IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i1p226-d1031918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Green Spaces More Available and Accessible to Green Building Users? A Comparative Study in Texas

Author

Listed:
  • Senhong Cai

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Zhonghua Gou

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Green buildings (GBs) and green spaces (GSs) play a key foundational role as important drivers of urban Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There have been many studies on the spatial distribution of GBs and GSs, but relevant studies exploring the spatial relationship between GBs and GSs are lacking. The research questions were: whether GBs are more likely to access GSs than nongreen buildings (NGBs) and whether GBs with higher certification levels are more likely to access GSs. In this study, we used Texas and its four major cities (Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio) as case studies to compare the availability and accessibility of GSs to GBs (certified by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, LEED by U.S. Green Building Council) and NGBs. The study was conducted using spatial analysis tools in a geographic information system (GIS) to explore the spatial distribution of GBs and quantify the availability and accessibility of GSs in a comparison of GBs and NGBs and different GB certification levels. The study found that GBs in each city showed uneven distribution with multicore distribution. In addition, the availability and accessibility of GSs for GBs are lower than for NGBs, and the ability to obtain GSs does not increase with higher GB certification levels. This is because many GBs are located in areas far from the city center or in small cities around large cities where there are few GSs available, resulting in a mismatch in the distribution of GBs and GSs. The study also reviewed the certification manuals and found that LEED has regulated GSs at the city and community levels, yet has ignored them at the building level, and thus further suggests specific improvements. This study provides references and suggestions for adding GSs to the certification content, helping policymakers to optimize future efforts to improve GB certification programs and contributing to the eventual greater role of GBs and GSs together in urban SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Senhong Cai & Zhonghua Gou, 2023. "Are Green Spaces More Available and Accessible to Green Building Users? A Comparative Study in Texas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:226-:d:1031918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/226/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/226/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine Madson & Bryan Franz & Robert Leicht & Jonathan Nelson, 2022. "Evaluating the Sustainability of New Construction Projects over Time by Examining the Evolution of the LEED Rating System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Yinqi Zhang & He Wang & Weijun Gao & Fan Wang & Nan Zhou & Daniel M. Kammen & Xiaoyu Ying, 2019. "A Survey of the Status and Challenges of Green Building Development in Various Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-29, September.
    3. Emilio Ramírez-Juidías & José-Lázaro Amaro-Mellado & Jorge Luis Leiva-Piedra, 2022. "Influence of the Urban Green Spaces of Seville (Spain) on Housing Prices through the Hedonic Assessment Methodology and Geospatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Li, Shengxiao(Alex) & Zhai, Wei & Jiao, Junfeng & Wang, Chao (Kenneth), 2022. "Who loses and who wins in the ride-hailing era? A case study of Austin, Texas," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 130-138.
    5. Siwei Chen & Zhonghua Gou, 2022. "An Investigation of Green Roof Spatial Distribution and Incentive Policies Using Green Buildings as a Benchmark," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Yi Gao & Gaosheng Yang & Qiuhao Xie, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Green Building Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Amal Shamseldin & Ashraf Balabel & Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Ahmed Abdelhafiz & Usama Issa & Ibrahim Sharaky & Mohamed Al-Surf & Mosleh Al-Harthi, 2020. "Adjustment of the Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment Field for Taif City-Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "An agent-based evolutionary system model of the transformation from building material industry (BMI) to green intelligent BMI under supply chain management," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Minerva Bonilla & William Rasdorf, 2023. "Identification of Construction Inhibitors and Sustainable Construction Practices for Alternative Intersections and Interchanges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Marlena Piekut, 2024. "Housing conditions in European one-person households," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Chen, Long & Huang, Jiahui & Jing, Peng & Wang, Bichen & Yu, Xiaozhou & Zha, Ye & Jiang, Chengxi, 2023. "Changing or unchanging Chinese attitudes toward ride-hailing? A social media analytics perspective from 2018 to 2021," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Saxena, Aditya & Gupta, Vallary, 2023. "Carpooling: Who is closest to adopting it? An investigation into the potential car-poolers among private vehicle users: A case of a developing country, India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 11-20.
    8. Meng, Si'an & Brown, Anne & Barajas, Jesus M., 2024. "Complements or competitors? Equity implications of taxis and ride-hail use in Chicago," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Danbei Mo & Liang Huang & Linghong Zeng, 2023. "Green Development Level Evaluation of Urban Engineering Construction in the Mid-Low Reaches of Yangtze River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Tian, Guang & Ewing, Reid & Li, Han, 2023. "Exploring the influences of ride-hailing services on VMT and transit usage – Evidence from California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. Dan Yu & Bart Dewancker & Fanyue Qian, 2020. "The Identification and Rebound Effect Evaluation of Equipment Energy Efficiency Improvement Policy: A Case Study on Japan’s Top Runner Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Ng, Wai Lam & Chin, Min Yee & Zhou, Jinqin & Woon, Kok Sin & Ching, Ann Ying, 2022. "The overlooked criteria in green building certification system: Embodied energy and thermal insulation on non-residential building with a case study in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Andrew Ikingura & Anna M. Grabiec & Bartosz Radomski, 2025. "Examining Key Barriers and Relevant Promotion Strategies of Green Buildings Adoption in Tanzania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Siwei Chen & Zhonghua Gou, 2022. "An Investigation of Green Roof Spatial Distribution and Incentive Policies Using Green Buildings as a Benchmark," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Peace, Joseph & Sweet, Matthias & Scott, Darren M., 2023. "Why do planners do what they do? and what are the implications? Guidance from on-demand ride-hailing policy in Toronto and Vancouver, Canada," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 72-82.
    16. Ke Guo & Yongbo Yuan, 2021. "Geographic Distribution and Influencing Factor Analysis of Green Residential Buildings in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Sicheng Wang & Yuanyuan Guo & Hao Zhang & Mingming Gao, 2023. "A Life-Cycle Carbon Emissions Evaluation Model for Traditional Residential Houses: Applying to Traditional Dong Dwellings in Qandongnan, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-31, September.
    18. Prin Boonkanit & Kridchai Suthiluck, 2023. "Developing a Decision-Making Support System for a Smart Construction and Demolition Waste Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    19. Suyang Xue & Jiaming Na & Libin Wang & Shuangjun Wang & Xiaoxiao Xu, 2023. "The Outlook of Green Building Development in China during the “Fourteenth Five-Year Plan” Period," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Li, Xiang & Ge, Jingyun, 2025. "Wild goose chase or not? Equilibrium in a hybrid ride-hailing market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 73-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:226-:d:1031918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.