IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i3p354-d760286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Location of Coworking Spaces (CWSs) Regarding Vicinity, Land Use and Points of Interest (POIs)

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Hölzel

    (Chair of Land Management, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Kai-Hendrik Kolsch

    (Chair of Land Management, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Walter Timo de Vries

    (Chair of Land Management, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Background: The place of work is, besides the place of residence, a main travel destination in the course of the day for working people, who make up the majority of western European societies. Other daily destinations, such as those for childcare, social activities, and buying groceries, are spatially related to both of these. This article aims to detect if and how the character of the neighbourhood and the associated land use is related to the location of coworking spaces. Specifically, we investigate the spatial relation between coworking spaces (CWSs) in peripheral and non-peripheral regions to specific points of interest (POIs). These POIs could be daily destinations relevant for a common lifestyle of working people. The data rely on identifying the location of CWSs (peripheral/non-peripheral, land use) in Germany and relating the location of CWSs to the location of POIs using georeferenced data. The results show an accumulation of CWSs and POIs in non-peripheral regions and residential areas and a higher number of specific POIs in their vicinity. From these results, we infer that a relatively higher number of specific POIs in the vicinity of CWSs makes it more likely to use this service and thus provides specific advantages to users of CWSs. If work is performed in a CWS close to the place of residence, other daily destinations could be reached in a short time and the spending capacity could remain in the local economy. The quality of life could increase, and the commute is shrinking with effects on traffic, carbon emission, and work–life balance. Further research could investigate whether this also occurs in an international context, and could focus on developing social-spatial models, by making of use remote sensing. In this way, one could measure the impact on public space and on the neighbourhood of CWSs more quantitatively.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Hölzel & Kai-Hendrik Kolsch & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Location of Coworking Spaces (CWSs) Regarding Vicinity, Land Use and Points of Interest (POIs)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:354-:d:760286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/354/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/354/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Küpper, Patrick & Peters, Jan Cornelius, 2019. "Entwicklung regionaler Disparitäten hinsichtlich Wirtschaftskraft, sozialer Lage sowie Daseinsvorsorge und Infrastruktur in Deutschland und seinen ländlichen Räumen," Thünen Report 283501, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Jürgen Staab, 2018. "Erneuerbare Energien in Kommunen," Springer Books, Springer, edition 4, number 978-3-658-19907-4, March.
    3. Mengi, Onur & Bilandzic, Ana & Foth, Marcus & Guaralda, Mirko, 2020. "Mapping Brisbane’s Casual Creative Corridor: Land use and policy implications of a new genre in urban creative ecosystems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Malia Jones & Anne Pebley, 2014. "Redefining Neighborhoods Using Common Destinations: Social Characteristics of Activity Spaces and Home Census Tracts Compared," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 727-752, June.
    5. Marco Hölzel & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Digitization as a Driver fur Rural Development—An Indicative Description of German Coworking Space Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Huihui Wang & Weihua Zeng, 2019. "Revealing Urban Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Emission Characteristics and Influencing Mechanisms from the Perspective of Commuting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Neumeier, Stefan, 2014. "Modellierung der Erreichbarkeit von Supermärkten und Discountern: Untersuchung zum regionalen Versorgungsgrad mit Dienstleistungen der Grundversorgung," Thünen Working Papers 16, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clément Marinos & Sébastien Bourdin & Guy Baudelle, 2025. "The new geography of “third places” in France: Explaining a deconcentration process outside metro areas," Post-Print hal-04865983, HAL.
    2. Yunho Ji & Sang-Min Kim & YoungJun Kim, 2024. "A Way to Attract Digital Nomads to Tourist Destinations in the New Normal Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Nikolay Sterev & Kostadin Kostadinov & Daniel Yordanov & Tsvetelina Yorgova, 2023. "Open Entrepreneurial Academic Centres," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 116-134.
    4. Wei Gao & Xinzheng Zhao & Jianwei Li & Dekang Zhang & Yang Rui & Tongsheng Li & Min Lei, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Pattern Identification and Driving Mechanism of Urban Shrinkage in the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Gehad Megahed & Abeer Elshater & Samy Afifi & Mohab Abdelmoneim Elrefaie, 2024. "Reconceptualizing Proximity Measurement Approaches through the Urban Discourse on the X-Minute City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Florian Ahlmeyer & Kati Volgmann, 2023. "What Can We Expect for the Development of Rural Areas in Europe?—Trends of the Last Decade and Their Opportunities for Rural Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wieland, Thomas, 2015. "Nahversorgung im Kontext raumökonomischer Entwicklungen im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel: Konzeption und Durchführung einer GIS-gestützten Analyse der Strukturen des Lebensmitteleinzelhandels und der Nahve," MPRA Paper 77145, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lo, A. W.-T. & Houston, D., 2018. "How do compact, accessible, and walkable communities promote gender equality in spatial behavior?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 42-54.
    3. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Ruishan Chen & Chao Ye, 2022. "Land Perspectives: People, Tenure, Planning, Tools, Space, and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5, February.
    4. Erin York Cornwell & Kathleen A Cagney, 2017. "Aging in Activity Space: Results From Smartphone-Based GPS-Tracking of Urban Seniors," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 864-875.
    5. Gregory Sharp & Richard M Carpiano, 2023. "Neighborhood social organization exposures and racial/ethnic disparities in hypertension risk in Los Angeles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Łukasz Komorowski & Agata Mróz & Monika Stanny, 2020. "The Spatial Pattern of the Absorption of Cohesion Policy Funds in Polish Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Lee Fiorio & Emilio Zagheni & Guy J. Abel & Johnathan Hill & Gabriel Pestre & Emmanuel Letouzé & Jixuan Cai, 2020. "Analyzing the effect of time in migration measurement using geo-referenced digital trace data," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-024, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    8. Henrike Hermanussen & Jens-Peter Loy & Bekhzod Egamberdiev, 2022. "Determinants of Food Waste from Household Food Consumption: A Case Study from Field Survey in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Clément Marinos & Sébastien Bourdin & Guy Baudelle, 2025. "The new geography of “third places” in France: Explaining a deconcentration process outside metro areas," Post-Print hal-04865983, HAL.
    10. Liz Price & Jane Deville & Fiona Ashmore, 2021. "A guide to developing a rural digital hub," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 683-694, November.
    11. Schelisch, Lynn & Spellerberg, Annette, 2021. "Digital Divide: Soziale Aspekte der Digitalisierung," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spellerberg, Annette (ed.), Digitalisierung in ländlichen und verdichteten Räumen, volume 31, pages 53-62, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    12. Andrew L. Hicks & Mark S. Handcock & Narayan Sastry & Anne R. Pebley, 2018. "Sequential Neighborhood Effects: The Effect of Long-Term Exposure to Concentrated Disadvantage on Children’s Reading and Math Test Scores," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(1), pages 1-31, February.
    13. Wasilewski Adam & Krzyżanowski Julian & Chmieliński Paweł, 2021. "Complementarity of the Measures of the Common Agricultural Policy and the Cohesion Policy for Rural Development Between 2021 And 2027 in the Light of Programing Documents," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 319674, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    14. Nicolo P Pinchak & Christopher R Browning & Catherine A Calder & Bethany Boettner, 2021. "Activity locations, residential segregation and the significance of residential neighbourhood boundary perceptions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2758-2781, October.
    15. Li, Ran & Tong, Daoqin, 2016. "Constructing human activity spaces: A new approach incorporating complex urban activity-travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 23-35.
    16. Zhang, Yanji & Wang, Jiejing & Kan, Changcheng, 2022. "Temporal variation in activity-space-based segregation: A case study of Beijing using location-based service data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Shen, Yao, 2019. "Segregation through space: A scope of the flow-based spatial interaction model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 10-23.
    18. Lina Hedman & Kati Kadarik & Roger Andersson & John Östh, 2021. "Daily Mobility Patterns: Reducing or Reproducing Inequalities and Segregation?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 208-221.
    19. Brazil, Noli & Chakalov, Bozhidar T. & Ko, Michelle, 2024. "The health implications of neighborhood networks based on daily mobility in US cities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 354(C).
    20. Casper J. P. Zhang & Anthony Barnett & Janice M. Johnston & Poh-chin Lai & Ruby S. Y. Lee & Cindy H. P. Sit & Ester Cerin, 2019. "Objectively-Measured Neighbourhood Attributes as Correlates and Moderators of Quality of Life in Older Adults with Different Living Arrangements: The ALECS Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:354-:d:760286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.