IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2023i1p16-d1303990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformation of Buildings and Urban Spaces to Adapt for Future Mobility: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Jun Park

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Ju-Hyung Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Min-Jung Maing

    (School of Architecture, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Jin-Ho Ahn

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Yang-Gil Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Nam-Hyuk Ham

    (Department of Urban Infra System Engineering, Hanyang Cyber University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Jae-Jun Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The development of smart cities has led to transforming modern city operations by applying emerging technologies from the fourth industrial revolution such as the Internet of Things, BIM and machine learning. To prepare for the future development of cities, it is necessary to investigate the current status of city development, research topics and the direction toward future cities. In this study, a systematic literature review was conducted following the combination of literature review guides by Kitchenham and the PRISMA statement. The review identified 141 peer-reviewed academic papers from web-based archives, such as Web of Science and SCOPUS, that were categorized into five topics related to smart cities and urban areas. The technologies applied in the research were analyzed to determine the direction future cities should take based on current smart cities and emerging technologies that will shape individuals’ daily lives. However, it was discovered that research papers on critical areas, such as mobility and management, were lacking compared to those on building design and urban planning. This paper concludes with an example of a future urban area that has been transformed due to adoption of future mobility technology to address the shortcomings of the reviewed literature on building and urban environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Jun Park & Ju-Hyung Kim & Min-Jung Maing & Jin-Ho Ahn & Yang-Gil Kim & Nam-Hyuk Ham & Jae-Jun Kim, 2023. "Transformation of Buildings and Urban Spaces to Adapt for Future Mobility: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:16-:d:1303990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffen Andreas Schüle & Sarah Nanninga & Stefanie Dreger & Gabriele Bolte, 2018. "Relations between Objective and Perceived Built Environments and the Modifying Role of Individual Socioeconomic Position. A Cross-Sectional Study on Traffic Noise and Urban Green Space in a Large Germ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Vincent Augiseau & Eunhye Kim, 2021. "Inflows and Outflows from Material Stocks of Buildings and Networks and their Space-Differentiated Drivers: The Case Study of the Paris Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa & Colomer-Llinàs, Joan & Meléndez-Frigola, Joaquim, 2015. "Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 611-622.
    4. Dahlen Silva & Dávid Földes & Csaba Csiszár, 2021. "Autonomous Vehicle Use and Urban Space Transformation: A Scenario Building and Analysing Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Sotiris Zygiaris, 2013. "Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(2), pages 217-231, June.
    6. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    7. Isabelle Soares & Gerd Weitkamp & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Public Spaces as Knowledgescapes: Understanding the Relationship between the Built Environment and Creative Encounters at Dutch University Campuses and Science Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.
    8. Fang Zhao & Catherine Prentice & Joseph Wallis & Arvind Patel & Marie-France Waxin, 2020. "An integrative study of the implications of the rise of coworking spaces in smart cities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 467-486, December.
    9. Panupant Phapant & Abhishek Dutta & Orathai Chavalparit, 2021. "COVID-19 Experience Transforming the Protective Environment of Office Buildings and Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Lazaroiu, George Cristian & Roscia, Mariacristina, 2012. "Definition methodology for the smart cities model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 326-332.
    11. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    12. Liviu Gabriel CRETU, 2012. "Smart Cities Design using Event-driven Paradigm and Semantic Web," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(4), pages 57-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Csukás Máté Szilárd & Roland Z. Szabó, 2018. "Factors Hindering Smart City Developments in Medium-Sized Cities," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 14(01), pages 3-14.
    2. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak, 2022. "Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Guido Perboli & Mariangela Rosano, 2020. "A Taxonomic Analysis of Smart City Projects in North America and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Koutra, Sesil & Becue, Vincent & Ioakimidis, Christos S., 2019. "Searching for the ‘smart’ definition through its spatial approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 924-936.
    7. Justyna Żywiołek & Francesco Schiavone, 2021. "Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Kyunghun Min & Moonyoung Yoon & Katsunori Furuya, 2019. "A Comparison of a Smart City’s Trends in Urban Planning before and after 2016 through Keyword Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Parul Gupta & Sumedha Chauhan & M. P. Jaiswal, 2019. "Classification of Smart City Research - a Descriptive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 661-685, June.
    10. Schiavone, Francesco & Paolone, Francesco & Mancini, Daniela, 2019. "Business model innovation for urban smartization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 210-219.
    11. Marchesani, Filippo & Masciarelli, Francesca & Bikfalvi, Andrea, 2023. "Smart city as a hub for talent and innovative companies: Exploring the (dis) advantages of digital technology implementation in cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Tara Vanli, 2024. "Ranking of Global Smart Cities Using Dynamic Factor Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 405-437, January.
    13. Oleg Dashkevych & Boris A. Portnov, 2022. "Criteria for Smart City Identification: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-34, April.
    14. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-69.
    15. Robert Romanowski & Marcin Lewicki, 2018. "Internet rzeczy w koncepcji Smart City," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 49, pages 97-112.
    16. Nammi Kim & Seungwoo Yang, 2021. "Characteristics of Conceptually Related Smart Cities (CRSCs) Services from the Perspective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-48, March.
    17. Dubravka Jurlina Alibegovic & Zeljka Kordej-De Villa & Mislav Sagovac, 2018. "Smart City Indicators: Can They Improve Governance in Croatian Large Cities?," Working Papers 1805, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    18. Appio, Francesco Paolo & Lima, Marcos & Paroutis, Sotirios, 2019. "Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Nripendra P. Rana & Sunil Luthra & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Rubina Islam & Sian Roderick & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2019. "Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 503-525, June.
    20. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhou, Tao & Wang, Di, 2020. "Tracking the evolution processes of smart cities in China by assessing performance and efficiency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:16-:d:1303990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.