IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p935-d1423680.html

Habitat Protection in Urban–Rural Fringes through Coordinated Ecological Network Construction and Territorial Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Yuting Xie

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiaxin Ying

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jie Zou

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Ruohao Li

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Haoxun Zhang

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Qie Shi

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yonghua Li

    (Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Zhejiang University Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Urban–rural fringes (URFs) are crucial for biodiversity yet often neglected in conservation efforts. This study refines URF habitat evaluation and integrates it into a coordinated ecological network (EN) and territorial planning framework. Using Qingpu District, Shanghai as a case study, we defined its URF via k-means clustering of night-time light data and applied the InVEST model, MSPA, Integrated Habitat Value, Patch Importance, and Betweenness Centrality analyses to identify high-value URF habitats. Furthermore, we constructed the EN using circuit theory and evaluated the impact of URF sources on network connectivity and construction costs. Our findings reveal that integrating URF sources increased connectivity indices significantly ( α by 127.18%, β by 47.00%, and γ by 33.4%) and decreased construction costs ( CR index by 0.07). Despite these benefits, under China’s “Three Zones and Three Lines” policy, 78.18% of Qingpu’s URF sources remain unprotected, with 56.78% at risk of conversion to construction land. Our study proposes a comprehensive evaluation system for URF habitats and strategic recommendations for their incorporation into regional ENs, thus informing policy making and planning for more inclusive ecological conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuting Xie & Jiaxin Ying & Jie Zou & Ruohao Li & Haoxun Zhang & Qie Shi & Yonghua Li, 2024. "Habitat Protection in Urban–Rural Fringes through Coordinated Ecological Network Construction and Territorial Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:935-:d:1423680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/935/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/935/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. María F. Schmitz & Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Patricio Sarmiento-Mateos, 2021. "High Nature Value Farming Systems and Protected Areas: Conservation Opportunities or Land Abandonment? A Study Case in the Madrid Region (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Jing Zhang & Yan Chen & Congmou Zhu & Bingbing Huang & Muye Gan, 2021. "Identification of Potential Land-Use Conflicts between Agricultural and Ecological Space in an Ecologically Fragile Area of Southeastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Ma, Wenqiu & Jiang, Guanghui & Chen, Yunhao & Qu, Yanbo & Zhou, Tao & Li, Wenqing, 2020. "How feasible is regional integration for reconciling land use conflicts across the urban–rural interface? Evidence from Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan region in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Bo-Xun Huang & Shang-Chia Chiou & Wen-Ying Li, 2021. "Landscape Pattern and Ecological Network Structure in Urban Green Space Planning: A Case Study of Fuzhou City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Bodin, Örjan & Saura, Santiago, 2010. "Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2393-2405.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanru Zhao & Xiaomin Zhao & Xinyi Huang & Jiaxin Guo & Guohui Chen, 2022. "Identifying a Period of Spatial Land Use Conflicts and Their Driving Forces in the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Meizhe Liao & Zongwen Zhang & Ruirui Yan & Keyu Bai, 2024. "The Assessment of Biodiversity Changes and Sustainable Agricultural Development in The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Guanglong Dong & Zhonghao Liu & Yuanzhao Niu & Wenya Jiang, 2022. "Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Shandong Province from an Ecological Security Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Raihan Jamil & Jason P. Julian & Jennifer L. R. Jensen & Kimberly M. Meitzen, 2024. "Urban Green Infrastructure Connectivity: The Role of Private Semi-Natural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Jiao Chen & Liwei Zhang & Shan Zhao & Hua Zong, 2023. "Assessing Land-Use Conflict Potential and Its Correlation with LULC Based on the Perspective of Multi-Functionality and Landscape Complexity: The Case of Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Zhigang Li & Jie Yang & Jialong Zhong & Dong Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Agglomeration Ecological Sustainability and Identification of Influencing Factors: Based on the 3DEF Model and the Random Forest," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Zhen Wang & Xupeng Zhang & Chaozheng Zhang & Qing Yang, 2022. "How Regional Integration Affects Urban Green Development Efficiency: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Danning Chen & Weifeng Chen & Xincun Zhu & Shugang Xie & Peiyu Du & Xiaolong Chen & Dong Lv, 2025. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Restoration Strategy of Ecological Security Pattern in the Yellow River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Ling Xie & Hongwei Wang & Suhong Liu, 2022. "Simulating the spatiotemporal variations of oasis rural settlements in the upper reaches of rivers of arid regions in Xinjiang, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Roy, Arijit & Bhattacharya, Sudeepto & Ramprakash, M. & Senthil Kumar, A., 2016. "Modelling critical patches of connectivity for invasive Maling bamboo (Yushania maling) in Darjeeling Himalayas using graph theoretic approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 329(C), pages 77-85.
    13. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Peiheng Yu & Yan Zhang & Mingqing Han & Esther H. K. Yung & Edwin H. W. Chan & Yiyun Chen, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity Impacts of Urbanisation on Open Space Fragmentation in Hong Kong’s Built-Up Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Zhenzhen Yuan & Weijie Li & Yong Wang & Dayun Zhu & Qiuhong Wang & Yan Liu & Lingyan Zhou, 2022. "Ecosystem Health Evaluation and Ecological Security Patterns Construction Based on VORSD and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Issa Kaduyu & Godiraone Yuyi & Ednah Kgosiesele, 2024. "Identification of Areas for Sustainable Settlements in Highly Conflicted Protected Areas Using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst: A Case of Chobe District, Botswana," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(5), pages 1-84, July.
    17. Zhang Zhang & Huimin Zhou & Shuxian Li & Zhibin Zhao & Junbo Xu & Yuansuo Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Land Use Efficiency in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, April.
    18. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Rong Guo & Tong Wu & Mengran Liu & Mengshi Huang & Luigi Stendardo & Yutong Zhang, 2019. "The Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in the Harbin-Changchun Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Xinyan Zou & Chen Wang & Xiang Que & Xiaogang Ma & Zhe Wang & Quanli Fu & Yuting Lai & Xinhan Zhuang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneous Responses of Ecosystem Services to Landscape Patterns in Urban–Suburban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:935-:d:1423680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.