IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2073-d1773450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University Campuses as Vital Urban Green Infrastructure: Quantifying Ecosystem Services Based on Field Inventory in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Basil N. Yakimov

    (Faculty of Biology, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen 518172, China
    Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Gagarin Avenue 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603022, Russia)

  • Nataly I. Zaznobina

    (Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Gagarin Avenue 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603022, Russia)

  • Irina M. Kuznetsova

    (Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, HSE University, Myasnitskaya Ulitsa 20, Moscow 101000, Russia)

  • Angela D. Bolshakova

    (Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Gagarin Avenue 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603022, Russia)

  • Taisia A. Kovaleva

    (Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Gagarin Avenue 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603022, Russia)

  • Ivan N. Markelov

    (Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Gagarin Avenue 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603022, Russia)

  • Vladislav V. Onishchenko

    (The Center for Strategic Research, Gazetny Pereulok 1, Moscow 125009, Russia)

Abstract

This study provides the first comprehensive, field-inventory-based assessment of urban ecosystem services within a Russian university campus, focusing on the woody vegetation of the Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod. Utilizing a detailed field tree inventory combined with the i-Tree framework (including i-Tree Eco, i-Tree Canopy, UFORE, and i-Tree Hydro models), we quantified the campus’s capacity for carbon storage and sequestration, air pollutant removal, and stormwater runoff mitigation. The campus green infrastructure, comprising 1887 trees across 32 species with a density of 145.5 stems per hectare, demonstrated significant ecological value. Results show a carbon storage density of 26.61 t C ha −1 and an annual gross carbon sequestration of 11.43 tons. Furthermore, the campus trees removed 1213.7 kg of air pollutants annually (a deposition rate of 9.35 g m −2 ), with ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide showing the highest deposition. The campus also retained 956.1 m 3 of stormwater annually. These findings, particularly the high carbon sequestration rates, are attributed to the dominance of relatively young, fast-growing tree species. This research establishes a critical baseline for understanding urban ecosystem services in a previously under-researched geographical context. The detailed, empirical data offers crucial insights for urban planners and policymakers in Nizhny Novgorod and beyond, advocating for the strategic integration of ecosystem services assessments into campus planning and broader urban green infrastructure development across Russian cities. The study underscores the significant role of university campuses as vital components of urban green infrastructure, contributing substantially to environmental sustainability and human well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Basil N. Yakimov & Nataly I. Zaznobina & Irina M. Kuznetsova & Angela D. Bolshakova & Taisia A. Kovaleva & Ivan N. Markelov & Vladislav V. Onishchenko, 2025. "University Campuses as Vital Urban Green Infrastructure: Quantifying Ecosystem Services Based on Field Inventory in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2073-:d:1773450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2073/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2073/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem Services: New Findings for Landscape Architects, Urban Planners, and Policymakers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, January.
    2. Schäffler, Alexis & Swilling, Mark, 2013. "Valuing green infrastructure in an urban environment under pressure — The Johannesburg case," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 246-257.
    3. Oxana Klimanova & Olga Illarionova & Karsten Grunewald & Elena Bukvareva, 2021. "Green Infrastructure, Urbanization, and Ecosystem Services: The Main Challenges for Russia’s Largest Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Bagdon, Benjamin A. & Huang, Ching-Hsun & Dewhurst, Stephen, 2016. "Managing for ecosystem services in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests using a novel simulation-to-optimization methodology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 324(C), pages 11-27.
    5. Charl De Villiers & Sile Chen & Chenxing jin & Yiner Zhu, 2014. "Carbon sequestered in the trees on a university campus: a case study," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 149-171, May.
    6. Langemeyer, Johannes & Baró, Francesc & Roebeling, Peter & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, 2015. "Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: The case of park Montjuïc in Barcelona," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 178-186.
    7. Francesco Ferrini & Alessio Fini & Jacopo Mori & Antonella Gori, 2020. "Role of Vegetation as a Mitigating Factor in the Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Boya Wang & Zhicheng Liu & Yuting Mei & Wenjie Li, 2019. "Assessment of Ecosystem Service Quality and Its Correlation with Landscape Patterns in Haidian District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-34, April.
    9. William Villegas-Ch & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2019. "Application of a Smart City Model to a Traditional University Campus with a Big Data Architecture: A Sustainable Smart Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Charl De Villiers & Sile Chen & Chenxing jin & Yiner Zhu, 2014. "Carbon sequestered in the trees on a university campus: a case study," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 149-171, May.
    11. Endreny, T. & Santagata, R. & Perna, A. & Stefano, C. De & Rallo, R.F. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "Implementing and managing urban forests: A much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 328-335.
    12. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem Services: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-4, August.
    13. Susmita Dasgupta & Asvani Gosain & Sandhya Rao & Subhendu Roy & Maria Sarraf, 2013. "A megacity in a changing climate: the case of Kolkata," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 747-766, February.
    14. Andersson, Erik & McPhearson, Timon & Kremer, Peleg & Gomez-Baggethun, Erik & Haase, Dagmar & Tuvendal, Magnus & Wurster, Daniel, 2015. "Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 157-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2023. "Urban Ecosystem Services: Advancements in Urban Green Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-4, February.
    2. Dennis, Matthew & James, Philip, 2017. "Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: Exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 17-26.
    3. Kiswanto Kiswanto & Ain Hajawiyah & Atta Putra Harjanto & Endah Tri Setyarini, 2023. "Twelve Years Research Journey of Carbon Accounting," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 246-254, July.
    4. Kevin Nabor Paredes-Canencio & Ana Lasso & Rosaura Castrillon & Juan R. Vidal-Medina & Enrique C. Quispe, 2024. "Carbon footprint of higher education institutions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30239-30272, December.
    5. Maria Elena Menconi & Ambra Sipone & David Grohmann, 2021. "Complex Systems Thinking Approach to Urban Greenery to Provide Community-Tailored Solutions and Enhance the Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Giulio Senes & Chiara Parretta & Natalia Fumagalli & Patrizia Tassinari & Daniele Torreggiani, 2023. "Soft Mobility Network for the Enhancement and Discovery of the Rural Landscape: Definition of a Masterplan for Alto Ferrarese (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Ayad Ghany Ismaeel & Jereesha Mary & Anitha Chelliah & Jaganathan Logeshwaran & Sarmad Nozad Mahmood & Sameer Alani & Akram H. Shather, 2023. "Enhancing Traffic Intelligence in Smart Cities Using Sustainable Deep Radial Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Winifred U. Anake & Faith O. Bayode & Hassana O. Jonathan & Conrad A. Omonhinmin & Oluwole A. Odetunmibi & Timothy A. Anake, 2022. "Screening of Plant Species Response and Performance for Green Belt Development: Implications for Semi-Urban Ecosystem Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Liu, Mingxing & Luo, Qiaoling & Huang, Rongjun & Wu, Yangyi & Zhou, Junfang, 2025. "Dynamic impacts of urban expansion on vegetation growth in urban environments: A sustainable land management framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Sanja Gašparović & Ana Sopina & Anton Zeneral, 2022. "Impacts of Zagreb’s Urban Development on Dynamic Changes in Stream Landscapes from Mid-Twentieth Century," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Rudl Ales & Machar Ivo & Uradnicek Lubos & Praus Ludek & Pechanec Vilem, 2019. "Young urban trees as important structures in the cultural heritage of cities – a case study from Prague," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 14-23, September.
    14. Sirakaya, Aysegül & Cliquet, An & Harris, Jim, 2018. "Ecosystem services in cities: Towards the international legal protection of ecosystem services in urban environments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 205-212.
    15. Laura Calvet-Mir & Hug March & Daniel Corbacho-Monné & Erik Gómez-Baggethun & Victoria Reyes-García, 2016. "Home Garden Ecosystem Services Valuation through a Gender Lens: A Case Study in the Catalan Pyrenees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Donatella Valente & María Victoria Marinelli & Erica Maria Lovello & Cosimo Gaspare Giannuzzi & Irene Petrosillo, 2022. "Fostering the Resiliency of Urban Landscape through the Sustainable Spatial Planning of Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Alexandra Titz & Sosten S. Chiotha, 2019. "Pathways for Sustainable and Inclusive Cities in Southern and Eastern Africa through Urban Green Infrastructure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    18. Riechers, Maraja & Barkmann, Jan & Tscharntke, Teja, 2016. "Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 33-39.
    19. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Musioł-Urbańczyk, Anna & Podgórska, Marzena & Wolny, Maciej, 2021. "Does motivation matter in evaluation of research institutions? Evidence from Polish public universities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. Yu Li & Ji Zheng & Fei Li & Xueting Jin & Chen Xu, 2017. "Assessment of municipal infrastructure development and its critical influencing factors in urban China: A FA and STIRPAT approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2073-:d:1773450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.