IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i12p2091-d1284511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing and Food Production: Resident and Grower Perceptions of Peri-Urban Food-Production Landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Shannon Davis

    (Centre of Excellence: Designing Future Productive Landscapes, School of Landscape Architecture, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand)

  • Guanyu Chen

    (Centre of Excellence: Designing Future Productive Landscapes, School of Landscape Architecture, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand)

  • Naomi Darvill

    (Centre of Excellence: Designing Future Productive Landscapes, School of Landscape Architecture, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand)

Abstract

The loss of productive soils and food-producing landscapes on the edges of cities is an increasing issue facing Aotearoa New Zealand. Like many countries globally, New Zealand’s largest cities are facing rapid expansion because of increasing urbanisation, with high levels of low-density residential sprawl into the productive peri-urban hinterlands and increasing rates of ‘reverse sensitivity’. Food production, as a result, is being pushed further away, disconnected from the communities it serves, and often onto less productive soil. This paper explores the perceptions and attitudes of both peri-urban residents and food producers living and working within the peri-urban zone of Ōtautahi Christchurch. Conducting two surveys, one with residents and another with producers, respondents’ perceptions of food growing within this peri-urban landscape are explored to better understand the enablers and barriers of growing food close to cities. Overall, the results indicated that peri-urban residents appreciate food being produced close to where they live, with over 90% of residential respondents feeling either ‘mostly positive’ or ‘extremely positive’ towards food being grown close to their homes. Of greatest concern for peri-urban residents were issues relating to negative impacts on the environment and human health, with particular concern for water quality. The lack of accessibility to locally produced food was also identified as an area of concern to residents. Food producers felt less positive towards operating their food-production enterprises within the peri-urban zone, identifying a range of issues impacting their experience. The information rendered from these surveys provides a base for future land-use planning consideration within the peri-urban zone, where both food production and housing can co-exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Shannon Davis & Guanyu Chen & Naomi Darvill, 2023. "Housing and Food Production: Resident and Grower Perceptions of Peri-Urban Food-Production Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2091-:d:1284511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2091/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2091/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Swaffield, 2012. "Reinventing Spatial Planning at the Urban Rural Interface: A Christchurch, New Zealand Case Study," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 405-422.
    2. Kameshwari Pothukuchi & Jerome Kaufman, 1999. "Placing the food system on the urban agenda: The role of municipal institutions in food systems planning," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 16(2), pages 213-224, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara A. L. Smaal & Joost Dessein & Barend J. Wind & Elke Rogge, 2021. "Social justice-oriented narratives in European urban food strategies: Bringing forward redistribution, recognition and representation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Kassis, Grâce & Bertrand, Nathalie, 2022. "Institutional changes in farmland governance emerging from a collective land preservation procedure upholding local food projects: Evidence from a French case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Alexandra Titz & Sosten S. Chiotha, 2019. "Pathways for Sustainable and Inclusive Cities in Southern and Eastern Africa through Urban Green Infrastructure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    4. White, James T. & Bunn, Christopher, 2017. "Growing in Glasgow: Innovative practices and emerging policy pathways for urban agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 334-344.
    5. Pilar González-Torre & Jorge Coque, 2016. "How is a food bank managed? Different profiles in Spain," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 89-100, March.
    6. Levy, Deborah & Hills, Raewyn & Perkins, Harvey C. & Mackay, Michael & Campbell, Malcolm & Johnston, Karen, 2021. "Local benevolent property development entrepreneurs in small town regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Dewaelheyns, Valerie & Lerouge, Frederik & Rogge, Elke & Vranken, Liesbet, 2014. "Garden space: Mapping trade-offs and the adaptive capacity of home food production," Working Papers 187602, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    8. Melanie Bedore, 2014. "The convening power of food as growth machine politics: A study of food policymaking and partnership formation in Baltimore," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 2979-2995, November.
    9. Moragues-Faus, Ana & Battersby, Jane, 2021. "Urban food policies for a sustainable and just future: Concepts and tools for a renewed agenda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Daniela Poli, 2016. "Rivoluzione alimentare e parchi agricoli multifunzionali nella piana fiorentina," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 70-91.
    11. Robin Kortright & Sarah Wakefield, 2011. "Edible backyards: a qualitative study of household food growing and its contributions to food security," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(1), pages 39-53, February.
    12. Lenore Newman & Denver Nixon, 2014. "Farming in an Agriburban Ecovillage Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    13. Sinan Kordon & Patrick A. Miller & Cermetrius L. Bohannon, 2022. "Attitudes and Perceptions of Community Gardens: Making a Place for Them in Our Neighborhoods," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Nadezda Shcherbakova, 2012. "Globalisation Or Autonomy Of A Big City: Evidence From St. Petersburg," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 53-70, JUNE.
    15. Vara-Sánchez, Isabel & Gallar-Hernández, David & García-García, Lidia & Morán Alonso, Nerea & Moragues-Faus, Ana, 2021. "The co-production of urban food policies: Exploring the emergence of new governance spaces in three Spanish cities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Yuanchuan Yang & Yukun Zhang & Si Huang, 2020. "Urban Agriculture Oriented Community Planning and Spatial Modeling in Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Amanda Maria Edmonds & Gerrit J. Carsjens, 2021. "Markets in Municipal Code: The Case of Michigan Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-39, April.
    18. Amy Herrington & Tamara L. Mix, 2021. "Invisible and Insecure in Rural America: Cultivating Dignity in Local Food Security Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Ambrogio Zanzi & Valentina Vaglia & Roberto Spigarolo & Stefano Bocchi, 2021. "Assessing Agri-Food Start-Ups Sustainability in Peri-Urban Agriculture Context," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Barthes, Carole & Bertrand, Nathalie, 2016. "L’échelon intercommunal dans la gouvernance foncière des espaces agricoles," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 353(May-July).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2091-:d:1284511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.