IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p575-d1608520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Creates Unsafe Feelings in Rural Landscapes: A Study of Perceived Safety Based on Facial Expression Recognition

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayi Wang

    (College of Arts, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

  • Zhenhong Yang

    (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Yu Lei

    (College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

  • Tianhang Peng

    (School of Mathematics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

  • Tao Long

    (West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

  • Jiayi Liu

    (College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

  • Haonan Li

    (College of Arts, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

  • Jie Yang

    (College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

  • Miao Lu

    (College of Arts, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610017, China)

Abstract

Over 3 billion people live in rural, unincorporated areas globally, which are vital for habitation and production. The perceived safety of these landscapes significantly impacts health and well-being. However, rural areas, as natural environments for urban populations to connect with nature, have not been sufficiently addressed in terms of safety concerns. Negative factors often outweigh those promoting safety, limiting the restorative potential of rural landscapes. This study collected rural audio–visual samples through photography and recording, captured facial emotional responses using facial expression recognition models, collected psychological response data using the rural perceived unsafety scale, and statistically evaluated safety perceptions in rural landscapes. Results indicate that (1) audio stimuli exert a stronger influence on perceived unsafety than visual stimuli, with an EUPI (Emotional Unsafety Perception Index) value 44.8% higher under audio conditions than visual conditions; (2) artificial sounds amplify perceived unsafety by 30.9% compared to natural sounds; (3) different animal sounds show significant variations in reducing perceived unsafety, with birds and pigs identified as positive factors; (4) visual factors like plant shading and buildings strongly increase perceived unsafety; and (5) audio–visual matching complicates perceived safety. For the first time, we identify auditory stimuli as the dominant factor in perceived safety in rural landscapes. These insights establish a scientific foundation and practical guidance for improving perceived safety in rural environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayi Wang & Zhenhong Yang & Yu Lei & Tianhang Peng & Tao Long & Jiayi Liu & Haonan Li & Jie Yang & Miao Lu, 2025. "What Creates Unsafe Feelings in Rural Landscapes: A Study of Perceived Safety Based on Facial Expression Recognition," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:575-:d:1608520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jos F. Brosschot & Bart Verkuil & Julian F. Thayer, 2018. "Generalized Unsafety Theory of Stress: Unsafe Environments and Conditions, and the Default Stress Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Marcus Hedblom & Bengt Gunnarsson & Martin Schaefer & Igor Knez & Pontus Thorsson & Johan N. Lundström, 2019. "Sounds of Nature in the City: No Evidence of Bird Song Improving Stress Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Shuai Jiang & Haoran Ma & Ling Yang & Shixian Luo, 2023. "The Influence of Perceived Physical and Aesthetic Quality of Rural Settlements on Tourists’ Preferences—A Case Study of Zhaoxing Dong Village," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Cristina Calleri & Arianna Astolfi & Anna Pellegrino & Francesco Aletta & Louena Shtrepi & Elena Bo & Martina Di Stefano & Paola Orecchia, 2019. "The Effect of Soundscapes and Lightscapes on the Perception of Safety and Social Presence Analyzed in a Laboratory Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Zhenhong Yang & Xiaoying Zhao & Lin Zhu & Yishi Xia & Yixin Ma & Jingyan Wu & Xueqian Xiong & Ni Yang & Miao Lu, 2023. "Research on the Healing Potential of Urban Parks from the Perspective of Audio-Visual Integration: A Case Study of Five Urban Parks in Chengdu," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Qi Meng & Jiani Jiang & Fangfang Liu & Xiaoduo Xu, 2020. "Effects of the Musical Sound Environment on Communicating Emotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Aletta & Jian Kang, 2019. "Promoting Healthy and Supportive Acoustic Environments: Going beyond the Quietness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-4, December.
    2. Jie Yin & Lili Zhao, 2024. "The Value Expression and Driving Factors of Rural Spatial Ecological Products: A Case Study of B&Bs in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Niclas Almén, 2021. "A Cognitive Behavioral Model Proposing That Clinical Burnout May Maintain Itself," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Chelsea E. Romney & Amber Carmen Arroyo & Theodore F. Robles & Matthew J. Zawadzki, 2023. "Hugs and Cortisol Awakening Response the Next Day: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Yiting Zhu & Xueru Pang & Chunshan Zhou, 2023. "Key Area Recognition and Evaluation of Audio-Visual Landscape for Global Geoparks: A Case Study of Koktokay in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Paul Devos & Francesco Aletta & Pieter Thomas & Mirko Petrovic & Tara Vander Mynsbrugge & Dominique Van de Velde & Patricia De Vriendt & Dick Botteldooren, 2019. "Designing Supportive Soundscapes for Nursing Home Residents with Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Djihed Berkouk & Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir & Luigi Maffei & Massimiliano Masullo, 2020. "Examining the Associations between Oases Soundscape Components and Walking Speed: Correlation or Causation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Ali Hosseini & Leila Kowkabi, 2023. "Measuring the Soundscape Quality in Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Historic Urban Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Agustín Castillo-Martínez & Antonio Peña-García, 2021. "Influence of Groves on Daylight Conditions and Visual Performance of Users of Urban Civil Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-9, November.
    11. Fangfang Liu & Jian Kang & Yue Wu & Da Yang & Qi Meng, 2022. "What do we visually focus on in a World Heritage Site? A case study in the Historic Centre of Prague," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Jianfeng Wu & Lingyan Zhang & Hongchun Yang & Chunfu Lu & Lu Jiang & Yuyun Chen, 2022. "The Effect of Music Tempo on Fatigue Perception at Different Exercise Intensities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Seyed Mojtaba Fakhrahmad & Ali Soltani & Mohamad Roosta, 2022. "Assessment of travelers’ fear of crime in intercity bus terminals: the case of Karandish terminal of Shiraz," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 69-85, June.
    14. Marina Eirini Stamatiadou & Iordanis Thoidis & Nikolaos Vryzas & Lazaros Vrysis & Charalampos Dimoulas, 2021. "Semantic Crowdsourcing of Soundscapes Heritage: A Mojo Model for Data-Driven Storytelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Wen Dong & Donghui Dai & Pengyuan Shen & Rui Zhang & Mei Liu, 2024. "How Public Urban Space Enhance Restoration Benefits Through Combined Multisensory Effects: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Bey, Ganga S., 2022. "The Identity Vitality-Pathology model: A novel theoretical framework proposing “identity state” as a modulator of the pathways from structural to health inequity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    17. Yasushi Suko & Tomoharu Shindo & Kaoru Saito & Norimasa Takayama & Shin’ichi Warisawa & Tetsuya Sakuma & Masaaki Ito & Pasi Kytölä & Tapio Nummi & Kalevi Korpela, 2022. "Alleviating Surgeons’ Stress through Listening to Natural Sounds in a Half-Encapsulated Rest Space after an Operation: A Pilot, Longitudinal Field Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Xinhui Fei & Yuanjing Wu & Jianwen Dong & Deyi Kong, 2025. "The Effects of Soundscape Interactions on the Restorative Potential of Urban Green Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Shilun Zhang & Xiaolong Zhao & Zixi Zeng & Xuan Qiu, 2019. "The Influence of Audio-Visual Interactions on Psychological Responses of Young People in Urban Green Areas: A Case Study in Two Parks in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Williams, DeWayne P. & Jones, Nickolas M. & Holman, E. Alison, 2022. "Racial and ethnic differences in perseverative cognition at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:575-:d:1608520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.