IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1199-d673252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Cereal Productivity on Sandy Soil in Response to Some Soil-Improving Cropping Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jerzy Lipiec

    (Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland)

  • Bogusław Usowicz

    (Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland
    Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45 E, 15-351 Białystok, Poland)

Abstract

Little information is available on the effect of soil-improving cropping systems (SICS) on crop productivity on low fertility sandy soils although they are increasingly being used in agriculture in many regions of the world due to the growing demand for food. The study aimed at quantifying the effect of four soil-improving cropping systems applied on sandy soil on cereal productivity (yield of grain and straw and plant height) in a 4-year field experiment conducted in Poland with spring cereal crops: oat (2017), wheat (2018), wheat (2019), and oat (2020). The experiment included the control (C) and the following SICS: liming (L), leguminous catch crops for green manure (LU), farmyard manure (M), and farmyard manure + liming + leguminous catch crops for green manure together (M + L + LU). To quantify the effect of the SICS, classic statistics and the Bland–Altman method were used. It was shown that all yield trait components significantly increased in the last study year (2020) under SICS with M and M + L + LU. All yield trait components were significantly lower in the dry years (2018–2019) than in the wet years (2017 and 2020). The relatively large rainfall quantity in May during intensive growth at shooting and the scarce precipitation during later growth in the dry year 2019 resulted in a significantly greater straw yield compared to the other dry year 2018. The values of Bland–Altman bias (mean difference between the particular SICS and the control) varied (in kg m −2 ) from −0.002 for LU in 2019 to 0.128 for M and 0.132 for M + L + LU in 2020. The highest limits of agreement (LoA) were in general noted for all yield trait components (the least even yield) in the most productive SICS including M and M + L + LU in the wet year 2020. The Bland–Altman ratio (BAR) values indicate that quantification of the effects of all soil-improving practices was most uncertain in the dry year 2018 for the grain yield and in the wet year 2020 for the straw yield and much less uncertain for the plant height in all SICS and study years. The results of this study provide helpful information about the effect of the SICS on the different yield trait components depending on the period of their application and weather conditions prevailing during the growing season.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerzy Lipiec & Bogusław Usowicz, 2021. "Quantifying Cereal Productivity on Sandy Soil in Response to Some Soil-Improving Cropping Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1199-:d:673252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1199/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1199/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin A. Bolinder & Felicity Crotty & Annemie Elsen & Magdalena Frac & Tamás Kismányoky & Jerzy Lipiec & Mia Tits & Zoltán Tóth & Thomas Kätterer, 2020. "The effect of crop residues, cover crops, manures and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon changes in agroecosystems: a synthesis of reviews," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 929-952, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rudi Hessel & Guido Wyseure & Ioanna S. Panagea & Abdallah Alaoui & Mark S. Reed & Hedwig van Delden & Melanie Muro & Jane Mills & Oene Oenema & Francisco Areal & Erik van den Elsen & Simone Verzandvo, 2022. "Soil-Improving Cropping Systems for Sustainable and Profitable Farming in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Salwinder Singh Dhaliwal & Vivek Sharma & Arvind Kumar Shukla & Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Vibha Verma & Manmeet Kaur & Sanjib Kumar Behera & Prabhjot Singh, 2023. "Residual Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Wheat under a Basmati Rice–Wheat Cropping System in North-Western India," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Jantiene E. M. Baartman & Joao Pedro Nunes & Hedwig van Delden & Roel Vanhout & Luuk Fleskens, 2022. "The Effects of Soil Improving Cropping Systems (SICS) on Soil Erosion and Soil Organic Carbon Stocks across Europe: A Simulation Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, June.
    4. George Bilas & Nikolaos Karapetsas & Anne Gobin & Konstantinos Mesdanitis & Gergely Toth & Tamás Hermann & Yaosheng Wang & Liangguo Luo & Thomas M. Koutsos & Dimitrios Moshou & Thomas K. Alexandridis, 2022. "Land Suitability Analysis as a Tool for Evaluating Soil-Improving Cropping Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Gábor Csitári & Zoltán Tóth & Mónika Kökény, 2021. "Effects of Organic Amendments on Soil Aggregate Stability and Microbial Biomass in a Long-Term Fertilization Experiment (IOSDV)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Damien Beillouin & Marc Corbeels & Julien Demenois & David Berre & Annie Boyer & Abigail Fallot & Frédéric Feder & Rémi Cardinael, 2023. "A global meta-analysis of soil organic carbon in the Anthropocene," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Taghikhah, Firouzeh & Borevitz, Justin & Costanza, Robert & Voinov, Alexey, 2022. "DAESim: A dynamic agro-ecosystem simulation model for natural capital assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1199-:d:673252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.