IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1636-d1221144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Evaluation Elements of Urban Agricultural Green Bases: A Causal Inference-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yuchong Long

    (College of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Street, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zhengwei Cao

    (College of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Street, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yan Mao

    (Institute for Public Policy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xinran Liu

    (College of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Street, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yan Gao

    (College of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Street, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Chuanzhi Zhou

    (College of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Street, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Xin Zheng

    (College of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Street, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

The construction of agricultural green bases is an important part of sustainable agricultural development. This paper takes urban agriculture green bases in Shanghai as an example, choosing base construction elements, production, and ecological construction elements, as well as status assessment elements as evaluation indicators, in order to construct an evaluation system for urban agriculture green bases. Using a Bayesian network, typical urban agricultural green bases in six agricultural districts of Shanghai were evaluated. The construction of the evaluation system was analyzed by using intervention, counterfactual inference, and other methods to analyze the correlation and importance of the indicators. The results show that there are differences among the bases in various indicators, but they all reach a high level overall; base construction elements as well as production and ecological construction elements are the main factors affecting the level of urban agricultural green bases; improving the base management system (BMS), innovativeness (IN), and economic benefits (EBs) are key ways to improve the production capacity of agriculture green bases. Green base construction should pay attention to top-level design, coordinate the planning of industrial layout, technical mode, scientific and technological support, and supporting policies. Based on the conclusion, this paper provides some useful recommendations for creating urban agriculture green bases, which help promote urban agriculture transformation, upgrading, and coordinating development between urban and rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuchong Long & Zhengwei Cao & Yan Mao & Xinran Liu & Yan Gao & Chuanzhi Zhou & Xin Zheng, 2023. "Research on Evaluation Elements of Urban Agricultural Green Bases: A Causal Inference-Based Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1636-:d:1221144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2018. "Revisiting the Sustainability Concept of Urban Food Production from a Stakeholders’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Kathrin Specht & Rosemarie Siebert & Ina Hartmann & Ulf Freisinger & Magdalena Sawicka & Armin Werner & Susanne Thomaier & Dietrich Henckel & Heike Walk & Axel Dierich, 2014. "Urban agriculture of the future: an overview of sustainability aspects of food production in and on buildings," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(1), pages 33-51, March.
    3. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Kathrin Specht & Erofili Grapsa & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2019. "How Can Innovation in Urban Agriculture Contribute to Sustainability? A Characterization and Evaluation Study from Five Western European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-31, August.
    4. Monther M. Tahat & Kholoud M. Alananbeh & Yahia A. Othman & Daniel I. Leskovar, 2020. "Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Brionna Colson-Fearon & H. Shellae Versey, 2022. "Urban Agriculture as a Means to Food Sovereignty? A Case Study of Baltimore City Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Graham Parkes & Rebekah O’Rourke & Tiago Domingos & Ricardo F. M. Teixeira, 2023. "An Experimental Portuguese Social-Enterprise Project in Urban Agriculture: A Case Study on the Influence of the Interaction of Stakeholder Roles on Sustainable Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Anusha Ghimire & Sunil Ojha & Srijana Saud & Sanju Aryal & Anjali Thapa & Prabina Bhandari, 2024. "The Imperative Role Of Urban Horticulture In Future Sustainability: A Review," INWASCON Technology Magazine(i-TECH MAG), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 48-56, May.
    3. Paola Clerino & Agnès Fargue-Lelièvre, 2020. "Formalizing Objectives and Criteria for Urban Agriculture Sustainability with a Participatory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Ngetleh Ngesang & Marietta Yilen, 2025. "Perceived Benefits and Cost-Benefit Perspectives on Service Digitalization: A Preliminary Study among Fine Dining Restaurants in Bukit Jalil and Bukit Bintang, Kuala Lumpur [The Effect of Innovativ," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 2017-2026, April.
    5. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Kathrin Specht & Erofili Grapsa & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2019. "How Can Innovation in Urban Agriculture Contribute to Sustainability? A Characterization and Evaluation Study from Five Western European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-31, August.
    6. Giuseppina Pennisi & Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Francesco Orsini & Andrea Crepaldi & Silvana Nicola & Jesús Ochoa & Juan A. Fernandez & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2019. "Modelling Environmental Burdens of Indoor-Grown Vegetables and Herbs as Affected by Red and Blue LED Lighting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Leena Erälinna & Barbara Szymoniuk, 2021. "Managing a Circular Food System in Sustainable Urban Farming. Experimental Research at the Turku University Campus (Finland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Devi Buehler & Ranka Junge, 2016. "Global Trends and Current Status of Commercial Urban Rooftop Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Michael Martin & Elvira Molin, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of an Urban Vertical Hydroponic Farming System in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Alexandra Doernberg & Annette Piorr & Ingo Zasada & Dirk Wascher & Ulrich Schmutz, 2022. "Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 885-904, September.
    11. Nicole Meinusch & Susanne Kramer & Oliver Körner & Jürgen Wiese & Ingolf Seick & Anita Beblek & Regine Berges & Bernhard Illenberger & Marco Illenberger & Jennifer Uebbing & Maximilian Wolf & Gunter S, 2021. "Integrated Cycles for Urban Biomass as a Strategy to Promote a CO 2 -Neutral Society—A Feasibility Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Prem Chandra Pandey & Manish Pandey, 2023. "Highlighting the role of agriculture and geospatial technology in food security and sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3175-3195, October.
    13. Jeroen Degerickx & Martin Hermy & Ben Somers, 2020. "Mapping Functional Urban Green Types Using High Resolution Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-35, March.
    14. Ana M. Bartolome & Deiyalí A. Carpio & Beatriz Urbano, 2022. "Urban Agriculture Digital Planning for the European Union’s Green Deal," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 159-159.
    15. Garrett M. Broad & Wythe Marschall & Maya Ezzeddine, 2022. "Perceptions of high-tech controlled environment agriculture among local food consumers: using interviews to explore sense-making and connections to good food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 417-433, March.
    16. Vahidi, Milad & Shafian, Sanaz & Frame, William Hunter, 2025. "Depth-specific soil moisture estimation in vegetated corn fields using a canopy-informed model: A fusion of RGB-thermal drone data and machine learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    17. Miraç Kılıç & Recep Gündoğan & Hikmet Günal, 2024. "An illustration of a sustainable agricultural land suitability assessment system with a land degradation sensitivity," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6085-6107, March.
    18. Antoni F. Tulla & Ana Vera, 2019. "Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Xuepeng Shi & Chengfei Shi & Abel Tablada & Xiaoyu Guan & Mingfeng Cui & Yangxiao Rong & Qiqi Zhang & Xudong Xie, 2025. "A Review of Research Progress in Vertical Farming on Façades: Design, Technology, and Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-46, January.
    20. Shan, He & Poredoš, Primož & Zou, Hao & Lv, Haotian & Wang, Ruzhu, 2023. "Perspectives for urban microenvironment sustainability enabled by decentralized water-energy-food harvesting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1636-:d:1221144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.