Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Zixuan Li & Jiang Chang & Cheng Li & Sihao Gu, 2023. "Ecological Restoration and Protection of National Land Space in Coal Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Yulin Liu & Yi Lu & Dawei Xu & Herui Zhou & Shengnan Zhang, 2024. "Enhancing the MSPA Method to Incorporate Ecological Sensitivity: Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Harbin City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Jiaqi Hu & Sheng Jiao & Huiwen Xia & Qiaoyun Qian, 2023. "Construction of Rural Multifunctional Landscape Corridor Based on MSPA and MCR Model—Taking Liukeng Cultural and Ecological Tourism Area as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Yanping Yang & Jianjun Chen & Renjie Huang & Zihao Feng & Guoqing Zhou & Haotian You & Xiaowen Han, 2022. "Construction of Ecological Security Pattern Based on the Importance of Ecological Protection—A Case Study of Guangxi, a Karst Region in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Jia Xu & Dawei Xu & Chen Qu, 2022. "Construction of Ecological Security Pattern and Identification of Ecological Restoration Zones in the City of Changchun, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Shiru Wang & Qian Song & Jianyun Zhao & Zhibo Lu & Haoxiang Zhang, 2023. "Identification of Key Areas and Early-Warning Points for Ecological Protection and Restoration in the Yellow River Source Area Based on Ecological Security Pattern," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Shaobo Liu & Yiting Xia & Yifeng Ji & Wenbo Lai & Jiang Li & Yicheng Yin & Jialing Qi & Yating Chang & Hao Sun, 2023. "Balancing Urban Expansion and Ecological Connectivity through Ecological Network Optimization—A Case Study of ChangSha County," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Yiming Liu & Nan Cui & Rui Han & Luo Guo, 2020. "Establishing Ecological Security Patterns Based on Reconstructed Ecosystem Services Value in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas: A Case Study in Zhuhai City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Li, Cunfang & Li, Danping & Zhang, Xiaoxu, 2019. "Why can China's coal resource-exhausted enterprises cross the district to transfer?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 94-105.
    12. Conway, Tenley M. & Khan, Aliza & Esak, Nasra, 2020. "An analysis of green infrastructure in municipal policy: Divergent meaning and terminology in the Greater Toronto Area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Mengyuan Su & Xiaoqian Fang & Kaiying Sun & Jiahao Bao & Yu Cao, 2023. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in the Comprehensive Land Consolidation Project of a Small Rural Town in Southeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Xifan Chen & Lihua Xu & Rusong Zhu & Qiwei Ma & Yijun Shi & Zhangwei Lu, 2022. "Changes and Characteristics of Green Infrastructure Network Based on Spatio-Temporal Priority," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Zechen Wang & Zhenqin Shi & Jingeng Huo & Wenbo Zhu & Yanhui Yan & Na Ding, 2023. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Funiu Mountain Area Based on MSPA and MCR Models, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    17. Zixuan Lian & Xianhui Feng, 2022. "Urban Green Space Pattern in Core Cities of the Greater Bay Area Based on Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Lili Du & Yunbing Hou & Shuheng Zhong & Kai Qu, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration in Coal Mining Areas with a High Groundwater Table Based on Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Jin, Ming & Han, Xulong & Li, Mingyu, 2023. "Trade-offs of multiple urban ecosystem services based on land-use scenarios in the Tumen River cross-border area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1733-:d:1234203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.