IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p999-d1138232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Landscape Analysis Using Earth-Observation Data: An Example from Chania, Crete, Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Jridi

    (Department of Geoinformation in Environmental Management, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, 73100 Crete, Greece)

  • Chariton Kalaitzidis

    (Department of Geoinformation in Environmental Management, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, 73100 Crete, Greece)

  • Dimitrios D. Alexakis

    (GeoSat ReSeArch Lab, Institute for Mediterranean Studies, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH) Rethimno, 74100 Crete, Greece)

Abstract

Pursuing sustainability in a challenging world and under the influence of numerous natural and anthropogenic drivers of change presents one of the major global concerns. The transition towards a more sustainable development requires a harmonious balance between human well-being and environmental management. The concept of landscape is at the core of such a process. Hence, evaluating the different aspects of the landscape and their components is crucial for policy making, planning and management. In fact, landscape quality assessment has become a special focus of interest, especially with the directives of the European Landscape Convention. This research work aims to analyze the rural landscape of the Chania prefecture, West Crete, Greece, taking into account its multifold dimensions. The analysis was carried out using a series of quantitative spatial indicators. Consecutively, structural (mean patch area, contagion index, edge density and percentage of landscape occupied by a class of the highest share), ecological (density of ecological barriers, Modified Shannon diversity index), visual (share of positive land-cover forms, share of negative land-cover forms, form and color disharmony index, shape disharmony index) and cultural indices (historical monuments index) were estimated and analyzed in a GIS environment. The overall methodology incorporated different land-use/land-cover data (multitemporal Corine data and land use derived from the classification of Earth-observation (EO) data). The historical and current analysis of the landscape within Chania revealed quite high structural and visual values. The ecological dimension is rather stable, with a potential decrease by the year 2045. Additionally, the structural dimension seemed to be sensitive to the spatial resolution of the data source. The spatial extent, at which the landscape is evaluated, seemed to impact the landscape’s ecological, visual and cultural values.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Jridi & Chariton Kalaitzidis & Dimitrios D. Alexakis, 2023. "Quantitative Landscape Analysis Using Earth-Observation Data: An Example from Chania, Crete, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:999-:d:1138232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theano S. Terkenli & Tryfon Daras & Efpraxia-Aithra Maria, 2019. "Landscape Notions among Greek Engineering Students: Exploring Landscape Perceptions, Knowledge and Participation," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Swetnam, Ruth D. & Tweed, Fiona S., 2018. "A tale of two landscapes: Transferring landscape quality metrics from Wales to Iceland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 565-576.
    3. Kienast, Felix & Frick, Jacqueline & van Strien, Maarten J. & Hunziker, Marcel, 2015. "The Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program – A comprehensive indicator set to measure landscape change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 136-150.
    4. B. Ramos & I. Pastor, 2012. "Mapping the visual landscape quality in Europe using physical attributes," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 56-61.
    5. Katia Talento & Miguel Amado & Josè Carlos Kullberg, 2019. "Landscape—A Review with a European Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolaos Sifakis & Tryfon Daras & Theocharis Tsoutsos, 2020. "How Much Energy Efficient are Renewable Energy Sources Cooperatives’ Initiatives?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2020. "The Methodology of Landscape Quality (LQ) Indicators Analysis Based on Remote Sensing Data: Polish National Parks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. HarmÃ¡Ä ková, Zuzana V. & VaÄ kář, David, 2018. "Future uncertainty in scenarios of ecosystem services provision: Linking differences among narratives and outcomes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PB), pages 134-145.
    5. Kienast, Felix & Huber, Nica & Hergert, Rico & Bolliger, Janine & Moran, Lorena Segura & Hersperger, Anna M., 2017. "Conflicts between decentralized renewable electricity production and landscape services – A spatially-explicit quantitative assessment for Switzerland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 397-407.
    6. Piotr Krajewski, 2019. "Monitoring of Landscape Transformations within Landscape Parks in Poland in the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Andrew Lothian, 2022. "Visual Resource Stewardship—An International Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, March.
    8. Theano S. Terkenli & Ewa Skowronek & Vasiliki Georgoula, 2021. "Landscape and Tourism: European Expert Views on an Intricate Relationship," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Vassiliki Vlami & Jan Danek & Stamatis Zogaris & Eirini Gallou & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2020. "Residents’ Views on Landscape and Ecosystem Services during a Wind Farm Proposal in an Island Protected Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Simona R. Grădinaru & Cristian Ioan Iojă & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Anna M. Hersperger, 2017. "Are Spatial Planning Objectives Reflected in the Evolution of Urban Landscape Patterns? A Framework for the Evaluation of Spatial Planning Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Ionuț-Alexandru Spânu & Alexandru Ozunu & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2022. "A Comparative View of Agri-Environmental Indicators and Stakeholders’ Assessment of Their Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Grete Stokstad & Wendy Fjellstad, 2019. "Experiences from a National Landscape Monitoring Programme—Maintaining Continuity Whilst Meeting Changing Demands and Opportunities," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Roula Aad & Nabil Nemer, 2023. "Developing a Tool for Landscape Sustainability Assessment—Using a New Conceptual Approach in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Jose Ramon Saura & Ana Reyes-Menendez & Cesar Alvarez-Alonso, 2018. "Do Online Comments Affect Environmental Management? Identifying Factors Related to Environmental Management and Sustainability of Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Syed Amir Manzoor & Geoffrey Griffiths & David Christian Rose & Martin Lukac, 2021. "The Return of Wooded Landscapes in Wales: An Exploration of Possible Post-Brexit Futures," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Dongwoo Lee & Kyushik Oh, 2019. "The Green Infrastructure Assessment System (GIAS) and Its Applications for Urban Development and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Sebastian Eiter & Wendy Fjellstad & Oskar Puschmann & Svein Olav Krøgli, 2019. "Long-Term Monitoring of Protected Cultural Heritage Environments in Norway: Development of Methods and First-Time Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Belén Martín & Rosa Arce & Isabel Otero & Manuel Loro, 2018. "Visual Landscape Quality as Viewed from Motorways in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Egli, Thomas & Bolliger, Janine & Kienast, Felix, 2017. "Evaluating ecosystem service trade-offs with wind electricity production in Switzerland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 863-875.
    20. Katia Talento & Miguel Amado & José Carlos Kullberg, 2020. "Quarries: From Abandoned to Renewed Places," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:999-:d:1138232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.