IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i2p223-d1337266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Moran

    (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Jacob A. Jordaan

    (Utrecht University School of Economics, Utrecht University, Kriekenpitplein 21-22, 3584 EC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Phil I. Jones

    (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

Abstract

A growing body of scholarship draws attention to prisons and environmental justice, pointing out the propensity for prisons to be located on contaminated sites and to be in close proximity to polluting industries, as well as for prisons themselves to contribute to local environmental degradation. Prisoners’ immobility renders them unable to relocate away from harmful environments, and there are now numerous suggestions that their wellbeing suffers as a result of the poor quality of many local environments. However, since a relationship between environmental quality and prisoner wellbeing is yet to be robustly demonstrated, there is currently no firm evidence base from which to argue for positive change. This paper therefore examines the effect of the environmental quality of the locations of prisons, approximated as the presence of greenspace in the immediate vicinity of prisons, local species biodiversity and local levels of air and noise pollution, on wellbeing outcomes in a set of prisons in England and Wales. It finds that good environmental quality, in the form of high biodiversity and/or low air pollution, enhances the already-recognized positive effects of greenspace on the wellbeing of incarcerated populations. On the basis of these findings, this paper makes evidence-based policy recommendations intended to enhance the wellbeing of incarcerated populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Moran & Jacob A. Jordaan & Phil I. Jones, 2024. "Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:223-:d:1337266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/223/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/223/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toman, Elisa L. & Cochran, Joshua C. & Cochran, John K. & Bales, William D., 2015. "The implications of sentence length for inmate adjustment to prison life," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 510-521.
    2. Meyers, Travis J. & Wright, Kevin A. & Young, Jacob T.N. & Tasca, Melinda, 2017. "Social support from outside the walls: Examining the role of relationship dynamics among inmates and visitors," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 57-67.
    3. Alexander Smith & Adegboyega Ogunwale & Michael Liebrenz, 2022. "The tip of the iceberg? Climate change, detention settings and mental health," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(7), pages 1303-1306, November.
    4. Eric Vaz & Richard Ross Shaker & Michael D. Cusimano & Luis Loures & Jamal Jokar Arsanjani, 2020. "Does Land Use and Landscape Contribute to Self-Harm? A Sustainability Cities Framework," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junvil A. Insong & Jose F. Cuevas Jr., 2021. "Ways of coping of prisoners' spouses: a structural equation model," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 17(1), pages 486-500, March.
    2. Rydberg, Jason & Clark, Kyleigh, 2016. "Variation in the incarceration length-recidivism dose–response relationship," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 118-128.
    3. Berghuis, Maria & Nieuwbeerta, Paul & Palmen, Hanneke & Sentse, Miranda & van Hazebroek, Babette & van Ginneken, Esther, 2022. "Visitation patterns and post-release offending: Exploring variations in the timing, rate, and consistency of prison visits," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Fahmy, Chantal, 2021. "First weeks out: Social support stability and health among formerly incarcerated men," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Wang, Ying-Wei & Yeh, Hsin-Jang, 2021. "An evaluation model for the development of more humane correctional institutions: Evidence from Penghu Prison," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. repec:thr:techub:10017:y:2021:i:1:p:486-500 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:223-:d:1337266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.