IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1542-d1210209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Perceived Physical and Aesthetic Quality of Rural Settlements on Tourists’ Preferences—A Case Study of Zhaoxing Dong Village

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Jiang

    (School of Arts, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China)

  • Haoran Ma

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Ling Yang

    (School of Arts, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China)

  • Shixian Luo

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

Abstract

Rural settlements, as crucial human habitats, encompass various values such as residential living, cultural tourism, and industrial development. This paper investigates the environmental physical and aesthetic factors perceived by tourists, which influence their preferences for rural settlement environments. Previous studies have predominantly focused on evaluating the impacts of physical or aesthetic factors on tourists’ environmental preferences, with limited research simultaneously examining their combined effects. To reduce this research gap, we selected Zhaoxing Dong Village in China, characterized by typical rural environmental traits, and collected 450 valid questionnaires. The questionnaire data underwent correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The results indicate that when considering only environmental physical quality factors, most of the physical quality factors are significantly correlated with tourists’ preferences. Among them, “visual quality” shows the highest correlation, followed by “facility” and “maintenance”, while “security” shows the lowest correlation. When aesthetic quality factors are added to the model as independent variables, they enhance the explanatory power of the model and exhibit more significant associations compared to the relationship between physical quality factors and preferences. Among the aesthetic quality factors, “multisensory” and “sublime” demonstrate the highest correlation, whereas “diversity” shows the lowest correlation. The current study demonstrates the validity of the two scales for measuring tourists’ perceived levels of physical and aesthetic quality in rural settlement environments. These findings contribute to the effective utilization of environmental capital within rural settlements and provide guidance for rural settlement planning and design.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Jiang & Haoran Ma & Ling Yang & Shixian Luo, 2023. "The Influence of Perceived Physical and Aesthetic Quality of Rural Settlements on Tourists’ Preferences—A Case Study of Zhaoxing Dong Village," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1542-:d:1210209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shixian Luo & Jing Xie & Katsunori Furuya, 2021. "Assessing the Preference and Restorative Potential of Urban Park Blue Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Alexander Trukhachev, 2015. "Methodology for Evaluating the Rural Tourism Potentials: A Tool to Ensure Sustainable Development of Rural Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Šťastná, Milada & Vaishar, Antonín, 2020. "Values of rural landscape: The case study Chlum u Třeboně (Bohemia)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Susanne Boers & Karin Hagoort & Floortje Scheepers & Marco Helbich, 2018. "Does Residential Green and Blue Space Promote Recovery in Psychotic Disorders? A Cross-Sectional Study in the Province of Utrecht, The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-8, October.
    5. Hee-Sun Cho & Byungseol Byun & Sunmi Shin, 2014. "An Examination of the Relationship between Rural Tourists’ Satisfaction, Revisitation and Information Preferences: A Korean Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Jaecheol Kim & Seungnam Kim, 2019. "Finding the Optimal D/H Ratio for an Enclosed Urban Square: Testing an Urban Design Principle Using Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Techniques," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Tiziano Cattaneo & Emanuele Giorgi & Minqing Ni, 2018. "Landscape, Architecture and Environmental Regeneration: A Research by Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism in a Rural Village in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Yin & Lili Zhao, 2024. "The Value Expression and Driving Factors of Rural Spatial Ecological Products: A Case Study of B&Bs in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weijia Wang & Makoto Watanabe & Donghong Zhou & Kenta Ono, 2023. "Environmental and Community Regeneration: Exploring Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism Based on Visualization Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Avram, Daniel, 2016. "Ways of increasing the visibility of the Romanian rural tourism," MPRA Paper 76894, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Berta Ferrer-Rosell & Germa Coenders & Estela Marine-Roig, 2017. "Is planning through the Internet (un)related to trip satisfaction?," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 229-244, June.
    4. Rui Zhou & Ying-Jing Zheng & Jing-Yi Yun & Hong-Mei Wang, 2022. "The Effects of Urban Green Space on Depressive Symptoms of Mid-Aged and Elderly Urban Residents in China: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Ahmed Ehab & Tim Heath, 2023. "Exploring Immersive Co-Design: Comparing Human Interaction in Real and Virtual Elevated Urban Spaces in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Haeryung Lee & Seung-Nam Kim, 2021. "Perceived Safety and Pedestrian Performance in Pedestrian Priority Streets (PPSs) in Seoul, Korea: A Virtual Reality Experiment and Trace Mapping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Huiyun Peng & Xiangjin Li & Tingting Yang & Shaohua Tan, 2023. "Research on the Relationship between the Environmental Characteristics of Pocket Parks and Young People’s Perception of the Restorative Effects—A Case Study Based on Chongqing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Qindong Fan & Fengtian Du & Hu Li, 2020. "A Study of the Spatial Form of Maling Village, Henan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Resmiye Alpar Atun & Hassina Nafa & Özlem Olgaç Türker, 2019. "Envisaging sustainable rural development through ‘context-dependent tourism’: case of northern Cyprus," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1715-1744, August.
    10. Jose Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, 2020. "Combining Participatory Processes and Sustainable Development Goals to Revitalize a Rural Area in Cantabria (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, October.
    11. Laura Parte & Pilar Alberca, 2021. "Business Performance and Sustainability in Cultural and Rural Tourism Destinations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Ohe, Yasuo & Ikei, Harumi & Song, Chorong & Miyazaki, Yoshifumi, 2017. "Evaluating the relaxation effects of emerging forest-therapy tourism: A multidisciplinary approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 322-334.
    13. Jaewon Han & Sugie Lee, 2023. "Verification of Immersive Virtual Reality as a Streetscape Evaluation Method in Urban Residential Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Hana Vavrouchová & Petra Fukalová & Hana Svobodová & Jan Oulehla & Pavla Pokorná, 2021. "Mapping Landscape Values and Conflicts through the Optics of Different User Groups," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Andreea M. Crăciun & Ștefan Dezsi & Florin Pop & Pintea Cecilia, 2022. "Rural Tourism—Viable Alternatives for Preserving Local Specificity and Sustainable Socio-Economic Development: Case Study—“Valley of the Kings” (Gurghiului Valley, Mureș County, Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-31, December.
    16. Iuliana Vijulie & Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Mihaela Preda & Alina Mareci & Elena Matei & Roxana Cuculici & Ana-Maria Taloș, 2021. "Certeze Village: The Dilemma of Traditional vs. Post-Modern Architecture in Țara Oașului, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Yu Sun & Xintong Ma & Yifeng Liu & Lingquan Meng, 2023. "Salary Satisfaction of Employees at Workplace on a Large Area of Planted Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Vladislav Valentinov & Gabriela Vaceková, 2015. "Sustainability of Rural Nonprofit Organizations: Czech Republic and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Hio-Jung Shin & Hyun No Kim & Jae-Young Son, 2017. "Measuring the Economic Impact of Rural Tourism Membership on Local Economy: A Korean Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Ionica SOARE & Florina Oana VIRLANUTA & Iulian Adrian SORCARU & Ludmila Daniela MANEA & Mihaela-Carmen MUNTEAN & Rozalia NISTOR, 2019. "Territorial Cohesion and Competitiveness in Tourism Development in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 129-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1542-:d:1210209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.